Gary - to give you an idea of the absurdity of the things you post and believe in... let's see here:
- You claim one of the ABC moderators and a big boss of Disney Entertainment are close friends of Harris. First of all, do you have any proof that they are close friends? Did they fly on her plane and attend Harris' underage sex parties? Or are these 2 people that Harris likes to call up whenever she wants to trash her opponent live on ABC anytime? Back up your claim.
- Harris has been around for a while. Of course she knows a lot of people. Some of them work in MSM. Trump has been in tv/entertainment his whole life and knows a lot more people than she does. He is openly friends with Hannity and several others in FOX news. He knows people in left-leaning media as well. You are suggesting that is already proof of wrongdoing.
- The whole world knew what the questions were gonna be. Harris and Trump have been talking about those issues every single time they hold a rally. It was all high-level questions on the economy, national security, immigration, crime, etc... pick any question - all were basic and a given that they might be asked. Supposedly this whistleblower claims Harris received sample questions... that's VERY weak.
- Assurances that Trump would be fact checked? Yeah, I'd sure as hell ask for that too and ridiculous if you say that's cheating. The guy lies every single time he opens his mouth and news professionals should absolutely be fact checking. And as for Harris not being fact checked... She did and it's quite simple. She stretches the truth and may tell a small lie here and there. Trump tells a blatantly outrageous and insane lie every time he opens his mouth. He lied dozens of times and only got fact checked on a few, and dug in on those with more lies. He was more than asking for it. If 5% of his lies got fact checked, how were they going to fact check 5% of 4 Harris lies? Come on man.
- Things built into the debate to give Harris an advantage? LOLz.. you mean general questions about the economy, national security, immigration, crime that both should have been super prepared for? What were they supposed to do - ask Trump to keep elaborating on his thoughts on the state of the country and how criminal the left is? This was a plain vanilla debate full of soft ball questions. Insane to excuse his terrible performance.
To summarize, that's a massive nothingburger. Good luck!