Kiln explosion wrote:
Salvitore Stitchmo wrote:
Nobody should have an issue with this. Nikki can make the choice to identify however they (I guess that's now the pronoun even though grammatically incorrect) want to.
But they are biologically a female, and I suspect that if Nikki had to make a choice in which sporting gender category they competed it, they would choose the womans category for very obvious reasons - reasons which I don't really need to point out right.
Good for Nikki.
Are you sure? Can she identify, then, as a member of another species? Can she identify under pronouns such as she/they or he/they or even simply they? If so, might we be required to provide her with multiple ballots in elections?
It is far, far, far easier to believe that so-called "transgender persons" suffer from very, very, very confused thinking rather than that they were born into the wrong bodies.
Yes I am 100% sure she can make that choice. It's her business and not mine. Has zero impact on my life and it has none on yours. I'm a guy - will I ever make that choice? I doubt it - but I haven't lived a second in her shoes so I have no idea any of the components and nuances that have led to this decision for them (grammar...ugh).
Either way more point was really that despite this, gender classification in sport still needs to exist and just because it would in practicality be okay for Nikki Hiltz to compete in the mens category, she never will because that would be really disadvantageous for her and this alone validates the concept of gender diversification that needs to work in both directions.