Khamis wrote:
Look dearest rekrunner, you may have a better liking for me if you simply drop all your baggage and follow me the rest of your life! Why do you wanna argue with me if you can just follow me in brotherly love?
Didn't I already say to you how many damn times that there is no demand or requirement in this world by Scripture or by Science or any other school of thought that a good coach needs to have been a good runner himself subject to the varying meanings and definitions of 'good' in good coach and good runner respectively!!!
So why the heck are you still asking me the same damn question about whether Eric Dollard and Konstantine Meyl needs to have been runners themselves or trained runners in order to give an insight about sport performance or the susceptibility of altitude training in sport performance????
To a greater extent, why the heck are you still asking me whether it is required for there to have been sports science research in the past tense directly relating sport performance to exposure to anthropogenic RF and EMF in order for you to come to any decision or conclusion about whether the former is affected, if at all, by the latter????
Why, why, why???????????????
Which man, woman, Professor, or Rojo or otherwise taught you such nonsense?????
Which fool said that there needs to be explicit mention of anthropogenic RF and EMF affecting, if at all, sport performance in the past tense first before I, Khamis the RF King, or Eric Dollard, or Konstantine Meyl or any other persons can also say the same????
Can't we RF Kings and experts responsibly and dutifully INTERPRET already available objective or otherwise facts and discoveries surrounding anthropogenic RF and EMF and human health in the literature??
Why must we RF Kings REGURGITATE already existing research or science relating sports performance and anthropogenic RF and EMF exposure rather than INTERPRET????
Why must you, dear rekrunner, expect me a full RF King with overflowing and bursting logical and reasoning powers of deduction, induction and abduction to create, to invent, to interpret, to advance, to make way, to forge ahead, to surpass merely regurgitate and/or even plagiarize/copy researches in the past tense to humor you??????
What kind of person do you suppose I am for treating me with such disdain????
I'm even forced by you against my desire to regurgitate and vomit out some other MD Dr Jill Carnahan just so that you feel fanciful about it???? You think I can't interpret or create better than Dr Jill as RF King?
I think I explained why. What is missing in all your posts is any knowledgeable discussion of sport performance. No amount of RF-expert name-dropping, or reference to scriptures, cures this omission.
I don't demand 100% evidence, but right now you are at 0%. You said objectivity+subjectivity is best -- bring me some objectivity then, and I will supply my own subjectivity.
