remember that people on this thread still claim that trump isn't a threat to the constitution.
Trump claims power to overturn Article I of the Constitution (Congress's authority over spending); Article II (predecessor's pardon power); and Article III (by defying a federal court order). 9:27 AM · Mar 17, 2025 · 23.3K Views
remember that people on this thread still claim that trump isn't a threat to the constitution.
Trump claims power to overturn Article I of the Constitution (Congress's authority over spending); Article II (predecessor's pardon power); and Article III (by defying a federal court order). 9:27 AM · Mar 17, 2025 · 23.3K Views
Trump is claiming an intern signing things with an autopen wasn't Biden at all.
Interns at the White House do not have pardon power.
remember that people on this thread still claim that trump isn't a threat to the constitution.
Trump claims power to overturn Article I of the Constitution (Congress's authority over spending); Article II (predecessor's pardon power); and Article III (by defying a federal court order). 9:27 AM · Mar 17, 2025 · 23.3K Views
Trump is claiming an intern signing things with an autopen wasn't Biden at all.
Interns at the White House do not have pardon power.
I simply do not believe you are a real person. No real person could be this gullible.
This post was edited 17 seconds after it was posted.
remember that people on this thread still claim that trump isn't a threat to the constitution.
Trump claims power to overturn Article I of the Constitution (Congress's authority over spending); Article II (predecessor's pardon power); and Article III (by defying a federal court order). 9:27 AM · Mar 17, 2025 · 23.3K Views
Trump is claiming an intern signing things with an autopen wasn't Biden at all.
Interns at the White House do not have pardon power.
Autopen has been used for decades. If that's Trump's "in" then he can ignore anything he wants by claiming the relevant person didn't actually sign it by hand.
Term limits? Harry Truman was known to have used autopen so maybe the 22nd amendment isn't valid after all. Maybe judgements Trump doesn't like can be voided by simply saying a judge used an autopen signature. Perhaps there's a host of bills that don't need to be enforced anymore.
Now people are starting do discuss if Europe should develop nukes and use them on US if necessary to prevent more destabilization and keep democracy. Things are getting out of control. Huge snowball effect
I'd like to seem them try! We're tough. We're macho. We're Alphas!
Now people are starting do discuss if Europe should develop nukes and use them on US if necessary to prevent more destabilization and keep democracy. Things are getting out of control. Huge snowball effect
I'd like to seem them try! We're tough. We're macho. We're Alphas!
MAGA! MAGA!
the biggest threat posed by Tunmp's killing of NATO and our pacts with Japan and SK is that many nations will have to get nuclear weapons now.
End of civilization stuff.
Because of transgenders and a bored, ignorant electorate.
Trump is claiming an intern signing things with an autopen wasn't Biden at all.
Interns at the White House do not have pardon power.
Autopen has been used for decades. If that's Trump's "in" then he can ignore anything he wants by claiming the relevant person didn't actually sign it by hand.
Term limits? Harry Truman was known to have used autopen so maybe the 22nd amendment isn't valid after all. Maybe judgements Trump doesn't like can be voided by simply saying a judge used an autopen signature. Perhaps there's a host of bills that don't need to be enforced anymore.
The autopen isn't the issue it's the mental incompetence of the president and no one having any idea who was running the country after the Democrat party said the man was too incompetent to run for re-election and threw him out of the election.
Trump pulls the US out of the EU led war crimes commission against Russia over the Ukraine invasion. This appears almost in concert with a new Russian effort to invent allegations of Ukrainian war crimes in Kursk in order to hinder ceasefire negotiations. And this may also be part of a wider plan to include in a peace deal a requirement that Ukraine admit that it was the aggressor which would obligate Ukraine to pay reparations to Russia. This may be what Trump meant when he posted about talking to Putin about dividing up Ukraine's "assets". And this is why the peace negotiations are taking place between Russia and the US to the exclusion of the EU. The deal will basically destroy Ukraine's economy and leave the country a sitting duck for the next invasion by Russia, which will likely occur before the end of Trump's term to ensure there is no US support for Ukraine's defense. This deal, if it happens, will make the Motlov-Ribbentrop pact look like a masterclass in drafting an agreement to ensure an enduring peace.
The United States has decided to withdraw from an international group investigating Russias war crimes in Ukraine, marking a shift in its foreign policy. The move, expected to be formally announced soon, also includes reducin...
Russian leader Vladimir Putin and other Russian officials have been reinforcing a false narrative, accusing the Ukrainian military of alleged war crimes during operations in Russia’s Kursk Oblast in an attempt to derail negot...
Autopen has been used for decades. If that's Trump's "in" then he can ignore anything he wants by claiming the relevant person didn't actually sign it by hand.
Term limits? Harry Truman was known to have used autopen so maybe the 22nd amendment isn't valid after all. Maybe judgements Trump doesn't like can be voided by simply saying a judge used an autopen signature. Perhaps there's a host of bills that don't need to be enforced anymore.
The autopen isn't the issue it's the mental incompetence of the president and no one having any idea who was running the country after the Democrat party said the man was too incompetent to run for re-election and threw him out of the election.
Have to say, it's good news that ETTD has worked on Tesla. It will discourage other important companies from working with the Trumpists. That could be very very good news. 3.75 years to go.
Yes if the US leaves NATO then NATO would be forced to pretend the UK and France don't already have nuclear weapons....
You're so dumb...
now do Saudi, Japan, Germany, South Korea, Australia, Canada, etc
and NATO is already dead - it's a zombie now and will never be an effective or trustworthy alliance again. Putin won this round.
Europe completely ignoring their own self defense for the last 50 years killed NATO.
The US should withdraw from NATO immediately.
NATO's sole purpose is exploiting the US to babysit the eurotrash.
Saudi Arabia couldn't develop a nuclear program if they tried.
Germany and Canada are in NATO and already have a nuclear umbrella.
What the hell does NATO have to do with Japan, South Korea, or Australia? These countries don't need nukes any more today than they did before the scary orange man got sworn in.
now do Saudi, Japan, Germany, South Korea, Australia, Canada, etc
and NATO is already dead - it's a zombie now and will never be an effective or trustworthy alliance again. Putin won this round.
Europe completely ignoring their own self defense for the last 50 years killed NATO.
The US should withdraw from NATO immediately.
NATO's sole purpose is exploiting the US to babysit the eurotrash.
Saudi Arabia couldn't develop a nuclear program if they tried.
Germany and Canada are in NATO and already have a nuclear umbrella.
What the hell does NATO have to do with Japan, South Korea, or Australia? These countries don't need nukes any more today than they did before the scary orange man got sworn in.
Have to say, it's good news that ETTD has worked on Tesla. It will discourage other important companies from working with the Trumpists. That could be very very good news. 3.75 years to go.
For the reality based community, here's a run-through on why the US and NATO have served to prevent nuclear proliferation around the globe. Trump is forcing every nation that can get nukes to get nukes. No way civilization will long survive a jungle-like nuclear arms race. No way.
The U.S. policy of extended deterrence was born out of the overwhelming conventional threat posed to Western Europe by the Soviet Union at the dawn of the Cold War. To deter Soviet invasion and expansion, the United States extended nuclear deterrence abroad. NATO was created as a nuclear alliance in 1949, with nuclear deterrence made credible by U.S. nuclear forces forward-deployed to NATO serving as the foundation of the collective defense agreement.2 The policy of extended deterrence was not limited to Europe. In the Pacific, to defend against growing threats from China and North Korea, the U.S. nuclear umbrella expanded to include Australia, Japan, and South Korea, with U.S. nuclear weapons forward-deployed to South Korea, though without NATO-style nuclear-sharing arrangements and fully under U.S. control. The policy of extended deterrence remains a key component of the security strategy of the United States and its allies. The 2022 Nuclear Posture Review released by the Joseph R. Biden administration affirms the U.S. commitment to extended deterrence, stating that the United States would “[ensure] our strategic deterrent remains safe, secure, and effective, and our extended deterrence commitments remain strong and credible.”3 Furthermore, allies under the nuclear umbrella have reiterated the importance of relying on the U.S. extended nuclear deterrent for their security. The Secretary General’s 2022 annual report reaffirmed NATO’s status as a nuclear alliance, stating, “As long as nuclear weapons exist, NATO will remain a nuclear alliance.”4 In 2023, the Washington Declaration affirmed that South Korea “has full confidence in U.S. extended deterrence commitments and recognizes the importance, necessity, and benefit of its enduring reliance on the U.S. nuclear deterrent.”5 Japan’s Defense White Paper provides a summary of a U.S.-Japan defense ministerial meeting in which Japan “stated that bilateral efforts at various levels to ensure nuclear deterrence remains credible and resilient [are] more important than ever under the current international security situation.”6 And finally, Australia’s National Defence Strategic Review states, “In our current strategic circumstances, the risk of nuclear escalation must be regarded as real. Our best protection against the risk of nuclear escalation is [U.S.] extended nuclear deterrence.”7
Today, most people do not remember a time when the United States was not allied with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Australia, Japan, and the Republic of Korea. As these alliances span
For the reality based community, here's a run-through on why the US and NATO have served to prevent nuclear proliferation around the globe. Trump is forcing every nation that can get nukes to get nukes. No way civilization will long survive a jungle-like nuclear arms race. No way.
The U.S. policy of extended deterrence was born out of the overwhelming conventional threat posed to Western Europe by the Soviet Union at the dawn of the Cold War. To deter Soviet invasion and expansion, the United States extended nuclear deterrence abroad. NATO was created as a nuclear alliance in 1949, with nuclear deterrence made credible by U.S. nuclear forces forward-deployed to NATO serving as the foundation of the collective defense agreement.2 The policy of extended deterrence was not limited to Europe. In the Pacific, to defend against growing threats from China and North Korea, the U.S. nuclear umbrella expanded to include Australia, Japan, and South Korea, with U.S. nuclear weapons forward-deployed to South Korea, though without NATO-style nuclear-sharing arrangements and fully under U.S. control. The policy of extended deterrence remains a key component of the security strategy of the United States and its allies. The 2022 Nuclear Posture Review released by the Joseph R. Biden administration affirms the U.S. commitment to extended deterrence, stating that the United States would “[ensure] our strategic deterrent remains safe, secure, and effective, and our extended deterrence commitments remain strong and credible.”3 Furthermore, allies under the nuclear umbrella have reiterated the importance of relying on the U.S. extended nuclear deterrent for their security. The Secretary General’s 2022 annual report reaffirmed NATO’s status as a nuclear alliance, stating, “As long as nuclear weapons exist, NATO will remain a nuclear alliance.”4 In 2023, the Washington Declaration affirmed that South Korea “has full confidence in U.S. extended deterrence commitments and recognizes the importance, necessity, and benefit of its enduring reliance on the U.S. nuclear deterrent.”5 Japan’s Defense White Paper provides a summary of a U.S.-Japan defense ministerial meeting in which Japan “stated that bilateral efforts at various levels to ensure nuclear deterrence remains credible and resilient [are] more important than ever under the current international security situation.”6 And finally, Australia’s National Defence Strategic Review states, “In our current strategic circumstances, the risk of nuclear escalation must be regarded as real. Our best protection against the risk of nuclear escalation is [U.S.] extended nuclear deterrence.”7
Trump pulls the US out of the EU led war crimes commission against Russia over the Ukraine invasion. This appears almost in concert with a new Russian effort to invent allegations of Ukrainian war crimes in Kursk in order to hinder ceasefire negotiations. And this may also be part of a wider plan to include in a peace deal a requirement that Ukraine admit that it was the aggressor which would obligate Ukraine to pay reparations to Russia. This may be what Trump meant when he posted about talking to Putin about dividing up Ukraine's "assets". And this is why the peace negotiations are taking place between Russia and the US to the exclusion of the EU. The deal will basically destroy Ukraine's economy and leave the country a sitting duck for the next invasion by Russia, which will likely occur before the end of Trump's term to ensure there is no US support for Ukraine's defense. This deal, if it happens, will make the Motlov-Ribbentrop pact look like a masterclass in drafting an agreement to ensure an enduring peace.
