It’s kinda sad you guys don’t even trot out anecdotes anymore. I liked sub9 claiming half his friend group was crippled by the vaccine.
Speaking of family. How’s that wacky cousin of yours doing?
Sorry. I didn’t mean to refer to him as “wacky.” That was insensitive of me. I apologize. You haven’t mentioned him since I outed him though. Don’t be embarrassed. Mental illness is nothing to be ashamed of.
Speaking of family. How’s that wacky cousin of yours doing?
Sorry. I didn’t mean to refer to him as “wacky.” That was insensitive of me. I apologize. You haven’t mentioned him since I outed him though. Don’t be embarrassed. Mental illness is nothing to be ashamed of.
We’ve achieved Jungian transcendence together. Now we blaze onward toward final individuation.
Sorry. I didn’t mean to refer to him as “wacky.” That was insensitive of me. I apologize. You haven’t mentioned him since I outed him though. Don’t be embarrassed. Mental illness is nothing to be ashamed of.
We’ve achieved Jungian transcendence together. Now we blaze onward toward final individuation.
Ah yes, ‘final individuation.’ A noble phrase if one assumes the Self is a concrete destination rather than a conceptual placeholder. But let’s not pretend that achieving ‘Jungian transcendence’ is akin to planting a flag atop the summit of the psyche. What you and cousin Vinny likely achieved is a more articulate version of ego maintenance. Jung offered a powerful metaphor for inner growth, but it’s still a map, not the territory. And frankly, the map assumes there’s a Self waiting to be discovered or integrated, which is precisely where traditions like Buddhism would raise a gentle, knowing eyebrow. OTOH, Anatta, proposes that clinging to any form of ego, even a well-integrated, archetype-approved one, is still clinging. So before we ‘blaze onward’, maybe we ask “onward to what?” Perhaps the real transcendence isn’t found in completing the hero’s journey, it’s in stepping off the path entirely. Wouldn’t you agree?
We’ve achieved Jungian transcendence together. Now we blaze onward toward final individuation.
Ah yes, ‘final individuation.’ A noble phrase if one assumes the Self is a concrete destination rather than a conceptual placeholder. But let’s not pretend that achieving ‘Jungian transcendence’ is akin to planting a flag atop the summit of the psyche. What you and cousin Vinny likely achieved is a more articulate version of ego maintenance. Jung offered a powerful metaphor for inner growth, but it’s still a map, not the territory. And frankly, the map assumes there’s a Self waiting to be discovered or integrated, which is precisely where traditions like Buddhism would raise a gentle, knowing eyebrow. OTOH, Anatta, proposes that clinging to any form of ego, even a well-integrated, archetype-approved one, is still clinging. So before we ‘blaze onward’, maybe we ask “onward to what?” Perhaps the real transcendence isn’t found in completing the hero’s journey, it’s in stepping off the path entirely. Wouldn’t you agree?
You know who needs to step off the path: Chokervic
How many more times can we describe a loss as stunning until it’s … not?
We’ve achieved Jungian transcendence together. Now we blaze onward toward final individuation.
Ah yes, ‘final individuation.’ A noble phrase if one assumes the Self is a concrete destination rather than a conceptual placeholder. But let’s not pretend that achieving ‘Jungian transcendence’ is akin to planting a flag atop the summit of the psyche. What you and cousin Vinny likely achieved is a more articulate version of ego maintenance. Jung offered a powerful metaphor for inner growth, but it’s still a map, not the territory. And frankly, the map assumes there’s a Self waiting to be discovered or integrated, which is precisely where traditions like Buddhism would raise a gentle, knowing eyebrow. OTOH, Anatta, proposes that clinging to any form of ego, even a well-integrated, archetype-approved one, is still clinging. So before we ‘blaze onward’, maybe we ask “onward to what?” Perhaps the real transcendence isn’t found in completing the hero’s journey, it’s in stepping off the path entirely. Wouldn’t you agree?
Great post. Invited more than a sophomoric, narcissistic response. Yet, here we are, stuck in some shallow version of ego maintenance. Harambe truly is the protagonist in Dostoevsky’s Notes From the Underground. Truly. Such a dark person. Utterly futile.
Ah yes, ‘final individuation.’ A noble phrase if one assumes the Self is a concrete destination rather than a conceptual placeholder. But let’s not pretend that achieving ‘Jungian transcendence’ is akin to planting a flag atop the summit of the psyche. What you and cousin Vinny likely achieved is a more articulate version of ego maintenance. Jung offered a powerful metaphor for inner growth, but it’s still a map, not the territory. And frankly, the map assumes there’s a Self waiting to be discovered or integrated, which is precisely where traditions like Buddhism would raise a gentle, knowing eyebrow. OTOH, Anatta, proposes that clinging to any form of ego, even a well-integrated, archetype-approved one, is still clinging. So before we ‘blaze onward’, maybe we ask “onward to what?” Perhaps the real transcendence isn’t found in completing the hero’s journey, it’s in stepping off the path entirely. Wouldn’t you agree?
Great post. Invited more than a sophomoric, narcissistic response. Yet, here we are, stuck in some shallow version of ego maintenance. Harambe truly is the protagonist in Dostoevsky’s Notes From the Underground. Truly. Such a dark person. Utterly futile.
There are three ongoing vaccine threads and 90% of posts have been pro vax since I joined them. The upvote downvote ratios are clear: I’ve driven the antivaxxers before me. Now I will hear the lamentations of people who think a blog or a $1500/hr video call is a valid source.
Fellas, is predicting something a month after it happens the same as predicting something almost a year before it happens?
Well, seeing as how neither of these things occurred, I’m not sure why you’re pounding the table on this.
For those playing at home, contrary to what Harambe said, Novak did not have a slide in late 2023. He won the ATP Masters in mid-November and then focused on his big Olympic year in 2024. It is true that he got a flu during the Australian Open in January 2024 and bowed out in the semifinal to a convicted doper in Jannik Sinner. Harambe immediately pounced and proudly proclaimed Djokovic had “long Covid” right after that happened.
Djokovic, ever focused on Olympic gold, the crowning achievement for his career, pulled out of the Paris Open. He did, however, make the Wimbledon final and win the Olympic gold medal. Neither one of those things would’ve been possible if a person was truly suffering long Covid. It’s as if we are sitting here pretending Djokovic made every grand slam final he ever played in and, even more ridiculously, won them all. When none of that ever happened.
I previously proclaimed that Djokovic would retire by 38 at the latest. Pro tennis players are usually done at 35. If Djokovic retires this year or next, am I going to come on here and proudly proclaim what a genius I am? Of course not. I don’t know why liberals on here like Harambe carry on with the schadenfreude. It, along with a partisan and ethically bankrupt media, undermined public health and trust in the three-letter agencies. It also lost them an election. But they continue to double down. Boggles the mind.
I’ve been wondering why Harambe has shown this weird obsession with Novak Djokovic. Then I remembered the post quoted above. Sub9 put Harambe in the corner and stole his manhood some months ago and Harambe has been on a rampage ever since trying to even the score. Bless his little heart.
Well, seeing as how neither of these things occurred, I’m not sure why you’re pounding the table on this.
For those playing at home, contrary to what Harambe said, Novak did not have a slide in late 2023. He won the ATP Masters in mid-November and then focused on his big Olympic year in 2024. It is true that he got a flu during the Australian Open in January 2024 and bowed out in the semifinal to a convicted doper in Jannik Sinner. Harambe immediately pounced and proudly proclaimed Djokovic had “long Covid” right after that happened.
Djokovic, ever focused on Olympic gold, the crowning achievement for his career, pulled out of the Paris Open. He did, however, make the Wimbledon final and win the Olympic gold medal. Neither one of those things would’ve been possible if a person was truly suffering long Covid. It’s as if we are sitting here pretending Djokovic made every grand slam final he ever played in and, even more ridiculously, won them all. When none of that ever happened.
I previously proclaimed that Djokovic would retire by 38 at the latest. Pro tennis players are usually done at 35. If Djokovic retires this year or next, am I going to come on here and proudly proclaim what a genius I am? Of course not. I don’t know why liberals on here like Harambe carry on with the schadenfreude. It, along with a partisan and ethically bankrupt media, undermined public health and trust in the three-letter agencies. It also lost them an election. But they continue to double down. Boggles the mind.
I’ve been wondering why Harambe has shown this weird obsession with Novak Djokovic. Then I remembered the post quoted above. Sub9 put Harambe in the corner and stole his manhood some months ago and Harambe has been on a rampage ever since trying to even the score. Bless his little heart.
Chokervic has since lost to a teenager and two people outside the top 40
