Trump is a treasonous ass hole. Never has there been a president that has hated the country as much as he does.
-
104
-
Orange is the new blimpo wrote:
Trump is a treasonous ass hole. Never has there been a president that has hated the country as much as he does.
Treasonous criminal arz-whole. No kings. Locking up time is near. Keep the popcorn handy.
61 -
I've been holding my breath for 5 months now. Any proof yet that Trump planned the 1/6 riots? Starting to get a little low on breath here.
22 -
The Treasonous A hole also has just proclaimed the US Constitution should be terminated. And he still supported by his mouth breathers. There is no line that he can cross that will stop the cult from adoration.
63 -
Soon there will be Jan 6 hearings in the other direction.
Why did police led unarmed protestors into a government building and then open fire on them?
Why and to what extent did FBI infiltrators lead them into it?etc etc
58 -
Fox news Freddie.... wrote:
The Treasonous A hole also has just proclaimed the US Constitution should be terminated. And he still supported by his mouth breathers. There is no line that he can cross that will stop the cult from adoration.
Stop pretending you give the slightest f*ck about the constitution.
As for the scary orange man who dominates every inch of your tiny mind he's losing to DeSantis in every single poll.
23 -
The House select committee investigating the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol has decided to make criminal referrals to the Department of Justice, the panel’s chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson, told reporters Tuesday.20
-
Fox news Freddie.... wrote:
The Treasonous A hole also has just proclaimed the US Constitution should be terminated. And he still supported by his mouth breathers. There is no line that he can cross that will stop the cult from adoration.
No he didn't.
Read his tweet.
Deep State lie
15 -
Bad Wigins wrote:
Soon there will be Jan 6 hearings in the other direction.
Why did police led unarmed protestors into a government building and then open fire on them?
Why and to what extent did FBI infiltrators lead them into it?
etc etc
Why no arrest for the shooting of an unarmed protester?
34 -
carmine9 wrote:
Fox news Freddie.... wrote:
The Treasonous A hole also has just proclaimed the US Constitution should be terminated. And he still supported by his mouth breathers. There is no line that he can cross that will stop the cult from adoration.
No he didn't.
Read his tweet.
Deep State lie
His quote was to terminate rules, even under the Constitution. Explicitly calling for relevant rules under the constitution to be terminated is a termination, is it not?
60 -
carmine9 wrote:
Bad Wigins wrote:
Soon there will be Jan 6 hearings in the other direction.
Why did police led unarmed protestors into a government building and then open fire on them?
Why and to what extent did FBI infiltrators lead them into it?
etc etc
Why no arrest for the shooting of an unarmed protester?
Because she was part of a group breaking into a barricaded room, giving reason for those charged with protecting the room cause to resist those breaking in. At the time she was shot, she was trying to enter the room via a window that the group she was with broke.
81 -
SeattleSilver wrote:
Because she was part of a group breaking into a barricaded room, giving reason for those charged with protecting the room cause to resist those breaking in.
If cops had shot 2020 rioters for this exact same behavior you'd be condeming them.
Portland cops were besieged in their stations who knows how many times06 -
Bad Wigins wrote:
SeattleSilver wrote:
Because she was part of a group breaking into a barricaded room, giving reason for those charged with protecting the room cause to resist those breaking in.
If cops had shot 2020 rioters for this exact same behavior you'd be condeming them.
Portland cops were besieged in their stations who knows how many times
Probably 2600 times.
70 -
Bad Wigins wrote:
SeattleSilver wrote:
Because she was part of a group breaking into a barricaded room, giving reason for those charged with protecting the room cause to resist those breaking in.
If cops had shot 2020 rioters for this exact same behavior you'd be condeming them.
Portland cops were besieged in their stations who knows how many times
So are you FOR or AGAINST cops shooting rioters for the this exact behavior?
Hard to tell from your posts which it is. You seem to be on the fence, depending on day.
01 -
SeattleSilver wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
Why no arrest for the shooting of an unarmed protester?
Because she was part of a group breaking into a barricaded room, giving reason for those charged with protecting the room cause to resist those breaking in. At the time she was shot, she was trying to enter the room via a window that the group she was with broke.
1. She was unarmed.
2. The people in the room had a path of retreat.
If a private citizen murdered an unarmed person in the exact same circumstance in DC it would be felony murder.
24 -
Bad Wigins wrote:
SeattleSilver wrote:
Because she was part of a group breaking into a barricaded room, giving reason for those charged with protecting the room cause to resist those breaking in.
If cops had shot 2020 rioters for this exact same behavior you'd be condeming them.
Portland cops were besieged in their stations who knows how many times
I would? Prove it.
I didn't approve of general shooting or rioters, but that isn't what happened on January 6. The one person shot was trying to enter a barricaded room housing members of Congress. The shooting was justifiable to defend the members of Congress. It would have been absurd and careless to assume that people breaking into the barricaded room meant no harm.
40 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
SeattleSilver wrote:
Because she was part of a group breaking into a barricaded room, giving reason for those charged with protecting the room cause to resist those breaking in. At the time she was shot, she was trying to enter the room via a window that the group she was with broke.
1. She was unarmed.
2. The people in the room had a path of retreat.
If a private citizen murdered an unarmed person in the exact same circumstance in DC it would be felony murder.
You liberals will never understand the difficult and immediate decisions that cops have make when deciding whether to use deadly force. There was a large riot going on in the Capitol building, the cop had no ability to determine whether the nutjob trying to break into Speaker's Lobby was armed or not. Certainly she was part of a mob that yelling threats at members of Congress and the cops, and she was trying to illegally break into secured room. The cop's duty was to protect members of Congress that were being threatened. He had no choice. But you defund the cop types are such disgusting people that you will never understand.
33 -
Rockall UK wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
1. She was unarmed.
2. The people in the room had a path of retreat.
If a private citizen murdered an unarmed person in the exact same circumstance in DC it would be felony murder.
You liberals will never understand the difficult and immediate decisions that cops have make when deciding whether to use deadly force. There was a large riot going on in the Capitol building, the cop had no ability to determine whether the nutjob trying to break into Speaker's Lobby was armed or not. Certainly she was part of a mob that yelling threats at members of Congress and the cops, and she was trying to illegally break into secured room. The cop's duty was to protect members of Congress that were being threatened. He had no choice. But you defund the cop types are such disgusting people that you will never understand.
Oh please.
People bend over backwards when cops kill unarmed civilians
03 -
You liberals will never understand the difficult and immediate decisions that cops have make when deciding whether to use deadly force. There was a large riot going on in the Capitol building, the cop had no ability to determine whether the nutjob trying to break into Speaker's Lobby was armed or not. Certainly she was part of a mob that yelling threats at members of Congress and the cops, and she was trying to illegally break into secured room. The cop's duty was to protect members of Congress that were being threatened. He had no choice. But you defund the cop types are such disgusting people that you will never understand.
You know what I understand? Today at the ceremony to honor those officers with the Medal of Honor, they and their families shook Pelosi and Schumer’s hands but they refused to shake hands with the Republican leaders. Take that, “blue line” hypocrites.
11 -
Rockall UK wrote:
Bad Wigins wrote:
If cops had shot 2020 rioters for this exact same behavior you'd be condeming them.
Portland cops were besieged in their stations who knows how many times
So are you FOR or AGAINST cops shooting rioters for the this exact behavior?
Hard to tell from your posts which it is. You seem to be on the fence, depending on day.
what difference would that make, when pointing out the hypocrisy of the "left" here? It is what it is. Never in history have they generally sided against protestors, unless it's the other side's protestors.
It's worth adding that the "BLM" (which were really more Antifa) riots in 2020 were not all unarmed people, and they were directly attacking the cops or otherwise provoking them, and still the cops mainly held their fire, even with fireworks going off around them, which sound like gunfire.00
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.