Greg, you're late to the party. It's already been established that Dahl did not travel to DC with the intent of fighting but he was there. The published reports were conflicting, but I would tend to support Dahl's version over Mendoza's. Mendoza thought he could intimidate Dahl because of Dahl's gangsta-injun persona. Both have had run-ins with the law. The only issue is who started the PHYSICAL altercation by spitting/striking the other? I think the legal system correctly adjudicated the matter by putting the case on ice.
hey malmo,
why don't you give an honest review of the screenplay? I could email you an updated edited version. You think it's no good but that's not much of a critique. You should expand on your criticism for it to carry weight.
I am ok with you posting your critique of the screenplay in the forums.
I think it's a tremendous screenplay.
Also - I think it's appalling if the said poster is responsible for spamming the board saying nasty things about others - like NICO. Maybe he resorts to this behaviour because he is upset when banned and it's his way of lashing out.
I think he is a well intentioned person who may have struggles adapting to the world.
I start those virtue signalling threads for fun. You have to know in the back of your mind that I am trolling. Of course I don't take them too seriously.
And yes I did accuse you of being a stalker - but that was in the past. The stalking on this forum is so creepy that I had to consider the possibility it was a moderator.
I was going to take this down because its spamming the thread. But for you I'll leave it up.
I really don't have any interest in reviewing your screenplay, but if you send it to me again I'll read it. Maybe then I'll see why you're so inspired by yourself.
Well you've finally accepted I'm not part of those azzholes who are harassing you. That's a positive. I don't even understand why they're doing it.
Earlier you asked me to provide an example of my "copyrighted" work. I have no idea why you would request that? I don't think you really understand what copyright is or how it works? Any intellectual property you produce is automatically copyrighted before the ink drys. There is no formal action required.
I'll humor you though. Here's mine: Ode to Alexi I've always wanted to be one of the leaves but leaves are not like people Leaves change but people don't well, some people change but not like leaves Leaves fall, in the fall which is also called autumn people fall sometimes but not like leaves When people fall they get up leaves don't get up not like people They just lie there like leaves and just die there we bereave just like celebrities in threes Some people are called autumn but not leaves leaves are called leaves Most people called autumn are strippers whose panties fall down like leaves leaving them bare like trees in autumn
I have others: A Letter to Helmut and VO2Max Doesn't Mean Anything
Someone was accusing him. Whether they had evidence or were just trying to get him riled up, I don't know.
I think the controversy stems from Dahl using multiple handles. This person seems to believe he posted about the athlete in question on another handle. Dahl vehemently denies this, even when no one is bringing it up, but he isn't above lying on letsrun, so who knows.
So you are determined to continue lying and masquerading as someone you are not in regards to your education, profession, and athletic accomplishments?
Someone was accusing him. Whether they had evidence or were just trying to get him riled up, I don't know.
I think the controversy stems from Dahl using multiple handles. This person seems to believe he posted about the athlete in question on another handle. Dahl vehemently denies this, even when no one is bringing it up, but he isn't above lying on letsrun, so who knows.
I made a video on the issue with leechmans. It's the new video on my youtube channel Barrett Dahl.
For the record, at this point, I DO believe it is the user malmo who harrasses Greg. There may be a maximum of 1 other person playing along, but I think it's MOSTLY him.
What I cannot figure out is why Greg thinks the guy lives in West Virginia. Is that where malmo is based? At this point who cares.
I don't have a dog in the spamming allegations against BD, although if wejo says it I'm inclined to believe it.
However I did notice that BD addresses the allegation that he harassed that young San Antonio runner on this site and he vehemently denied it.
Was there ever any evidence that he did that or was someone falsely accusing him?
You notice we haven't had a Nico Young attack in 2-3 weeks? It's not a coincidence.
Yes, Dahl has denied harassing a young female runner. He blamed me for it. Also stopped recently.
When I confronted him last week about his history of mass spam attacks, suddenly the Charlie Maguire attack appeared.
Also, on this thread he has been using multiple sock-puppets to fabricate support. Always multiple upvotes within seconds. Everyone sees though this crap. Nobody supports him.
Dahl, we care about you. When we tell you to seek professional help it's not a veiled insult. It's real. It's honest. This sh//it has got to end. It doesn't do you one bit of good to continue on this way.
For the record, at this point, I DO believe it is the user malmo who harrasses Greg. There may be a maximum of 1 other person playing along, but I think it's MOSTLY him.
What I cannot figure out is why Greg thinks the guy lives in West Virginia. Is that where malmo is based? At this point who cares.
Leave me out of your delusional drama. I've been Greg's guardian angel.
Someone was accusing him. Whether they had evidence or were just trying to get him riled up, I don't know.
I think the controversy stems from Dahl using multiple handles. This person seems to believe he posted about the athlete in question on another handle. Dahl vehemently denies this, even when no one is bringing it up, but he isn't above lying on letsrun, so who knows.