Correct, but it contributes to the larger spectrum of factors to raise the energy efficiency.🧙♂️
No it absolutely does not. Showing more signs of ignorance that make people doubt you as being a coach
VO2max is the size of your engine, your ceiling. Efficiency is the actual amount of O2 you require (ml/kg/km). The VO2max is more of an inherent parameter whereas efficiency can be improved. A runner with a cost of 50ml/kg/km at VO2max of 75 is better than one with a cost of 60 at VO2max of 80 by 12.5%
I have now commented this with shorter so called maxVO2 intervals and their main purpose , and if you think you know more about it than one of the world's leading physiologists I let you believe that... 😁🧙♂️ Have a nice day. 🖐
Hehe! Amusing!😂It will be atleast one actual race on track or road in August to October. In beginning of October I'm looking forward to run in Sandnes ,Norway , in the Ingebrigtsen RunFest 5 k totally flat road race .And I'm also interested in running two international Masters 5000m track races in Lithuania and Latvia . We will see what happens . 🧙♂️🇸🇪
We know what will happen. What always happens. Nothing.
I will be in Trollhätan in December. I bet a meal at Hamnmagasinet (starters, pizza, drinks and dessert) that you won't run (must finish the race) any of those races.
Now, man up and take the bet. I will enjoy my free meal while you eat some juicy crow.
A fair bet I think I could accept, but if the bet includes I must eat in your company I refrain, LoL )) Well, sounds very easy for me to win the bet if the only requirement is I run the race and finish? 😁🧙♂️
Well, on reflection I can change my mind about bet conditions and my free meal.))
Could be a good opportunity for you to see, and me to show you, all the evidences of my national elite running career and my many successful coaching cases.... 🤔🧙♂️
That is certainly not a conventional interpretation but if one wants to reach, I suppose. At that point though energy efficiency becomes completely meaningless.
I’m going to ask you again what that workout (20x45) is trying to do, and if you’re saying it’s working on more than one thing, that is fine, but you should list it in order of priority and none of the items should be major contributors to any of the other items. In short, I don’t think energy efficiency is a reasonable thing for you to say because it is so large and nebulous, at least the way you tend to use it. It’s like saying I’m doing this workout because I think it will make me faster. Of course that is the goal, but it doesn’t reflect any sort of insight.
Well, I will laborate little more about this with shorter so called maxVO2 intervals( And they aren't " gloryfied strides"😁) .As I've told before I have some years ago discussed this subject with one of the world's most experienced physiologists mr Leif-Inge Tjelta of Norway ( most known as advicer of the Ingebrigtsen brothers). He told me he agree with me how one should look up on the main purpose with them and what they mainly give as a result. According to him( and I agree). the main purpose with them is to get the body used to the pace with many shorter reps and the biomechanics at the pace will be improved and lead to more efficient energy consumption at the pace. So, the main purpose with them isn't to stay for long at high % of maxVO2 in every rep but instead do many shorter reps of them and the total volume of reps high at the pace . Is 3 k pace better than 5 k pace? Well, according to Daniels the difference in what they give as result it's negligible, so he adviced to use 5 k pace when it is enough effort to reach the desired outcome in results and as an extra benefit reduces injury and overdoing risks . 🧙♂️
Just to be clear, after a ton of back-and-forth about whether this was for anything other than biomechanics you have now stated that this is entirely about biomechanics. Like when you say better biomechanics and more efficient energy consumption, that more efficient energy consumption is because of the biomechanics. So now the question is should a person who is only going to do two or three quality sessions a week to devote one of them entirely to biomechanics, with no other defined benefit, when training for a 5K.
I don’t find someone’s recollection of a conversation with a person of respec terribly convincing, especially on a message board
Hehe! Amusing!😂It will be atleast one actual race on track or road in August to October. In beginning of October I'm looking forward to run in Sandnes ,Norway , in the Ingebrigtsen RunFest 5 k totally flat road race .And I'm also interested in running two international Masters 5000m track races in Lithuania and Latvia . We will see what happens . 🧙♂️🇸🇪
What kind of times do they need to qualify for the Master’s races in Latvia and Lithuania? I’m upper 40’s and would love to see if I could get sub 17 or faster in a track 5k.
Well,sorry, I don't know yet, but I can contact the organizers and ask .Just a guess there aren't any time limit restrictions when I think they are happy to get runners? Well, would be no problem to ask them yourself? 🖐🧙♂️
Well, I will laborate little more about this with shorter so called maxVO2 intervals( And they aren't " gloryfied strides"😁) .As I've told before I have some years ago discussed this subject with one of the world's most experienced physiologists mr Leif-Inge Tjelta of Norway ( most known as advicer of the Ingebrigtsen brothers). He told me he agree with me how one should look up on the main purpose with them and what they mainly give as a result. According to him( and I agree). the main purpose with them is to get the body used to the pace with many shorter reps and the biomechanics at the pace will be improved and lead to more efficient energy consumption at the pace. So, the main purpose with them isn't to stay for long at high % of maxVO2 in every rep but instead do many shorter reps of them and the total volume of reps high at the pace . Is 3 k pace better than 5 k pace? Well, according to Daniels the difference in what they give as result it's negligible, so he adviced to use 5 k pace when it is enough effort to reach the desired outcome in results and as an extra benefit reduces injury and overdoing risks . 🧙♂️
Just to be clear, after a ton of back-and-forth about whether this was for anything other than biomechanics you have now stated that this is entirely about biomechanics. Like when you say better biomechanics and more efficient energy consumption, that more efficient energy consumption is because of the biomechanics. So now the question is should a person who is only going to do two or three quality sessions a week to devote one of them entirely to biomechanics, with no other defined benefit, when training for a 5K.
I don’t find someone’s recollection of a conversation with a person of respec terribly convincing, especially on a message board
Well, if you ' interpret' what I wrote in this way in this your comment it looks to me you didn't understand what I wrote.I never wrote doing so called maxVO2 shorter reps only purpose is to improve biomechanics. 🧙♂️