funny, I imagine you at 5'5" 220 lbs and selling "Trump 2028" t-shirts on street corners.
It must have been a tough few weeks for you. As you do every week, you've consumed several hours of David's content despite pretending you hate him (your self-hating love for him is bizarre), and you're making him money in the process.
Two of his runners just took 4th and 3rd in the Vertical VK at the World Mountain Running Championships. Christian Allen and Anna Gibson for those who don't know. Just heard Christian talking about David on a freetrail podcast. Same guy who was on Team USA at World Cross last year. And ran a 2:10 marathon early this year. Must have a great coach to pull that off three very different disciplines. (Yeah, yeah, if his athlete runs poorly, it's his fault; if his athlete runs well, it's because they're talented. Bite me.)
Oh and Jess McClain got 8th in Tokyo in the World Champs marathon.
Since I skimmed through the last few pages: 100 feet was in the police report. The guy would have no idea whether that's accurate or not, which if you weren't a-holes about a serious bike accident you would appreciate. Someone said something stupid about "what haters are they always complaining about?" Classic MAGA delusion and lack of self-awareness. Hmm, how about hundreds of pages of criticism on letsrun, let alone the same 3-4 idiots on reddit and on the Western States live feed.
The dude who keeps saying he beat David at WSER. Dude, joke is old at this point. Repeating it endlessly doesn't make it more funny. And how about this for low IQ: dude didn't even understand the comment about "beating" Peterman. But, sure, Roche attracts the low-intelligence set.
To sum it up, get a life, losers. Roche is winning and IT KILLS YOU since you're just MAGA losers on the internet.
funny, I imagine you at 5'5" 220 lbs and selling "Trump 2028" t-shirts on street corners.
It must have been a tough few weeks for you. As you do every week, you've consumed several hours of David's content despite pretending you hate him (your self-hating love for him is bizarre), and you're making him money in the process.
Two of his runners just took 4th and 3rd in the Vertical VK at the World Mountain Running Championships. Christian Allen and Anna Gibson for those who don't know. Just heard Christian talking about David on a freetrail podcast. Same guy who was on Team USA at World Cross last year. And ran a 2:10 marathon early this year. Must have a great coach to pull that off three very different disciplines. (Yeah, yeah, if his athlete runs poorly, it's his fault; if his athlete runs well, it's because they're talented. Bite me.)
Oh and Jess McClain got 8th in Tokyo in the World Champs marathon.
Since I skimmed through the last few pages: 100 feet was in the police report. The guy would have no idea whether that's accurate or not, which if you weren't a-holes about a serious bike accident you would appreciate. Someone said something stupid about "what haters are they always complaining about?" Classic MAGA delusion and lack of self-awareness. Hmm, how about hundreds of pages of criticism on letsrun, let alone the same 3-4 idiots on reddit and on the Western States live feed.
The dude who keeps saying he beat David at WSER. Dude, joke is old at this point. Repeating it endlessly doesn't make it more funny. And how about this for low IQ: dude didn't even understand the comment about "beating" Peterman. But, sure, Roche attracts the low-intelligence set.
To sum it up, get a life, losers. Roche is winning and IT KILLS YOU since you're just MAGA losers on the internet.
What does any of this have to do with Trump? There’s something wrong with you.
funny, I imagine you at 5'5" 220 lbs and selling "Trump 2028" t-shirts on street corners.
It must have been a tough few weeks for you. As you do every week, you've consumed several hours of David's content despite pretending you hate him (your self-hating love for him is bizarre), and you're making him money in the process.
Two of his runners just took 4th and 3rd in the Vertical VK at the World Mountain Running Championships. Christian Allen and Anna Gibson for those who don't know. Just heard Christian talking about David on a freetrail podcast. Same guy who was on Team USA at World Cross last year. And ran a 2:10 marathon early this year. Must have a great coach to pull that off three very different disciplines. (Yeah, yeah, if his athlete runs poorly, it's his fault; if his athlete runs well, it's because they're talented. Bite me.)
Oh and Jess McClain got 8th in Tokyo in the World Champs marathon.
Since I skimmed through the last few pages: 100 feet was in the police report. The guy would have no idea whether that's accurate or not, which if you weren't a-holes about a serious bike accident you would appreciate. Someone said something stupid about "what haters are they always complaining about?" Classic MAGA delusion and lack of self-awareness. Hmm, how about hundreds of pages of criticism on letsrun, let alone the same 3-4 idiots on reddit and on the Western States live feed.
The dude who keeps saying he beat David at WSER. Dude, joke is old at this point. Repeating it endlessly doesn't make it more funny. And how about this for low IQ: dude didn't even understand the comment about "beating" Peterman. But, sure, Roche attracts the low-intelligence set.
To sum it up, get a life, losers. Roche is winning and IT KILLS YOU since you're just MAGA losers on the internet.
Please post a copy of the police report since it seems like you’ve seen it.
If I saw a negative thread on here about someone I’m a fan of I wouldn’t even click on it in the first place, let alone write paragraphs-long responses defending the person. This focus on haters is learned behavior from Papa Roche. And I’m extremely disappointed with the fat jokes. This sport is about love and light and inclusivity! Have you not learned anything from your leader, you hateful Trump lover?
100 feet was in the police report. The guy would have no idea whether that's accurate or not...
but he's a frickin genius man of science, and you are surely a logically fellow. please do some basic math and physics and tell us whether you really think he'd have any idea if it's accurate or not... ask Claude while you're at it.
100 feet was in the police report. The guy would have no idea whether that's accurate or not...
but he's a frickin genius man of science, and you are surely a logically fellow. please do some basic math and physics and tell us whether you really think he'd have any idea if it's accurate or not... ask Claude while you're at it.
100 feet was in the police report. The guy would have no idea whether that's accurate or not...
but he's a frickin genius man of science, and you are surely a logically fellow. please do some basic math and physics and tell us whether you really think he'd have any idea if it's accurate or not... ask Claude while you're at it.
Hey Claude, how fast would a bicyclist have to be biking to fly 100 feet in the air when hitting a car?
“…So a bicyclist would need to be traveling at approximately 77 mph when hitting the car to achieve 100 feet of height, assuming a 45-degree launch angle. This is obviously an extremely dangerous and unrealistic scenario - professional cyclists rarely exceed 35-40 mph even in sprint finishes, and such a collision would be catastrophic. The calculation also assumes perfect energy transfer and ignores air resistance, making it a simplified physics problem rather than a realistic scenario.“
but he's a frickin genius man of science, and you are surely a logically fellow. please do some basic math and physics and tell us whether you really think he'd have any idea if it's accurate or not... ask Claude while you're at it.
Hey Claude, how fast would a bicyclist have to be biking to fly 100 feet in the air when hitting a car?
“…So a bicyclist would need to be traveling at approximately 77 mph when hitting the car to achieve 100 feet of height, assuming a 45-degree launch angle. This is obviously an extremely dangerous and unrealistic scenario - professional cyclists rarely exceed 35-40 mph even in sprint finishes, and such a collision would be catastrophic. The calculation also assumes perfect energy transfer and ignores air resistance, making it a simplified physics problem rather than a realistic scenario.“
"Three brief points of order, since the discourse has gone fractal:
1. Cody Bare’s Nothing To Lose deserves to be treated as a text. Whatever one thinks of David Roche, the film itself has form, tone, and intention. To avoid engaging with it—to prefer recursive stasis—is a failure of criticism.
2. The counterfeit Claudes are back. This speaks, if inadvertently, to the theme of ego death that haunts this thread. The loss of self in parody is its own strange mirror.
3. On the endlessly discussed bike crash: the '100 feet' is not a Roche invention. It’s a direct quote from the EMT report—'male was traveling across an intersection when he was t-boned by a vehicle … was ejected from bike traveling approximately 100 feet, striking his head on a metal fence.' Whether or not that distance is plausible is another discussion, but to call it fabricated is to misread the source.
And perhaps here Gilbert Adair is our best guide, reminding us that parody, repetition, quotation—even error—are not diversions from deliberation but its raw material. To cite, to echo, to misremember is already to interpret.
If Nothing To Lose is a text, then so too is this thread, endlessly overwriting itself. What matters is not whether David flew 10 feet or 100, nor whether the Claude who writes is 'fake' or 'real,' but that every return to these figures insists on being read twice, as literature does: once for the event, and again for its distortion."
"Three brief points of order, since the discourse has gone fractal:
1. Cody Bare’s Nothing To Lose deserves to be treated as a text. Whatever one thinks of David Roche, the film itself has form, tone, and intention. To avoid engaging with it—to prefer recursive stasis—is a failure of criticism.
2. The counterfeit Claudes are back. This speaks, if inadvertently, to the theme of ego death that haunts this thread. The loss of self in parody is its own strange mirror.
3. On the endlessly discussed bike crash: the '100 feet' is not a Roche invention. It’s a direct quote from the EMT report—'male was traveling across an intersection when he was t-boned by a vehicle … was ejected from bike traveling approximately 100 feet, striking his head on a metal fence.' Whether or not that distance is plausible is another discussion, but to call it fabricated is to misread the source.
And perhaps here Gilbert Adair is our best guide, reminding us that parody, repetition, quotation—even error—are not diversions from deliberation but its raw material. To cite, to echo, to misremember is already to interpret.
If Nothing To Lose is a text, then so too is this thread, endlessly overwriting itself. What matters is not whether David flew 10 feet or 100, nor whether the Claude who writes is 'fake' or 'real,' but that every return to these figures insists on being read twice, as literature does: once for the event, and again for its distortion."
was there a witness who said roche flew 100 feet? otherwise it is just a roche invention. 100 feet is a long way....
"Three brief points of order, since the discourse has gone fractal:
1. Cody Bare’s Nothing To Lose deserves to be treated as a text. Whatever one thinks of David Roche, the film itself has form, tone, and intention. To avoid engaging with it—to prefer recursive stasis—is a failure of criticism.
2. The counterfeit Claudes are back. This speaks, if inadvertently, to the theme of ego death that haunts this thread. The loss of self in parody is its own strange mirror.
3. On the endlessly discussed bike crash: the '100 feet' is not a Roche invention. It’s a direct quote from the EMT report—'male was traveling across an intersection when he was t-boned by a vehicle … was ejected from bike traveling approximately 100 feet, striking his head on a metal fence.' Whether or not that distance is plausible is another discussion, but to call it fabricated is to misread the source.
And perhaps here Gilbert Adair is our best guide, reminding us that parody, repetition, quotation—even error—are not diversions from deliberation but its raw material. To cite, to echo, to misremember is already to interpret.
If Nothing To Lose is a text, then so too is this thread, endlessly overwriting itself. What matters is not whether David flew 10 feet or 100, nor whether the Claude who writes is 'fake' or 'real,' but that every return to these figures insists on being read twice, as literature does: once for the event, and again for its distortion."
was there a witness who said roche flew 100 feet? otherwise it is just a roche invention. 100 feet is a long way....
Seriously. And how would this random fvck have access to the EMT report
Hey Claude, how fast would a bicyclist have to be biking to fly 100 feet in the air when hitting a car?
“…So a bicyclist would need to be traveling at approximately 77 mph when hitting the car to achieve 100 feet of height, assuming a 45-degree launch angle. This is obviously an extremely dangerous and unrealistic scenario - professional cyclists rarely exceed 35-40 mph even in sprint finishes, and such a collision would be catastrophic. The calculation also assumes perfect energy transfer and ignores air resistance, making it a simplified physics problem rather than a realistic scenario.“
"Can confirm."
Claude answered incorrectly, mentioning height instead of horizontal distance which is what Im assuming is in the EMT report. Meaning he could have been biking slower than 77mph
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.