Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

The Gallant Pig Man wrote:

Wikileaks was working on behalf of Trump and Russia and supplied the administration with information that it then immediately used for political gain. Everybody in the administration knew because Junior told them about it. Wikileaks specifically asked Trump to reject the election results if he lost. (In other words, their goal was to undermine our "democracy" should it have produced an outcome they didn't like.) They (probably Assange himself) also asked that Trump recommend Assange for an ambassadorship in Australia.

Fvck you, Glenn Greenwald.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/11/the-secret-correspondence-between-donald-trump-jr-and-wikileaks/545738/

..........but what ended up happening, was Hillary and the DNC rejecting the election results. When Hillary didn't concede that night, I won $100 from 3 of my Liberal pals.

None of this really matters to anyone that isn't butthurt about the election result. ANY method of exposing MORE truth is better than being lied to and manipulated. That's what the MSM STILL- incredibly- doesn't understand. We don't care about how the bad news was exposed; we're happy it was exposed. If it wasn't exposed, we were voting for a POS.

And let's not forget, we probably wouldn't even be having this discussion if Hillary and the DNC had a damn message besides "hate white men."

That is absolutely hilarious by the way!! HAHA!! What a marooooon!!

L L wrote:

Moore is actually raising more money and getting stronger support because of these allegations.

And by stronger support, I mean those that supported him before and more entrenched, but they still only get one vote each.

I don't think many will switch their vote from Moore to Jones but I do think a number of people who initially supported him will simply not vote.

On the other side, Democrat Alabamans who have been disenfranchised over the years and wouldn't normally waste their time coming out to vote now have a reason to vote and they they can win.

That is how you can get a Democrat from Alabama in the senate.

Alabama is not as Republican as people think.

Their other senator, Richard Shelby, was originally elected and re-elected senator as a Democrat and then switched to the Republican party in 1994.

Yeah, Alabama is gradually becoming more Democratic and I think it's more about the message that Jones sends during the campaign. If he tries the Northram-esque "link my opponent to Trump and his policies" that will not be as successful as a message that sticks to "I'm going to do what I can to take care of the people of Alabama".

Real life hurts wrote:

EPlC Flagpole wrote:

Your "no betting" stance is probably the smartest thing you've displayed here on LRC. You'd be losing your shirt on a monthly basis. Here's a couple gems from Flagpole back in mid 2016... before the most EPIC Flagpole of all time...

That is absolutely hilarious by the way!! HAHA!! What a marooooon!!

That's how "Flagpole" went from a noun to a verb.

Rand Paul appears to be letting his desire to force thousands of Americans into an early grave get the better of him and is now doing his darnedest to sink the tax bill. Go, Senator Leaf-Blower, go!

https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/930471538985455616

Rand Paul is one of the most useless senators ever.

None of major ideas ever get implemented and he votes no on almost everything.

Or maybe I can say he was useful in voting no on one of the Obamacare replace plans.

He thought the replacement still helped too many people and so Obamacare, which helps even more people, stay on the books.

So now he'll sink the tax cut bill because he wants more tax cuts.

He hates debt unless the debt is increased by more tax breaks for the wealthy.

hard to watch the decline wrote:

DFF

When I talked about the decline in values. I certainly wasn't referring to you.

You have been a constant articulate voice of reason on this message board. You present the trump values with remarkable clarity.

God bless you and all you do!

(I wish ALL of our posters were just like you)

✔️

You are “TRIGGERED❗️“ Got it???

This whole politics climate is a $hit show. Republicans should be deeply disappointed because there has been neither the disruption they hoped for with Trump or any effective governance or collaboration within the party. Meanwhile Democrats still refuse to take the high road regarding Trump and aren’t being creative or constructive in their approach. The end result will be continue and increasing anger toward politicians and if not an easy re election for Trump then possibly the election of a much worse Republican candidate.

Trollminator wrote:Meanwhile Democrats still refuse to take the high road

The only people taking the "high road" are the losers, guided by the winners who force the loser onto the "high road."

Meanwhile, Hatch's revised legislation would make individual tax cuts temporary, business cuts permanent.

Conservatives catering to their sugar daddy's, not their voters.

What I find most interesting about this is that despite the fact "trickle down" economics is a total failure, the voters seem to support their own party crushing the middle class, repeatedly, at this point for more than 20 years.

I am not sure what you mean by Democrats refusing to take the high road regarding Trump.

First of all, all roads are higher than Trump. (yes I see the irony of me making a low blow there)

But politicians have two jobs. Get elected and govern.

Democrats do govern well. They tend to implement things where Republicans have not implemented anything.

The Democrats didn't do a good job of getting elected last year.

There were few elections this year but Democrats did well in the ones that were up for grabs.

And they may get a Democrat elected for an Alabama seat, though that will be more of a Republican failure than a Democrat strategy.

We will have to see what next year's elections bring.

But when in power, Democrats are much better at governing.

But the climate is all Trump's doing.

He is clearly divisive and will attack Americans that aren't on his side.

Democrats aren't doing a good job. They currently lack a centralized message and are losing identity. They are old and washed and still haven't addressed the concerns of the millions who obviously were distraught enough to vote for the buffoon (whether their worries are real or not is besides the point). If what I just pointed out wasn't true then approval ratings would be increasing for Democrats and not decreasing. They are failing to motivate voters and instead are going to rely on the Trump factor to get people out there. I don't think this is the best strategy. They still need to address their leadership issues. There is a vacuum right now.

When I say high road, I mean they don't need to point the finger at the obvious. Blaming Trump and publicly smearing his disastrous administration is cheap and isn't going to help them win votes. Watch any local election ad and you'll see dems trying to make some direct connection between their Republican opponent and Trump. You say that Democrats are better at governing when in power and I agree with you, but enough of the voting base obviously didn't. I think we are making a huge mistake thinking this will all sort itself out because Trump is such a disaster.

This is COMEDY GOLD:) I especially like the bit "demoRats being better a governing..LOL

Hilarious, keep the laughs coming libbbtwats!!!

There is no possible good reason for this. They are just pathetic and proud of it. Anyone who wants to go to Africa to kill elephants is a sick fvck.

Under Obama, Marine Sargent Andrew Tahmooressi spent 214 days in Mexican prison and Otto Warmbier rotted in a North Korea prison camp. Under Trump, the (black) UCLA basketball players spent a mere 7 days under Chinese house arrest. And the libs call Trump racist?

This is the stupidest post on Letsrun in a long time (not counting of course posts from deranged people)

Legit question wrote:

Under Obama, Marine Sargent Andrew Tahmooressi spent 214 days in Mexican prison and Otto Warmbier rotted in a North Korea prison camp. Under Trump, the (black) UCLA basketball players spent a mere 7 days under Chinese house arrest. And the libs call Trump racist?

You are saying President Trump should have let these Black UCLA students spend a decade in a Chinese Prison for shop lifting. You fckn RACIST? Libbbtwats?‍♂️

call you out!! wrote:

This is the stupidest post on Letsrun in a long time (not counting of course posts from deranged people)

Legit question wrote:

Under Obama, Marine Sargent Andrew Tahmooressi spent 214 days in Mexican prison and Otto Warmbier rotted in a North Korea prison camp. Under Trump, the (black) UCLA basketball players spent a mere 7 days under Chinese house arrest. And the libs call Trump racist?

call you out!! wrote:

This is the stupidest post on Letsrun in a long time (not counting of course posts from deranged people)

Legit question wrote:

Under Obama, Marine Sargent Andrew Tahmooressi spent 214 days in Mexican prison and Otto Warmbier rotted in a North Korea prison camp. Under Trump, the (black) UCLA basketball players spent a mere 7 days under Chinese house arrest. And the libs call Trump racist?

I assume it's a troll, but I'm genuinely baffled. Is the measure of a good president their ability to protect Americans when they commit crimes abroad? Like, I don't agree with the (potential) sentence in all three of these cases, but I also don't have an expectation that Daddy President is going to swoop in and save someone from a situation that they themselves caused.

Count Chocula wrote:

call you out!! wrote:

This is the stupidest post on Letsrun in a long time (not counting of course posts from deranged people)

I assume it's a troll, but I'm genuinely baffled. Is the measure of a good president their ability to protect Americans when they commit crimes abroad? Like, I don't agree with the (potential) sentence in all three of these cases, but I also don't have an expectation that Daddy President is going to swoop in and save someone from a situation that they themselves caused.

It was DFF of course, and sadly he wasn't trolling.

Count Chocula wrote:

I also don't have an expectation that Daddy President is going to swoop in and save someone from a situation that they themselves caused.

It's a typical fascist display of power, just like ending the ban on elephant trophies.

"Daddy President" is an elegant way to describe his attempt to create a fascist State via his obsession with celebrity.

The Dear Leader protects us!