You are talking to a white supremacist. Facts won’t shake his faith in his imagined narrative, one that views the world as a simple dichotomy: white people who created all modern civilization and the rest of the world that’s all uncivilized barbarians.
Nothing I have said is racist. That the native peoples of Europe are being replaced is a demographic fact, and at a rate which makes integration difficult if not impossible (not helped by the left screaming racist at any discussion of problems in the Muslim or black communities). I don't subscribe to the belief that it's part of any 'grand design', although it is partly driven by the left's desire to increase their voting base (as well as cheap foreign labor). European people's did create most of the modern world, including the concepts of 'racism' that you're abusing to throw at me. I understand that you're upset that another one of your 'natural born off shoots of humanity' has been exposed as a doping cheat this week, and another (Mo) is about to be exposed as a complete and utter liar, but please don't take it out on me.
I can't bring myself to care too much. The documentary was confusing, but at least he was able to attend school from a young age and escape his situation at a young age (and become a successful and wealthy sportsperson in the process). According to the documentary there are 100,000 trafficked people in the UK... successive government have let anyone and everyone into the country.
I need some careers advice so I can get out myself before things get worse...
I for one cheer this whole nefarious scheme to replace you. Whoever thought it up, though, on the large scale must be mentally incompetent. Can't the majority population simply reproduce at rates closer to immigration/immigrants to stop this ingenious plot? Europeans choose not to have more than one child on average. That's all on you if people are drawn to the country to take the jobs you are leaving open as a result of your 1.2-1.7 per couple birthrates.
Lol at these no-job-having uneducated lazy unqualified illiterates thinking countries in the rest of the world want them just because of their white skin.
I for one cheer this whole nefarious scheme to replace you. Whoever thought it up, though, on the large scale must be mentally incompetent. Can't the majority population simply reproduce at rates closer to immigration/immigrants to stop this ingenious plot? Europeans choose not to have more than one child on average. That's all on you if people are drawn to the country to take the jobs you are leaving open as a result of your 1.2-1.7 per couple birthrates.
It seems to be you racist obsessed peeps that are bringing up conspiracy theories. But to answer your 'point', raising native European birth rates would likely require making feminism illegal, banning abortion, putting women back in the kitchen etc. You could give huge financial incentives, but that would likely just mean the poorer immigrant populations taking advantage of it and having even more children. The only reasonable solution would be to be more vocal about the lack of women's rights in Islam etc, and trying to reduce the birth rate of the immigrant populations, but of course leftists would scream 'racist!' and 'islamaphobe!' if anyone tried that. I think on the whole you middle-class white leftists secretly pine for 7th century Sharia Law, women put in their place, being allowed to marry multiple submissive teenage girls etc. Michael Houellebecq wrote a brilliant novel that conveyed this.
amazon.co.uk
Buy Submission by Houellebecq, Michel from Amazon's Fiction Books Store. Everyday low prices on a huge range of new releases and classic fiction.
I need some careers advice so I can get out myself before things get worse...
Russia will take you.
I have degrees in physics and nuclear science so I could try and work in their nuclear industry. Ironically it would probably be easier to get a job there than getting on a graduate scheme in the UK.
Lol at these no-job-having uneducated lazy unqualified illiterates thinking countries in the rest of the world want them just because of their white skin.
Are you talking to me? You are making some big assumptions there, considering you don't know who the hell I am! All you have to go off is what I'm writing on an anonymous message board.
I think on the whole you middle-class white leftists secretly pine for 7th century Sharia Law, women put in their place, being allowed to marry multiple submissive teenage girls etc.
Based on what? Your many layers of personal delusion?
Of course this thread had to devolve into a racist troll fest. And this despite the thread being about one of a tiny number of distance running GOATS, The GOAT by some measures, for whom you’d think a running forum would be one place with universal support and sympathy for getting the burden he’s been holding from childhood off his chest.
Mo Farah is unpopular amongst some because he is constantly pushed by the BBC as being part of their "woke" agenda and is allowed to get away with conduct that would result in disciplinary action amongst other athletes. He also has never been required to do the community work that seemingly forms part of every other funded athletes' programmes. Mo is never to be found supporting grass roots athletes or encouraging children in schools to engage with sport; but he is to be found in newspaper headlines for non-running related matters. He does seem to seek out publicity and I think many people feel he is somewhat narcissistic and more interested in headlines and drawing attention to himself than anything else. Therefore, some may greet the latest headline with rolled eyes and wonder if its more about Mo cashing in to boost a declining career than a genuine concern. There seems little point in publicising it otherwise - its not from the perspective that he is raising awareness of the issue to help others who might be in the same situation.
Being a psychologist, I find it fairly evident that Mo displays some form of pd and this may make his behaviour seem odd or erratic to some. I wouldn't dream of diagnosing him on the internet but the fact that he is not universally popular (and he is still extremely popular) in the UK is probably due to him displaying traits of behavioural issues. Those same people would react in exactly the same way to a white British male and indeed in the case of the BBC, etc would probably not give him anywhere near the same level of coverage or sympathy.
You make some interesting points but stripped of any narcissism, narrative exaggeration on MF's part, BBC wokedom and MF publicity hunt, the very basics that UK's highest ever achieving track and field athlete was likely a victim of some form of trafficking is surely of large enough national human interest that the BBC decided to present [a version of] the story in its own right. I think much of the UK antipathy (within the sport,) to MF is not directly linked to drug suspicions but to him simply seeming to be a rather dull, selfish and narrow person with little insight to add to his extraordinary medal haul. And yes, I realise that if one's had a really tough and traumatising childhood and come away with 10 global endurance running golds, it's maybe a bit of an ask to also be an authority on much else before age 40.