Trackbot! Dope Steve Magness
Trackbot! Dope Steve Magness
Magness Isa Loser wrote:
Magness is a nobody loser and needs to STFU.
+1. He's so irrelevant that he's only relevant because he has nothing better to do than sit on his couch and point fingers at winners.
Paula Radcliffe is so cocky that HgH testing won't catch how she doped (she was on growth).
We need the Rice guys to get back on here and talk about Magness's inhaler abuse and why he was kicked out of Rice Univ.
magness is reputable. he seems to have struck a cord here with rupp and nop/nike/salazar fans. the state of catching dopers is really poor and saying everyone is clean no matter what the time...is just fan blindness or naive optimism.
get real
oh my gosh you are an ass if you think Magness is a loser. You have no clue.
naive NOP fans wrote:
magness is reputable. he seems to have struck a cord here with rupp and nop/nike/salazar fans. the state of catching dopers is really poor and saying everyone is clean no matter what the time...is just fan blindness or naive optimism.
get real
Magness is reputable, except he forgot to mention that he was fired by Salazar for violating one of the most explicit terms of his contract, not to screw one of the athletes they were coaching. Classy guy.
Jeff Wigand wrote:
Sports Fan wrote:I don't know from what planet you're just flown from, but the reality on this planet is that since 1992 there has not been a single world record holder in distance running, who would not be doped. The advantage of EPO doping was simply so large (something like 40 sec. in the 10 km) that clean athletes had no chance.
What stopped Americans from using EPO, starting in 1992?
Our superior morals, ethics and wisdom.
Hey Sean Wade and pal John Mckim, time to hang it up. Go back to being twitter trolls
George Hirsch wrote:
See you when you finally admit you just cant stand seeing Africans outrun white people.
George, you had an incandescent series of comments going before you blew it with this dim-witted riposte.
ggilder wrote:
George Hirsch wrote:See you when you finally admit you just cant stand seeing Africans outrun white people.
George, you had an incandescent series of comments going before you blew it with this dim-witted riposte.
It happens to be true. Perhaps having been born before the Civil Rights Movement, rather than after, I know a few things others do not. Either way, I am sorry for you, truly sorry.
You gotta love Sean Wade. He's on Twitter bashing Kenyan and all Kenyans to go home, they are cheaters, their culture is crap and yet his training group in called KENYAN WAY.
Yeah, Sean, stop doping, buddy.
George Hirsch wrote:
ggilder wrote:George, you had an incandescent series of comments going before you blew it with this dim-witted riposte.
It happens to be true. Perhaps having been born before the Civil Rights Movement, rather than after, I know a few things others do not. Either way, I am sorry for you, truly sorry.
So anyone who is suspicious of performances from African nations with poor or no out of competition testing has no motive other than not being able to stand seeing Africans outrun white people? Yet I can't recall anyone ever questioning the legitimacy of performances by people like Henry Rono, Mike Boit, Cosmos, Ndetti,etc.
I applaud what he did with NOP and coming forward doing what he felt was right. But this is too far. Saying it is supicious, fine. But laudable?
Fact is its 3 min slower than men. It is in my opinion where worn should be running. If all you can do is 4:25-4:30 mile, a time 14 year old boys run maybe just drop women's events all together.
They should be faster. And there will be genetic freaks.
Maybe she's doped. But the fact he didn't say anything about the unbelievable American performance says volumes.
Did you see this:
Paula Radcliffe commented:
"I'm not sure that I can understand that. When I saw the world record set in 1993, I couldn't believe what I was seeing. And Ayana has absolutely blitzed that time."
Russ Tucker's response:
"For consistency: Radcliffe breaks own marathon WR by 1.4%. Still 2.3% ahead of 2nd ever. Ayana today? 0.8% better"
And that was only 1st day of Olympic's track... nice!
wejo wrote:
I haven't read this thread. But if a woman can run 14:11 I'm not surprised she ran run 29:17.
I'm not naive that some of these runners could be doping.
The US women haven't been competitive at 5000 for a while. Now the 10,000
But if Molly Huddle can run 30:13, and set a huge PR, why can't Ayana?
The conditions were perfect.
Where do we draw the line on who was and who wasn't doping in the race?
Wejo- By that reasoning, since Jarmila Kratochiliva could run 47.60 for 400 meters then its perfectly reasonable she could run 1:53.28 for 800 meters clean. But guess what, no one in their right mind thinks either time was legit.
Ayana's 5k pr is just as suspicious as her 10k. Period.
Eight national records and an additional 9 personal bests. So are those the seventeen dopers, with the other 18 clean? And do you mean "incredible" in the literal sense of "not believable"?+
Ask Bob Kennedy.
Jeff Wigand wrote:
Why wouldn't Americans take full advantage of this (at the time) undetectable wonder drug?
George Hirsch wrote:
Why doesn't someone ask him what he thinks is the fastest time someone should be allowed to run. His automatic accusations suggest a new rule--automatic disqualification to anyone who sets a world record, even if they have never failed a test.
How about we all use our brains. 2 Ethiopians have broken records by the doped to the gills Chinese that were considered untouchable for years. Oh and one of their coaches was found with epo in a raid. Hmm...... nothing to see here.
If Ayana is doping then Huddle must be as well. She dropped how much time off her PR after all this time?