OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
Well given that the alternative was HRC, the most corrupt, incompetent and overall despicable candidate in the history of the good ol USA, you're right.
Ccorrupt, incompetent and overall despicable perfectly defines Trump.
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
Well given that the alternative was HRC, the most corrupt, incompetent and overall despicable candidate in the history of the good ol USA, you're right.
Ccorrupt, incompetent and overall despicable perfectly defines Trump.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2016/03/21/meet-the-men-shaping-donald-trumps-foreign-policy-views/?utm_term=.e61e822f20b2here you go wrote:
eric a blair wrote:
yes, your campaign chair was a massive criminal.
And why don't you discuss papadopoulis? a campaign advisor who lies to the FBI!
I'm seeing a pattern here - do you?
Hint: criminals and people who lie about meeting with russians.
I'm seeing a pattern... You're a serious case of fu@king idiot.
Manafort is FAR closer with long dealings along side the Podesta's.
Papadopoulos was volunteer who sat in on one meeting. He was not an "advisor".
GFY
I'm not saying that he necessarily played a large role in the campaign, but Trump himself called Papadopoulos an advisor. So you can understand why he is receiving some scrutiny.
The only pattern I see is that CNN and company have gone bananas inciting people with hate and half truths. I'm not defending any criminals. You are twisting facts as usual. Manaford has been working with Podesta, who is linked to the Clinton Foundation. You ignore this fact for some reason. The libs have been clinging to Papadopoulos as the guy who was wearing a wire and was going to entrap the entire administration. I have some news for you. STOP WATCHING CNN. "But Mr. Papadopoulos’s cooperation with the federal government is unlikely to have included wearing a wire or otherwise surreptitiously recording anyone in Mr. Trump’s orbit, according to court documents and analyses by legal experts. That is because the conditions that were set on Mr. Papadopoulos following his arrest in July prevented him from contacting people associated with the Trump campaign, and those conditions appeared to remain in place through at least early October. Mr. Papadopoulos was “directed not to have any contact, direct or indirect, with individuals related to the campaign or to any of the conduct set forth in the complaint,” prosecutor Andrew Goldstein told Judge Randolph Moss at Mr. Papadopoulos’s plea agreement hearing in early October, according to a transcript."https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-big-question-in-washington-how-has-papadopoulos-aided-investigators-1509528631
eric a blair wrote:
yes, your campaign chair was a massive criminal.
And why don't you discuss papadopoulis? a campaign advisor who lies to the FBI!
I'm seeing a pattern here - do you?
Hint: criminals and people who lie about meeting with russians.
its_baddude wrote:
Yes, the campaign chair for 3 months before he was fired. It appears like the FBI failed to inform the Trump campaign he was under investigation. So what. He laundered money when he was working for Podesta. Why don't you mention that?
The crazy left wingers put this add in the Virginia Governor's race. An imaginary white guy in a truck with a confederate flag running over latinos and muslim kids. They think this is OK. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/10/30/latino_victory_fund_ad_depicts_ed_gillespie_supporter_terrorizing_minority_children.html In reality, this is what happened a few days later.http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/31/us/new-york-shots-fired/index.html
its_baddude wrote:
The only pattern I see is that CNN and company have gone bananas inciting people with hate and half truths.
I'm not defending any criminals. You are twisting facts as usual. Manaford has been working with Podesta, who is linked to the Clinton Foundation. You ignore this fact for some reason.
The libs have been clinging to Papadopoulos as the guy who was wearing a wire and was going to entrap the entire administration. I have some news for you. STOP WATCHING CNN.
"But Mr. Papadopoulos’s cooperation with the federal government is unlikely to have included wearing a wire or otherwise surreptitiously recording anyone in Mr. Trump’s orbit, according to court documents and analyses by legal experts.
That is because the conditions that were set on Mr. Papadopoulos following his arrest in July prevented him from contacting people associated with the Trump campaign, and those conditions appeared to remain in place through at least early October.
Mr. Papadopoulos was “directed not to have any contact, direct or indirect, with individuals related to the campaign or to any of the conduct set forth in the complaint,” prosecutor Andrew Goldstein told Judge Randolph Moss at Mr. Papadopoulos’s plea agreement hearing in early October, according to a transcript."
https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-big-question-in-washington-how-has-papadopoulos-aided-investigators-1509528631eric a blair wrote:
yes, your campaign chair was a massive criminal.
And why don't you discuss papadopoulis? a campaign advisor who lies to the FBI!
I'm seeing a pattern here - do you?
Hint: criminals and people who lie about meeting with russians.
the sad thing here is that everyone knew Trump was a criminal...he's paid fortunes in fines and penalties, been caught stealing and frauding, robbed charities, stiffed business partners, been caught cheating on his taxes...we all knew this.
So it's no surprise that here we are, not even a year into his presidency, and he has surrounded himself with criminals, with liars, with people who again and again lie on their disclosure forms. And who have started to be arrested.
Flies are attracted by shlt, and trump is that shlt.
We'll get a lot more indictments from mueller and the states.
it was all so obvious. Fanboys.
L L wrote:
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
Well given that the alternative was HRC, the most corrupt, incompetent and overall despicable candidate in the history of the good ol USA, you're right.
Ccorrupt, incompetent and overall despicable perfectly defines Trump.
Sorry not even a close race.
Democrats are Muslims.
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
L L wrote:
Ccorrupt, incompetent and overall despicable perfectly defines Trump.
Sorry not even a close race.
excellent!
You've found something that HRC has been caught doing. Please show us. Because my understanding, from being around for a long time, is that republicans have been investigating her for oh 30 years and found absolutely nothing.
sometimes...get this...sometimes...they investigate her twice! for the same thing. Sometimes three times! It's amazing. They find nothing!
but you've found something.
I'll stand by.
Meanwhile, here's a litlte of what trump has admitted to. but as you know, there is a ton more.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/09/01/trump-pays-irs-a-penalty-for-his-foundation-violating-rules-with-gift-to-florida-attorney-general/?utm_term=.2bea9735271djust trying get your blood going, so you can be properly motivated to show me what HRC has been caught doing.
now? Maybe you see a pattern that Mueller is going to lock in to.
Donald J Trump is a criminal and when you get a dozen highly motivated prosecutors and investigators looking through his finances, they are going to find a lot more of where this came from.
Another one:
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/28/us/politics/donald-trump-housing-race.html
eric a blair wrote:
now? Maybe you see a pattern that Mueller is going to lock in to.
Donald J Trump is a criminal and when you get a dozen highly motivated prosecutors and investigators looking through his finances, they are going to find a lot more of where this came from.
Another one:
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/28/us/politics/donald-trump-housing-race.html
The reality is HRC has been protected for years...........people in high places with ties to her corrupt (but entertaining) worthless excuse for a husband. An FBI agent relative of mine told me once that the nickname for the Clinton's were the "Clinton Crime Family", and were untouchable because of their ties to well placed people in the justice dept and government. I'll come back in another 40 or so pages and see how the discussion is going..............amazing to me that people (meaning you and a few select others) have nothing better to do with their time but wait to respond to each and every post, which means that you have no job, or aren't very productive at the one you do have. Either way, time to get a life.
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
eric a blair wrote:
now? Maybe you see a pattern that Mueller is going to lock in to.
Donald J Trump is a criminal and when you get a dozen highly motivated prosecutors and investigators looking through his finances, they are going to find a lot more of where this came from.
Another one:
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/28/us/politics/donald-trump-housing-race.htmlThe reality is HRC has been protected for years...........people in high places with ties to her corrupt (but entertaining) worthless excuse for a husband. An FBI agent relative of mine told me once that the nickname for the Clinton's were the "Clinton Crime Family", and were untouchable because of their ties to well placed people in the justice dept and government. I'll come back in another 40 or so pages and see how the discussion is going..............amazing to me that people (meaning you and a few select others) have nothing better to do with their time but wait to respond to each and every post, which means that you have no job, or aren't very productive at the one you do have. Either way, time to get a life.
In other words, you've got nothing. Zip. Zilch.
Good job!
noted that you agree HRC has not been found to have committed any crimes, any collusions, any corruptions.
Glad we are on the same page.
Now you need to figure out why you would support an outright admitted criminal in the WH.
eric a blair wrote:
noted that you agree HRC has not been found to have committed any crimes, any collusions, any corruptions.
Glad we are on the same page.
Now you need to figure out why you would support an outright admitted criminal in the WH.
I would suggest that you note to whom you are responding and then craft your response accordingly.
POI! wrote:
eric a blair wrote:
noted that you agree HRC has not been found to have committed any crimes, any collusions, any corruptions.
Glad we are on the same page.
Now you need to figure out why you would support an outright admitted criminal in the WH.
I would suggest that you note to whom you are responding and then craft your response accordingly.
right - I was talking to SMTC, not you
He really wants to name the tax bill the Cut Cut Cut Act.
This is not a joke, I mean it is, but you know what I mean.
This is what happens when you cultivate a political culture that is completely resistant to scrutinizing police behavior in a serious manner. Just like the Priesthood is bound to draw a mix of good, spiritual-minded people and evil child molesters, professions in public safety are going to attract both decent public servants and sh*theads looking for some power to lord over people. Doing everything you can to eliminate the latter is not an attack on the former. If anything, it is the opposite.
There is no doubt that police departments across the country (aka THE GOVERNMENT) have been infiltrated to some degree by bigots and mini-autocrats with axes to grind. It is simply inevitable given our long-time nonsensical resistance to police accountability and oversight. Saying "enough" and demanding more isn't racial politics, it's just good government. If the people (Republicans) who give the law enforcement community as a whole every benefit of the doubt placed a similar level of trust and confidence in the other classes of public employees, I'd be much less inclined to believe that their motives for doing so stemmed from maliciousness rather than naivete.
you've got to be kidding me me me wrote:
He really wants to name the tax bill the Cut Cut Cut Act.
This is not a joke, I mean it is, but you know what I mean.
I mean, that's probably just about as far as his knowledge of this tax "reform" effort goes. He knows it cuts taxes and he knows that's supposed to be good. I'd give a finger to have him try to publicly explain some of the nuances of this plan. (Given his comments on "clean coal" it seems entirely within the realm of possibility that someone had to explain to him that the SALT deduction is not a write-off for cooking expenses.)