My guy would choose a signed Galen Rupp singlet over the embryos? I don't blame you. Whether you confer more value to the five year old because of "personhood" or not does not take away from the scientific fact that the embryo is a part of the human species. And like I said earlier it might be more ethical to choose the embryos over the five year old if you were the last female on Earth with a medical team at your disposal, no pun intended.
It shows pretty clearly that you don’t think it’s a person. Otherwise you’d save 100 lives instead of 1.
The crux of my stance is that an embryo is part of the human species, and humans have intrinsic value and should not be murdered-it is immoral. Maybe I would choose the five year old because apparently the embryos cannot experience pain, which does not take away from the fact that the embryos are part of the human species.
Just because I would choose the five year old over a 99 year old cancer patient does not mean the 99 year old isn't human.
Dur Would you rather save an embryo that is one day old or two durr.
pointless scenarios
These Roe apologist monkeys are just complete idiots. I couldn’t have been more quantitative and clearer that I would choose the hundred embryos, even ten embryos, over the 5 year old in the stupid hypothetical scenario even taking it at face value. Yet they are having a circle jerk telling themselves they have found some contradiction of principle in Roe opposers. I’ve even blocked several of them but keep seeing their quoted silliness.
The Monkey has only one tactic: to keep saying you still haven’t told us the answer. Doesn’t matter what you say. It’s as if he has pre-prepared responses irrespective of what the other person says.
Picking the embryos is the wrong answer. You obviously should pick the child. In my opinion.
Go back a few pages. Bluh posted a video from the majority report not realizing it was a pro choice/left wing media outlet and I called him on it. Chaos ensued.
What chaos? I told you even then I didn’t mind it at all. Seems like you still haven’t acquired reading comprehension.
It’s as if MR fan thinks I don’t read or listen to points of view not conforming to my own beliefs and would be offended if “caught” doing it. Bubbled up monkeys think and behave like that.
These Roe apologist monkeys are just complete idiots. I couldn’t have been more quantitative and clearer that I would choose the hundred embryos, even ten embryos, over the 5 year old in the stupid hypothetical scenario even taking it at face value. Yet they are having a circle jerk telling themselves they have found some contradiction of principle in Roe opposers. I’ve even blocked several of them but keep seeing their quoted silliness.
The Monkey has only one tactic: to keep saying you still haven’t told us the answer. Doesn’t matter what you say. It’s as if he has pre-prepared responses irrespective of what the other person says.
Picking the embryos is the wrong answer. You obviously should pick the child. In my opinion.
You got it. Your setup was such that if one answered Yes, they are a box of contradictions, and if No, they are just wrong, so you win either way. Congratulations.
What chaos? I told you even then I didn’t mind it at all. Seems like you still haven’t acquired reading comprehension.
It’s as if MR fan thinks I don’t read or listen to points of view not conforming to my own beliefs and would be offended if “caught” doing it. Bubbled up monkeys think and behave like that.
You blocked people you didn't agree with. You admitted it! Are you senile?
Picking the embryos is the wrong answer. You obviously should pick the child. In my opinion.
You got it. Your setup was such that if one answered Yes, they are a box of contradictions, and if No, they are just wrong, so you win either way. Congratulations.
Do you foster children? If so why not? Do you pay for IVF of stranded embryos into surrogates? If so why not?
It’s as if MR fan thinks I don’t read or listen to points of view not conforming to my own beliefs and would be offended if “caught” doing it. Bubbled up monkeys think and behave like that.
You blocked people you didn't agree with. You admitted it! Are you senile?
Who told you it was because I didn’t agree with them? Disagreement is totally fine.
I don’t think you know what “senile” means. Get an education.
It shows pretty clearly that you don’t think it’s a person. Otherwise you’d save 100 lives instead of 1.
The crux of my stance is that an embryo is part of the human species, and humans have intrinsic value and should not be murdered-it is immoral. Maybe I would choose the five year old because apparently the embryos cannot experience pain, which does not take away from the fact that the embryos are part of the human species.
Just because I would choose the five year old over a 99 year old cancer patient does not mean the 99 year old isn't human.
I don't think the formation of cells and our DNA sequencing are the deciding factors in what makes a human. I think a human has to have some level of brain activity.
The crux of my stance is that an embryo is part of the human species, and humans have intrinsic value and should not be murdered-it is immoral. Maybe I would choose the five year old because apparently the embryos cannot experience pain, which does not take away from the fact that the embryos are part of the human species.
Just because I would choose the five year old over a 99 year old cancer patient does not mean the 99 year old isn't human.
I don't think the formation of cells and our DNA sequencing are the deciding factors in what makes a human. I think a human has to have some level of brain activity.
If I were ever in favor of abortion, besides exceptional cases it would be because of lack of brain activity, so ~43 days. I am not though-I mean what sets asides other animals with brain activity and humans? The answer to that is what I believe a human is, and that combined with being living means abortion is speciecide.
Also please ask your mother if she would have aborted you as an embryo or saved the five year old in the fire.
We should make a law that you legally must be a foster parent if you are of age. To see how quickly “wanting a choice to be a parent” gets mentioned
The fact that you think the prospect of a foster child will be unwelcome to me, a random person you know little about, speaks much more about you than anyone else. If anything, you should expect an anti-Roe person to be parenting-friendly.
Anti roe people are more likely to be uneducated, gun-owning, supporting beating kids, dogmatically religious(to the point of letting priests molest their kids) , poor, and have proven they care little for kids post birth.
You don't realise how much pleasure it gives me that coming from a country of only 5 million I have driven you to a state of rage that anyone dare criticise the US. You are a perfect example of its failings, in your overweening vanity and monumental ignorance. Attacking me is the only thing you can think about, as you poke feebly at at a country that is ranked second amongst the world's democracies, and is so far ahead of the ailing patient that is now the US.
Maori in New Zealand don't get to experience pleasure. They get to experience white supremacy and racism - every day.
No one is lynching them or putting a knee on their neck. But in your little tantrum it appears you have long forgotten the subject of the thread. Something else too hard for you to defend?
The fact that you think the prospect of a foster child will be unwelcome to me, a random person you know little about, speaks much more about you than anyone else. If anything, you should expect an anti-Roe person to be parenting-friendly.
Anti roe people are more likely to be uneducated, gun-owning, supporting beating kids, dogmatically religious(to the point of letting priests molest their kids) , poor, and have proven they care little for kids post birth.
pro-choice people have better qualities
“Pro-life people care little for kids after birth”
Pro-choice terrorists proceed to fire bomb, vandalize and threaten workers at centers that assist mothers with crisis pregnancies before and after birth.
Also, Christians (I understand all are not pro-life, though most are) are twice as likely to adopt and much more likely to adopt OLDER kids. That’s important, because most people don’t want to adopt older kids.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.