I'm sure the red states that don't allow abortion will have no problem coughing up the extra hundred million $ or so, per year, for the new welfare, AFDC, and unemployment claims from unwed mothers that will result in their state. Of course, it will increase every year while a new year's batch of unwed mothers file claims. It should level off at some billions of never-ending new state expenses after 20 years or so.
I don't really know much about the healthcare costs that will be incurred, but I would imagine unwed mothers (who tend to be poor) will end up at the county hospital needing care they can't pay for. The average pregnancy cost is roughly $13,000, more for pre and post natal, so another 5,000 of those a year for your state is only $65,000,000 for the government to cough up.
That's such a small price to pay! You did plan on your state income taxes going up to pay for all this, right? Maybe the federal government will bail you out (that is, the blue states.)
But your state can always budget for some new law enforcement to go after deadbeat dads more seriously. Otherwise the cost to the state budget will be rather alarming. Oh, wait, more law enforcement costs tax dollars.
How about bringing back "shotgun weddings"? I always thought those were cute in the cartoons when I was a kid! If dad won't hold the shotgun, maybe the police will do it for him? A court order to get married might work!
You "pro-lifers" did have a plan for all of these expenses, right? Unwed mothers are only assumed to cost the government at least $112 billion nationwide in 2008. You want another few hundred thousand pregnancies and babies a year, with an unwilling parent, most of them young and broke-- so you have a realistic plan for making sure they and their mothers are well taken care of, right? I want to hear it!
While we're taking control of people's bodies, how about mandatory DNA databases for all men in order to find dad, and mandatory vasectomies for deadbeat dads? That should help!