Roe v Wade just got overturned official thread

Harambe wrote:

dababykilla wrote:

That you feel the need to protect people killing a human-being out of the womb but would willingly kill him/her in the womb is absolutely INSANE, talking about cognitive dissonance... Well it's her body so it's OK.

The location of the embryos was never stated. If life begins at conception and all lives are valued the same, it shouldn't matter. Got'em :)

Bad Wigins wrote:

This stupid battle between morals and virtues has nothing to do with the law.

As I explained before, federal law protects natural rights, but has never extended them to the unborn. Pro-choice is the legally correct position.

There is no virtue in that position - single motherhood isn't the tragedy it was 50 years ago, either socially or economically. Nobody's life would be ruined.

You all think you're so great but this is the biggest waste of everyone's time since that deal about calling gay couples "married" or not

dababykilla wrote:

kganrwownlibs wrote:

“Thought experiments that cause cognitive dissonance must be mocked - reevaluating my own philosophical framework is far too much work”

Every great philosopher who ever lived would be deeply ashamed for you.

That you feel the need to protect people killing a human-being out of the womb but would willingly kill him/her in the womb is absolutely INSANE, talking about cognitive dissonance... Well it's her body so it's OK.

Harambe wrote:

kganrwownlibs wrote:

There are thousands of infants and embryos that need a womb or a home.
Interesting I see very little volunteering from the anti-choice camp.
It’s only fun to morally posture and virtue signal…. Way way less fun to actually live out those morals.

Well, it's more likely that these bloviators didn't really follow their 'intellectually and morally consistent' frameworks deeper than surface-level madposting. They didn't even realize how silly their positions were until you called them out. Now they have to find a way to backtrack and pretend that they were ok with babykilling all along. oopsie

bluh.. wrote:

dababykilla wrote:

That you feel the need to protect people killing a human-being out of the womb but would willingly kill him/her in the womb is absolutely INSANE, talking about cognitive dissonance... Well it's her body so it's OK.

Exactly. The Monkeys talk like until the umbilical cord is cut, beheading a baby is okay. For some reason, if they can’t see it outside the womb, it doesn’t exist, has zero value. It’s like.. they lack Object Permanence.

2600 bro wrote:

So I’ve read the past 10 pages of this thread.
Seems like this guy got owned by like 4 posters and then blocked them and declared victory?
I guess he got his “safe space.”

Why do you nerds even want to discuss this stuff on LetsRun?

bluh.. wrote:

2600 bro wrote:

So I’ve read the past 10 pages of this thread.
Seems like this guy got owned by like 4 posters and then blocked them and declared victory?
I guess he got his “safe space.”

Why do you nerds even want to discuss this stuff on LetsRun?

Here comes a new reading challenged one to join the monkey brotherhood.

Harambe wrote:

bluh.. wrote:

Exactly. The Monkeys talk like until the umbilical cord is cut, beheading a baby is okay. For some reason, if they can’t see it outside the womb, it doesn’t exist, has zero value. It’s like.. they lack Object Permanence.

It has plenty of value. Just less than a person who has been born. This is the position of reasonable people with consistent intellectual and moral values around abortion.

You don't have these. You have a jumble of random conservative and contrarian ideas bouncing around + lots of rage so you end up contradicting yourself, walking back, ignoring questions, retreating to intentionally vague statements i.e. all the hallmarks of someone who hasn't really though through their position.

2600 bro wrote:

bluh.. wrote:

Here comes a new reading challenged one to join the monkey brotherhood.

I promise you it’s not worth getting this mad on this forum. It will destroy your mind.

see my history in the vaccine thread.

Harambe wrote:

It has plenty of value. Just less than a person who has been born. This is the position of reasonable people with consistent intellectual and moral values around abortion.

You don't have these. You have a jumble of random conservative and contrarian ideas bouncing around + lots of rage so you end up contradicting yourself, walking back, ignoring questions, retreating to intentionally vague statements i.e. all the hallmarks of someone who hasn't really though through their position.

dababykilla wrote:

Harambe wrote:

The location of the embryos was never stated. If life begins at conception and all lives are valued the same, it shouldn't matter. Got'em :)

My guy would choose a signed Galen Rupp singlet over the embryos? I don't blame you. Whether you confer more value to the five year old because of "personhood" or not does not take away from the scientific fact that the embryo is a part of the human species. And like I said earlier it might be more ethical to choose the embryos over the five year old if you were the last female on Earth with a medical team at your disposal, no pun intended.

bluh.. wrote:

2600 bro wrote:

I promise you it’s not worth getting this mad on this forum. It will destroy your mind.

see my history in the vaccine thread.

Why would you think anyone’s getting mad? It’s entertaining to watch stupid people open display their stupidity.

Utterly uninterested in your take on vaccine. Stay on topic.

bluh.. wrote:

2600 bro wrote:

I promise you it’s not worth getting this mad on this forum. It will destroy your mind.

see my history in the vaccine thread.

Why would you think anyone’s getting mad? It’s entertaining to watch stupid people open display their stupidity.

Utterly uninterested in your take on vaccine. Stay on topic.

MR fan 1 wrote:

bluh.. wrote:

Why would you think anyone’s getting mad? It’s entertaining to watch stupid people open display their stupidity.

Utterly uninterested in your take on vaccine. Stay on topic.

You were so mad earlier you talked about cumming on my face.

MR fan 1 wrote:

bluh.. wrote:

Why would you think anyone’s getting mad? It’s entertaining to watch stupid people open display their stupidity.

Utterly uninterested in your take on vaccine. Stay on topic.

You were so mad earlier you talked about cumming on my face.

2600 bro wrote:

MR fan 1 wrote:

You were so mad earlier you talked about cumming on my face.

Mad or aroused?? Same thing??

hunter wheres the blow wrote:

dababykilla wrote:

My guy would choose a signed Galen Rupp singlet over the embryos? I don't blame you. Whether you confer more value to the five year old because of "personhood" or not does not take away from the scientific fact that the embryo is a part of the human species. And like I said earlier it might be more ethical to choose the embryos over the five year old if you were the last female on Earth with a medical team at your disposal, no pun intended.

It shows pretty clearly that you don’t think it’s a person. Otherwise you’d save 100 lives instead of 1.

MR fan 1 wrote:

2600 bro wrote:

Mad or aroused?? Same thing??

Go back a few pages. Bluh posted a video from the majority report not realizing it was a pro choice/left wing media outlet and I called him on it. Chaos ensued.