Flagpole wrote:
Night observer wrote:
It is very possible that trump didn't legally collude with the Russians but that they significantly helped him to win anyway.
How does that fit in your assessment as to whether you were right or wrong.
It has already been proven that Russia helped Trump win by posting tons of ads on social media to prop Trump up and tear Hillary down, mostly fake information in both cases. BUT, if they did that with no collusion with the Trump organization, then I still say I was wrong. IF though, they colluded with the Trump campaign, then that is cheating and I will be proven right.
Time will tell.
While I am certain that collusion will be proven (I say it has already, but it will be even more clear eventually), I don't need that to be proven. I believe it is dangerous to continue to have him in office for a variety of reasons, so whatever it is (as long as legal) that gets him removed from office as soon as possible, I am all for it.
I believe that right now Mueller has enough to indict Trump himself. He is now using Manafort to get more dirt on Trump, and he is using Flynn also. The ONLY reason to do this is to really punish Donald Trump. When it finally hits the fan with Trump, it will be very serious. Removal from office is going to happen, and he will be lucky to not go to jail.
Hey douchebag- no one cares what you believe.
Not just because of how big of said douchebag you have proven yourself to be over the past couple years (at least), but because if the “Russia!” investigation charade only produces indictments from known activity pre-2015, then it’s clear this is all the establishment butthurt reaction to being rejected.
But keep those fingers crossed hard!! You little baby, you.