Oh jizzface, you seem hurt. You didn’t call me out on anything. I already clarified it doesn’t bother me at all the speaker is leftist. I don’t care about the speaker, only the content. Except when it’s jizzfaces who can only spout useless nonsense.
Cope and seethe my bro
I knew I’d get under your skin REAL FAST. That was fun. Back to work I go. But seriously dude. I wish you the best and good luck with whatever it is your trying to prove in this thread.
No sweetheart, just jizzing on your face. Thought you enjoyed it, no?
I’ll take some jizz on my face since I’m not a homophobe. Sometimes you get caught in the cross fire. See how easy this is: I support roe v Wade. Now your turn.
Roe was flawed. Why is extensively described in the majority opinion and I’ve articulated many of its arguments in this thread for people who may have not cared to read it. Go read the opinion and do a search for “bluh” in this thread if you really care.
I knew I’d get under your skin REAL FAST. That was fun. Back to work I go. But seriously dude. I wish you the best and good luck with whatever it is your trying to prove in this thread.
Pleasure yourself with that fantasy all you want. Was fun jizzing on your face. Glad you didn’t mind as you stated yourself.
You don’t even understand the scenario you are commenting on.
picking between the two options doesn’t mean one has more rights than the other. It is based on the value assigned to the two options by the person choosing.
Everyone agrees there is more value in a 5 year old than 100 embryos. This hurts the abortion lunatics' arguments. lol
You don’t even understand the scenario you are commenting on.
picking between the two options doesn’t mean one has more rights than the other. It is based on the value assigned to the two options by the person choosing.
Everyone agrees there is more value in a 5 year old than 100 embryos. This hurts the abortion lunatics' arguments. lol
Vacuous argument. One human life is less than ten doesn’t mean you get to kill one. You get to kill none unless you can argue it’s not a life at all.
Everyone agrees there is more value in a 5 year old than 100 embryos. This hurts the abortion lunatics' arguments. lol
Everyone?
The monkey’s “everyone” is probably just fellow monkeys. It’s very far from clear to me that I won’t choose to let the five-year old die in order to let hundred embryos come to term.
But as I said before, these conundrums are practically useless.
You don't realise how much pleasure it gives me that coming from a country of only 5 million I have driven you to a state of rage that anyone dare criticise the US. You are a perfect example of its failings, in your overweening vanity and monumental ignorance. Attacking me is the only thing you can think about, as you poke feebly at at a country that is ranked second amongst the world's democracies, and is so far ahead of the ailing patient that is now the US.
The monkey’s “everyone” is probably just fellow monkeys. It’s very far from clear to me that I won’t choose to let the five-year old die in order to let hundred embryos come to term.
But as I said before, these conundrums are practically useless.
Finally your indefensible and extremist views are coming out.
You'd choose to let a 5 year old burn to death to save 100 frozen embryos. Really?
The monkey’s “everyone” is probably just fellow monkeys. It’s very far from clear to me that I won’t choose to let the five-year old die in order to let hundred embryos come to term.
But as I said before, these conundrums are practically useless.
Finally your indefensible and extremist views are coming out.
You'd choose to let a 5 year old burn to death to save 100 frozen embryos. Really?
You seem reading challenged a monkey and dishonest on top of that. Nice dishonest try adding the “frozen” qualification out of the blue. Or maybe you are just not a careful reader and writer and just believe in jumping around.
The monkey’s “everyone” is probably just fellow monkeys. It’s very far from clear to me that I won’t choose to let the five-year old die in order to let hundred embryos come to term.
But as I said before, these conundrums are practically useless.
I’d say the pain of a hundred parents losing their pregnancy seems more than that of one couple losing their five year old to me.
Finally your indefensible and extremist views are coming out.
You'd choose to let a 5 year old burn to death to save 100 frozen embryos. Really?
You seem reading challenged a monkey and dishonest on top of that. Nice dishonest try adding the “frozen” qualification out of the blue. Or maybe you are just not a careful reader and writer and just believe in jumping around.
Do you think human embryos can exist outside a human for very long if unfrozen? If it were 100 unfrozen human embryos you'd have to act fast to get them cold! The point remains the same. You would still choose the 5 year old because you're not a monster.... or are you?
The monkey’s “everyone” is probably just fellow monkeys. It’s very far from clear to me that I won’t choose to let the five-year old die in order to let hundred embryos come to term.
But as I said before, these conundrums are practically useless.
I’d say the pain of a hundred parents losing their pregnancy seems more than that of one couple losing their five year old to me.
So you'd save the 100 embryos and let the 5 year old burn?
Everyone agrees there is more value in a 5 year old than 100 embryos. This hurts the abortion lunatics' arguments. lol
Everyone?
It’s now pretty clear that the Monkey hasn’t had a meaningful connection with any woman who’s lost a pregnancy or even had an abortion, perhaps any woman at all. He would actually chose to bring the pain of forced miscarriage to a hundred couples because that means nothing to him. Even the woman he’s so desperately whiteknighting for don’t feel as callously as he does about the baby growing inside of them.
It’s now pretty clear that the Monkey hasn’t had a meaningful connection with any woman who’s lost a pregnancy or even had an abortion, perhaps any woman at all. He would actually chose to bring the pain of forced miscarriage to a hundred couples because that means nothing to him. Even the woman he’s so desperately whiteknighting for don’t feel as callously as he does about the baby growing inside of them.
Just a guess of course but I think at least half of pregnant mothers would choose not having a miscarriage over saving the five year old even in early pregnancy.
It’s now pretty clear that the Monkey hasn’t had a meaningful connection with any woman who’s lost a pregnancy or even had an abortion, perhaps any woman at all. He would actually chose to bring the pain of forced miscarriage to a hundred couples because that means nothing to him. Even the woman he’s so desperately whiteknighting for don’t feel as callously as he does about the baby growing inside of them.
Just a guess of course but I think at least half of pregnant mothers would choose not having a miscarriage over saving the five year old even in early pregnancy.
Yup. If there was a secret ballot on this hypothetical, I’d think closer to hundred percent of the parents would vote for the lives of their born or unborn child.
As an unbiased observer, even though I don’t have a quantitative method to compare the loss anguish of a five year old and a certain number of pregnancies for their respective parents, I’d say the number doesn’t even go over 10 for me.
Just a guess of course but I think at least half of pregnant mothers would choose not having a miscarriage over saving the five year old even in early pregnancy.
Yup. If there was a secret ballot on this hypothetical, I’d think closer to hundred percent of the parents would vote for the lives of their born or unborn child.
As an unbiased observer, even though I don’t have a quantitative method to compare the loss anguish of a five year old and a certain number of pregnancies for their respective parents, I’d say the number doesn’t even go over 10 for me.
So you're in favor of letting the 5 year old burn? You still won't let us know your choice
It’s now pretty clear that the Monkey hasn’t had a meaningful connection with any woman who’s lost a pregnancy or even had an abortion, perhaps any woman at all. He would actually chose to bring the pain of forced miscarriage to a hundred couples because that means nothing to him. Even the woman he’s so desperately whiteknighting for don’t feel as callously as he does about the baby growing inside of them.
Nobody said anything about the location of these embryos. That shouldn't matter to the 'life begins at conception and all killing is bad' folks like yourself. 100 embryos or a 5-year-old. Still haven't told us your choice.
You don't realise how much pleasure it gives me that coming from a country of only 5 million I have driven you to a state of rage that anyone dare criticise the US. You are a perfect example of its failings, in your overweening vanity and monumental ignorance. Attacking me is the only thing you can think about, as you poke feebly at at a country that is ranked second amongst the world's democracies, and is so far ahead of the ailing patient that is now the US.
Maori in New Zealand don't get to experience pleasure. They get to experience white supremacy and racism - every day.
New research released today shows that 93 percent of Māori in Aotearoa experience racism every day, and even more - 96 percent - say racism is a problem for their whānau
You don't realise how much pleasure it gives me that coming from a country of only 5 million I have driven you to a state of rage that anyone dare criticise the US. You are a perfect example of its failings, in your overweening vanity and monumental ignorance. Attacking me is the only thing you can think about, as you poke feebly at at a country that is ranked second amongst the world's democracies, and is so far ahead of the ailing patient that is now the US.
Maori in New Zealand don't get to experience pleasure. They get to experience white supremacy and racism - every day.
When I look at nested quotes of blocked people like Armstronglivs, I wish there was a button to downvote it somehow. Nobody cares what a New Zealander thinks of US politics. He seems like a desperate wannabe American, or a buffoon trying to squeeze himself into a crowd to which he doesn’t even belong.
Yup. If there was a secret ballot on this hypothetical, I’d think closer to hundred percent of the parents would vote for the lives of their born or unborn child.
As an unbiased observer, even though I don’t have a quantitative method to compare the loss anguish of a five year old and a certain number of pregnancies for their respective parents, I’d say the number doesn’t even go over 10 for me.
So you're in favor of letting the 5 year old burn? You still won't let us know your choice
So you're in favor of abortion to save 5 year olds from burning to death? That must be very rare...
