^ just another butthurt trumper pretending they care about a non-issue. They never have any actual proof of the BS they spew, but happily support draconian laws in response that cause real world deaths and consequences. Want to care about a real issue? Then start demanding financial support for single mothers.
Every born-alive infant discussed in your article was provided medical care, though none survived. Furthermore, the laws in Minnesota, as discussed in your article state:
An infant who is born alive shall be fully recognized as a human person, and accorded immediate protection under the law. All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to care for the infant who is born alive.
So, in which states is it legal to let a baby that is born alive die (without medical care)?
Until you find an example, it sounds like the moderator was correct and Trump was lying, as usual.
Question for the CEOs and other executives here - would you ever hire someone who uses the term "buthurtness" with regularity? I would have him thrown out of my office ASAP. We don't hire infants.
Well, I certainly wouldn't hire him if he couldn't even spell the word correctly.
Question for the CEOs and other executives here - would you ever hire someone who uses the term "buthurtness" with regularity? I would have him thrown out of my office ASAP. We don't hire infants.
Well, I certainly wouldn't hire him if he couldn't even spell the word correctly.
Kamala got the questions in advance. You’d have to be blind, deaf, dumb or delusional not to see that. Because Kamala performed so perfectly in every response, it was like she knew the questions for a week, and rehearsed and memorized a scripted response to each and every one of them. That’s because she did.
Her best friends run ABC. We all know what happened. She wasn’t just good last night, she was too good. Too good to be true. And when something looks too good to be true, it always is.
Kamala is as dumb as a doorknob. Perhaps the worst speaker I’ve ever seen at the highest levels of American politics. The worst in history. We’ve all watched her clueless “word salads” and stupid cackling responses for four years.
Either, she knew the questions in advance. Every one of them. And rehearsed the perfect scripted answers for 7 straight days. Or, she had a microphone in her earring and was being fed answers all night long.
#FTLH
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH It took you long enough, cry baby
News flash moron - they've ask a version of the same questions at every presidential debate in history. Who could have guessed that they were going ask about
- the economy
- healthcare
- foreign policy
- immigration
WTF did you think they were going to ask about? Golf? Hamberders? Sharks? Bacon?
Kamala got the questions in advance. You’d have to be blind, deaf, dumb or delusional not to see that. Because Kamala performed so perfectly in every response, it was like she knew the questions for a week, and rehearsed and memorized a scripted response to each and every one of them. That’s because she did.
Her best friends run ABC. We all know what happened. She wasn’t just good last night, she was too good. Too good to be true. And when something looks too good to be true, it always is.
Kamala is as dumb as a doorknob. Perhaps the worst speaker I’ve ever seen at the highest levels of American politics. The worst in history. We’ve all watched her clueless “word salads” and stupid cackling responses for four years.
Either, she knew the questions in advance. Every one of them. And rehearsed the perfect scripted answers for 7 straight days. Or, she had a microphone in her earring and was being fed answers all night long.
#FTLH
Who could have possibly foreseen that the most fervent Trumpers would be using “rigged” debate the day after Trump got obliterated?
"On May 22, 2023, the Minnesota state legislature passed an omnibus bill—signed into law the next day by Walz—that repealed all six subdivisions added by the 2015 Born Alive Infants Protection Act as well as two of the three subdivisions established in the original 1976 statute. The bill left intact the first subdivision—which read “All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken to preserve the life and health of the child”—but changed its language requiring medical personnel to “preserve the life and health of the born alive infant” to instead require medical personnel to “care for the infant who is born alive.” The bill also repealed many of Minnesota’s abortion reporting requirements, including information about born-alive infants."
There's a reason the Democrats deleted "preserve the life and health" and replaced it with "care for".
Every honest person knows what that reason is.
This is horrific.
Dem Gov. Ralph Northam, a pediatrician himself, is defending born-alive abortions:
“The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired.”pic.twitter.com/3AxXlBhImQ
Every born-alive infant discussed in your article was provided medical care, though none survived. Furthermore, the laws in Minnesota, as discussed in your article state:
So, in which states is it legal to let a baby that is born alive die (without medical care)?
Until you find an example, it sounds like the moderator was correct and Trump was lying, as usual.
Shoko mostly correct on this.
Except on the part where they changed the language to allow you to let the kid die and still technically be following the written statute...
"Care" could mean putting the kid under a blanket and putting on some soothing tunes while you wait for it to die.
"Preserving the life of" means actively trying to help the kid so that language had to go!
"On May 22, 2023, the Minnesota state legislature passed an omnibus bill—signed into law the next day by Walz—that repealed all six subdivisions added by the 2015 Born Alive Infants Protection Act as well as two of the three subdivisions established in the original 1976 statute. The bill left intact the first subdivision—which read “All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken to preserve the life and health of the child”—but changed its language requiring medical personnel to “preserve the life and health of the born alive infant” to instead require medical personnel to “care for the infant who is born alive.” The bill also repealed many of Minnesota’s abortion reporting requirements, including information about born-alive infants."
There's a reason the Democrats deleted "preserve the life and health" and replaced it with "care for".
"On May 22, 2023, the Minnesota state legislature passed an omnibus bill—signed into law the next day by Walz—that repealed all six subdivisions added by the 2015 Born Alive Infants Protection Act as well as two of the three subdivisions established in the original 1976 statute. The bill left intact the first subdivision—which read “All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken to preserve the life and health of the child”—but changed its language requiring medical personnel to “preserve the life and health of the born alive infant” to instead require medical personnel to “care for the infant who is born alive.” The bill also repealed many of Minnesota’s abortion reporting requirements, including information about born-alive infants."
There's a reason the Democrats deleted "preserve the life and health" and replaced it with "care for".
In Tim Walz's own state if a baby is born alive after a failed abortion the baby will be left to die.
No. They won't.
Here's what the law in Tim Walz's own state says:
An infant who is born alive shall be fully recognized as a human person, and accorded immediate protection under the law. All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to care for the infant who is born alive.
"On May 22, 2023, the Minnesota state legislature passed an omnibus bill—signed into law the next day by Walz—that repealed all six subdivisions added by the 2015 Born Alive Infants Protection Act as well as two of the three subdivisions established in the original 1976 statute. The bill left intact the first subdivision—which read “All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken to preserve the life and health of the child”—but changed its language requiring medical personnel to “preserve the life and health of the born alive infant” to instead require medical personnel to “care for the infant who is born alive.” The bill also repealed many of Minnesota’s abortion reporting requirements, including information about born-alive infants."
There's a reason the Democrats deleted "preserve the life and health" and replaced it with "care for".
