No. They know she doped but they do not think doping is cheating given the state of the sport. Do people think Gidey ran 14:06 clean or that it was the shoes? Do they think Hasan could fall down, get up and run down other world class runners like they were standing still based on natural ability? Of course not. BTC cheated the same way US Postal and Sky cheated because everyone else is cheating with them. Do people think Schweizer was clean when she ran 14:26? Or that Houlihan went rogue?
The thing is virtually every top US pro shows the same pattern because college acts like a doping breakwater. With Houlihan we had the moved up/undertrained excuse but that does not come close to explain her post-college improvement. We have all heard the other litany of excuses. But realistically when we see massive improvements and the sudden ability to run elite level times never previously evidenced in an athlete's competitive history, that is not talent or magic genes. It is chemistry. Think of the swimmer Michelle Smith, who went from mediocrity to Olympic gold medalist and record breaker relatively late in her career. It was perfectly obvious. It almost always is.
As long as it stays in its lane I do not care too much about professional doping. The genie was out of the bottle very long ago. I do not blame the athletes who have to make rotten choices to have a chance to compete. But it bothers me when it skews our understanding of the sport and how we treat up and coming athletes based on the very flawed assumptions that doping has created. You were not born yesterday. Doping is easy to spot if you are looking for it.