As I said, I don’t watch him and intent wasn’t to promote him, but share what the title of the video said. I’m not flustered either at having inadvertently promoted a far left channel.
I don’t describe my personal perspective as pro-life. I’ve consistently in previous posts said I don’t have a personal investment in sanctity of life arguments rooted in religion. My perspectives have strictly been based on two principles: 1) equal rights for sexes; 2) democracy. All the legal analysis of scotus opinions and the constitution is intellectual masturbation (though conscientious nevertheless).
So you’re just in here stroking yourself with no opinion on Roe then, got it.
The dude refuses to state his/her actual positions because they know they are so embarrassingly backward and indefensible.
As I said, I don’t watch him and intent wasn’t to promote him, but share what the title of the video said. I’m not flustered either at having inadvertently promoted a far left channel.
I don’t describe my personal perspective as pro-life. I’ve consistently in previous posts said I don’t have a personal investment in sanctity of life arguments rooted in religion. My perspectives have strictly been based on two principles: 1) equal rights for sexes; 2) democracy. All the legal analysis of scotus opinions and the constitution is intellectual masturbation (though conscientious nevertheless).
So you’re just in here stroking yourself with no opinion on Roe then, got it.
You seem reading comprehension challenged. I’ve plentifully stated my stance on Roe in many pages, but it can be hard for the lazy or reading-challenged to follow.
I have nothing against masturbation. You sound like a prude that does.
So you’re just in here stroking yourself with no opinion on Roe then, got it.
You seem reading comprehension challenged. I’ve plentifully stated my stance on Roe in many pages, but it can be hard for the lazy or reading-challenged to follow.
I have nothing against masturbation. You sound like a prude that does.
Oh and MR fan, sorry I got some of my jizz on your face.
So you’re just in here stroking yourself with no opinion on Roe then, got it.
The dude refuses to state his/her actual positions because they know they are so embarrassingly backward and indefensible.
Keep yelling like the stupid monkey you are. Your claims are the most blatantly false ones on this thread. When you acquire reading comprehension skills, come back and try harder.
The dude refuses to state his/her actual positions because they know they are so embarrassingly backward and indefensible.
Keep yelling like the stupid monkey you are. Your claims are the most blatantly false ones on this thread. When you acquire reading comprehension skills, come back and try harder.
You've been asked countless times to 'put up or shut up' and state your personal beliefs on abortion rather than just faffing about. Still waiting!
You seem reading comprehension challenged. I’ve plentifully stated my stance on Roe in many pages, but it can be hard for the lazy or reading-challenged to follow.
I have nothing against masturbation. You sound like a prude that does.
Oh and MR fan, sorry I got some of my jizz on your face.
0/10 troll attempt. I’ve glossed over your posts and you really don’t have anything to say. Just out here promoting my boy Sam Seder. LEFT IS BEST 🤘
Keep yelling like the stupid monkey you are. Your claims are the most blatantly false ones on this thread. When you acquire reading comprehension skills, come back and try harder.
You've been asked countless times to 'put up or shut up' and state your personal beliefs on abortion rather than just faffing about. Still waiting!
I’ve stated it countless times, but your monkey brain is too stupid to read. What can I do? The only tactic you seem to have left is to keep saying I haven’t stated my position, a lie like many of your others.
Others have had no problem understanding my position and acknowledging it as logically consistent.
You've been asked countless times to 'put up or shut up' and state your personal beliefs on abortion rather than just faffing about. Still waiting!
I’ve stated it countless times, but your monkey brain is too stupid to read. What can I do? The only tactic you seem to have left is to keep saying I haven’t stated my position, a lie like many of your others.
Others have had no problem understanding my position and acknowledging it as logically consistent.
0/10 troll attempt. I’ve glossed over your posts and you really don’t have anything to say. Just out here promoting my boy Sam Seder. LEFT IS BEST 🤘
Tell your Seder to lick off the jizz I left on your far left face.
Glossing over is what illiterate reading challenged folks do.
He’s your Seder too since you promoted his content. Apparently you’re too lazy to actually listen and comprehend what those lefties have to offer. You thought you had one with the title until I called you out on promoting a position you don’t even believe in ahhhahahahahahaha!
No sweetheart, just jizzing on your face. Thought you enjoyed it, no?
I’ll take some jizz on my face since I’m not a homophobe. Sometimes you get caught in the cross fire. See how easy this is: I support roe v Wade. Now your turn.
These types of philosophical questions don’t provide practical answers.
Does anyone here think it okay to cut off a baby’s head instead of the umbilical cord even as it is trying to come out? That’s what I thought.
Now you are just squabbling about a cutoff (see what I did there) date. Who decides that date? Each individual woman in isolation? Sorry, that makes no sense from any moral, medical, or political principle. The people as a whole decide that. That’s how a democracy works. What happened last week is just that: scotus returning the buck to democratic legislation.
The only morally and intellectually honest opposition to the above can be from someone who sincerely believes in the sanctity of life and therefore can accept no cutoff date after fertilization no matter what the people of the state want. Yet, the shrillest complainers on this thread are the Roe apologists.
The question about saving a 5 year old girl or 100 embryos at a burning clinic is a very good one. Everyone chooses the 5 year old girl which makes it clear there is a difference in rights between the two even for abortion absolutists. Thus, abortion absolutism = completely intellectually and morally inconsistent. Game over.
You don’t even understand the scenario you are commenting on.
picking between the two options doesn’t mean one has more rights than the other. It is based on the value assigned to the two options by the person choosing.
Tell your Seder to lick off the jizz I left on your far left face.
Glossing over is what illiterate reading challenged folks do.
He’s your Seder too since you promoted his content. Apparently you’re too lazy to actually listen and comprehend what those lefties have to offer. You thought you had one with the title until I called you out on promoting a position you don’t even believe in ahhhahahahahahaha!
Oh jizzface, you seem hurt. You didn’t call me out on anything. I already clarified it doesn’t bother me at all the speaker is leftist. I don’t care about the speaker, only the content. Except when it’s jizzfaces who can only spout useless nonsense.
He’s your Seder too since you promoted his content. Apparently you’re too lazy to actually listen and comprehend what those lefties have to offer. You thought you had one with the title until I called you out on promoting a position you don’t even believe in ahhhahahahahahaha!
Oh jizzface, you seem hurt. You didn’t call me out on anything. I already clarified it doesn’t bother me at all the speaker is leftist. I don’t care about the speaker, only the content. Except when it’s jizzfaces who can only spout useless nonsense.
The question about saving a 5 year old girl or 100 embryos at a burning clinic is a very good one. Everyone chooses the 5 year old girl which makes it clear there is a difference in rights between the two even for abortion absolutists. Thus, abortion absolutism = completely intellectually and morally inconsistent. Game over.
You don’t even understand the scenario you are commenting on.
picking between the two options doesn’t mean one has more rights than the other. It is based on the value assigned to the two options by the person choosing.
Everyone agrees there is more value in a 5 year old than 100 embryos. This hurts the abortion lunatics' arguments. lol