When I do pass the bar I might just find a way to sue this site out of vindictiveness just because of how blatantly transphobic the posters are and how the site administrators sit by idly while people post hateful, bigotted, transphobic, anti-LGBT comments. Even moreso, the attacks are aimed at a child, so this constitutes a form of cyberbullying. Don't let your fingers write a check on your keyboard that you can't cash.
she is 18. get facts right.
markschultz25 wrote:
When I do pass the bar I might just find a way to sue this site out of vindictiveness just because of how blatantly transphobic the posters are and how the site administrators sit by idly while people post hateful, bigotted, transphobic, anti-LGBT comments. Even moreso, the attacks are aimed at a child, so this constitutes a form of cyberbullying. Don't let your fingers write a check on your keyboard that you can't cash.
Your law career shouldn't commence before you have taken a course in constitutional law. In the U.S. "Hate speech" (your term not mine) is protected speech unless it creates a clear and present danger of violence (not possible on a message board).
markschultz25 wrote:
My post is meant to remedy the situation of rampant discrimination and transphobia on this website. Therefore, you cannot make an argument that I'm the offensive one. The law dictates what offensive and disciminatory hate speech consists of. My post is the antithesis of hate speech.
Don't try to argue with me as I am currently a 2nd year law student at Levin College of Law at UF in Gainesville. Do not, I repeat DO NOT, try to tell me what is legal and what isn.t.
markschultz25 wrote:
If you all don't stop the transphobic ranting on here, I will draw attention to this website and work with all of the LGBT organizations and ACLU lawyers to get this site removed from the Internet for promoting discrimination, hate, and intolerance of those who simply want to live their lives in peace without being distracted and having to constantly watch over their back because bigots who hold on to some primitive way of thinking, usually fostered by religion, want to treat them as second class citizens when they are no different from you or I.
That seems an apt 'cause' for the American CIVIL LIBERTIES Union.
Who are you to speciously misuse that organizations name?
markschultz25 wrote:
When I do pass the bar I might just find a way to sue this site out of vindictiveness just because of how blatantly transphobic the posters are and how the site administrators sit by idly while people post hateful, bigotted, transphobic, anti-LGBT comments. Even moreso, the attacks are aimed at a child, so this constitutes a form of cyberbullying. Don't let your fingers write a check on your keyboard that you can't cash.
0/10
Calling bullshit that you're really a Gator also; if so, tell me why students in Gainseville often drive to Micanopy.
markschultz25 wrote:
My post is meant to remedy the situation of rampant discrimination and transphobia on this website. Therefore, you cannot make an argument that I'm the offensive one. The law dictates what offensive and disciminatory hate speech consists of. My post is the antithesis of hate speech.
Don't try to argue with me as I am currently a 2nd year law student at Levin College of Law at UF in Gainesville. Do not, I repeat DO NOT, try to tell me what is legal and what isn.t.
I am one of the Supreme Court Justices. (I do not want to say which one.) Since you are only a mere law student I can safely say that you don't have a clue what is legal or illegal.
Actually, you do present a clear and present danger on the message board because you can access the messageboard from a mobile device. Given that you're a track enthusiast, I can argue that you would then be at a track meet that the victim is participating in, while on here making hateful, bigotted remarks via your mobile device, and thus you present as a clear and present danger.
notrump wrote:
Your law career shouldn't commence before you have taken a course in constitutional law. In the U.S. "Hate speech" (your term not mine) is protected speech unless it creates a clear and present danger of violence (not possible on a message board).
markschultz25 wrote:My post is meant to remedy the situation of rampant discrimination and transphobia on this website. Therefore, you cannot make an argument that I'm the offensive one. The law dictates what offensive and disciminatory hate speech consists of. My post is the antithesis of hate speech.
Don't try to argue with me as I am currently a 2nd year law student at Levin College of Law at UF in Gainesville. Do not, I repeat DO NOT, try to tell me what is legal and what isn.t.
Blah Blah
I am one of the Supreme Court Justices. (I do not want to say which one.) Since you are only a mere law student I can safely say that you don't have a clue what is legal or illegal.
Lol
markschultz25 wrote:
When I do pass the bar I might just find a way to sue this site out of vindictiveness just because of how blatantly transphobic the posters are and how the site administrators sit by idly while people post hateful, bigotted, transphobic, anti-LGBT comments. Even moreso, the attacks are aimed at a child, so this constitutes a form of cyberbullying. Don't let your fingers write a check on your keyboard that you can't cash.
Just because we are are against trans-confused dudes competing against women, doesn't make us bigoted or hateful. It's just wrong and way out of bounds. You are one intolerable if not close-minded SJW. You make wtfunny who the most outspoken gay on LRC look calm and reserved. This transgender issue as it affects women's sports is already being abused, just as predicted in that other thread.
markschultz25 wrote:
Actually, you do present a clear and present danger on the message board because you can access the messageboard from a mobile device. Given that you're a track enthusiast, I can argue that you would then be at a track meet that the victim is participating in, while on here making hateful, bigotted remarks via your mobile device, and thus you present as a clear and present danger.
Actually, you've just confirmed you're a troll, not a second year law student.
But my 'Trollometer' scored you fairly high, 8/10. Well done, good effort, not easy to get past the LRC troll meisters.
markschultz25 wrote:
Actually, you do present a clear and present danger on the message board because you can access the messageboard from a mobile device. Given that you're a track enthusiast, I can argue that you would then be at a track meet that the victim is participating in, while on here making hateful, bigotted remarks via your mobile device, and thus you present as a clear and present danger.
My friend, if you are a second year law student (which I very much doubt) you need to learn the spelling of the word 'bigoted' as it's probably a written word you'll be using a lot in future years judging by your leanings.
The Constitution doesn't carve out an exception for "phobia speech limit " whereby anyone who says things that the lgbt lobby groups (who are also not mentioned in the first amendment ) deem as speech which is no good, becomes a criminal. There's no constitutional enumeration of "these views are out of bounds". There are no bounds on political viewpoints. There is no such thing as hate speech unless it's in 1984 volume II aka big brother returns. Transphobia's completely legal. Not that anyone here is actually transphobic
I am wearing a bra n panties by the way. I identify as little richard
This is all hysterically funny.
Millenials can't work full time jobs because they don't have time for their naps.
Boys will be boys unless they think they're girls.
Law students and trolls are essentially the same animal.
Donald Trump or Hilary Clinton will be our next President.
Can't find a race to run for less than $40.
And the Brojos still haven't found real jobs.
Back in my day when a male snuck into the women's bathrooms, we cheered. When he snuck onto the women's cheerleading troop we called it gay. And if he went in the women's relay we called that cheating
P.s.
Kilroy waz here
I think the whole special bathroom thing is a conspiracy hatched by the plumbers and ceramic tile setters unions.
robert678 wrote:
so you're saying in HS I could have just worn women's clothes and make up and said I identified as a woman and won a state cross country title and gotten a full-ride athletic scholarship?
People indoctrinated into the PC narrative are incapable of recognizing the fallibility of human nature... it is against their religion. They all honestly believe that no one would ever exploit these types of situations. It's like with the bathrooms... no one wants to hurt the feelings of transgendered persons, but some creeps are going to exploit an ability to get into the women's restroom. Same thing with this whole transgenders in sports debate. Most people's beliefs are simply a collection of socially expedient opinions they've heard other people articulate. It is only natural that someone's subconscious will see an opportunity for social and material expedience and thus convince the consciousness that they were a girl all along. If we incentivize Transgenderism by making it the PC cause du jour then the rates of gender dysmorphia will undoubtedly go up as they certainly have in the last decade.
What's really behind all this nonsense is the leftist march through the institutions. If gender is made something distinct from biological sex., aka something one can choose as an identity, then the whole notion of the family is drawn into question. If it becomes against the law to call a man a man if he so chooses then it is not much of a leap to mandate an opinion that all gender is a social construct. This will pave the way for the government's intrusion into private life and the eventual erosion of the private family structure upon which all free society is based. Uncle Sam is already the dad to many young people in America and in the not too distant future he will be cis male mimetic role model to all of them.
Letsrun is OBSESSED with transgender and intersex issues. I'll bet there is more interest here in this individual than on any LGBT forum. 160+ posts lol. I don't think running is popular around here at all to be honest.
Really amuses me. Why does everyone care so much? All the road races you lot trot round are mixed anyway!
arnsheldon wrote:
Big Red wrote:This is tricky stuff.
I support trans people. I'd pee in North Carolina in the Ladies in a dress any day of the week.
But I'm unable to see how a MTF trans person could compete fairly against girls/women?
The only way it would be fair is if they were post-op, and on female hormones. In other words, no testosterone produced by their nuggets in the system, because they no longer have nuggets.
I don't have the scientific knowledge to say much more. Do women naturally produce any testosterone? Maybe a bit? I just don't know.
The biggest here will be the acceptance of transgender people in all of society thus allowing transgender children to come out at a young age. There are six/seven year olds who identify as the other gender and through therapy can better verbalize it and begin living in a way that they feel most comfortable (ex Going to school as biological gender but at home they can dress as they wish). Then this prevents a MTF transgender from going through puberty if they get on hormone treatments early enough. This will prevent much of the testosterone added advantage that occurs in pubescent boys (growing muscles, etc) and thus even playing field (theoretically).
You are advocating for giving life-changing chemicals to children because they have psychological illnesses?! This is child abuse! How can this be considered a good or viable thing? It is extremely horrifying to anyone with a basic understanding of endocrinology. What happened to breaking down gender roles? Now we are reinforcing them by telling feminine boys or masculine girls that they can magically change sex. These hormones cause permanent damage to the people taking them, particularly those taking them prior to puberty. The media will obfuscate this due to their PC agenda, but they will also simultaneously argue that male body-builders shouldn't juice. Same reason many major municipalities have tons of estrogen in the water supply now. Women are better citizens of the brave new world.
Horrifying wrote:
arnsheldon wrote:The biggest here will be the acceptance of transgender people in all of society thus allowing transgender children to come out at a young age. There are six/seven year olds who identify as the other gender and through therapy can better verbalize it and begin living in a way that they feel most comfortable (ex Going to school as biological gender but at home they can dress as they wish). Then this prevents a MTF transgender from going through puberty if they get on hormone treatments early enough. This will prevent much of the testosterone added advantage that occurs in pubescent boys (growing muscles, etc) and thus even playing field (theoretically).
You are advocating for giving life-changing chemicals to children because they have psychological illnesses?! This is child abuse! How can this be considered a good or viable thing? It is extremely horrifying to anyone with a basic understanding of endocrinology. What happened to breaking down gender roles? Now we are reinforcing them by telling feminine boys or masculine girls that they can magically change sex. These hormones cause permanent damage to the people taking them, particularly those taking them prior to puberty. The media will obfuscate this due to their PC agenda, but they will also simultaneously argue that male body-builders shouldn't juice. Same reason many major municipalities have tons of estrogen in the water supply now. Women are better citizens of the brave new world.
They do not cause permanent damage as far I've heard- they are reversible though majority will stay on them until they can afford/are ready for surgery. Please read this article:
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/puberty-suppression-for-t_b_5823698.htmlJustice URL Warren wrote:
markschultz25 wrote:When I do pass the bar I might just find a way to sue this site out of vindictiveness just because of how blatantly transphobic the posters are and how the site administrators sit by idly while people post hateful, bigotted, transphobic, anti-LGBT comments. Even moreso, the attacks are aimed at a child, so this constitutes a form of cyberbullying. Don't let your fingers write a check on your keyboard that you can't cash.
0/10
Calling bullshit that you're really a Gator also; if so, tell me why students in Gainseville often drive to Micanopy.
0/10? This deserves at least a 7/10. He got a bunch of responses when this is so obviously a troll. Becoming a lawyer and sueing this site for being transphobic? That isn't half bad.