Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

The shocking truth is out!!!

http://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Melania-Trump1-800x430.jpg

http://images.indianexpress.com/2015/09/caitlyn-jenner1-759.jpg

Melania = Caitlyn wrote:

The shocking truth is out!!!

http://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Melania-Trump1-800x430.jpghttp://images.indianexpress.com/2015/09/caitlyn-jenner1-759.jpg

Here is a fine example of libbbtard credibility! 😂

You really are very "special creatures"

You libbbtards😂😂😂

ItsBaddude wrote:

At least we can agree that this cancer needs to be removed. It looks like Trump will *accelerate* the mission against ISIS.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/03/08/marines-arrive-in-syria-in-support-fight-for-raqqa-defense-official-says.html

Libbbtards ARE A CANCER.

Only 1 way to "cure" cancer.

STSBO wrote:

The truth shall set u free wrote:

I just read your post to the disturbed troll and I had to chuckle. On a fundamental level, there really is no difference between you two. I'm a little surprised, but not that much I guess.

You just lost a ton of credibility.

He never had a ton of credibility to begin with. At best he lost a mcg of credibility. Though even that is being generous.

I used to try and understand his point. I disagreed but tried to get his position. Now who he is is clear. Too bad.

The US Supreme Court says they do. Show me the text in the First, Fifth, Sixth or Fourteenth Amendments that says that they only apply to legal citizens. You can also reference U.S. vs. Wong Kim Ark and Fong Yue Ting vs. U.S.

What legislation has been passed by a US court?

Strange analogy, since we're discussing the protections given by the US Constitution within the confines of the United States. Do I, as an American, have the right to enslave a non-citizen here in the US, since you are stating that the Thirteenth Amendment doesn't protect non-citizens from enslavement? That's what you're arguing when you state (incorrectly) that the Constituion applies only to legal citizens.

Don't laws against libel and slander already exist?

But I thought the press went lock in step with the Obama Administration.

foo wrote:

Not my day wrote:

Wait, I thought Mexico was paying for it?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/to-fund-border-wall-trump-administration-weighs-cuts-to-coast-guard-airport-security/2017/03/07/ba4a8e5c-036f-11e7-ad5b-d22680e18d10_story.html?utm_term=.17e4ff68bd4f

Brilliant, so build an ineffective wall which supposedly increasees our security and do it by cutting funding for agencies that actually do protect us. Only Trump could come up with this backwards plan.

If the Trump administration has to go that far to build a wall, they are simply grasping for straws. The wall is close to dead.

That is a very good point. The coast guard has had a critical role in preventing illegal entrance. Why cut their funding?

The horrendous increase in other military spending at a time where we already outspend the combined expenditures of our nearest rivals is foolhardy.

I do get surprised by his loyal followers and who either just accept or deny his record of pathological lying. No president has lied so consistently with such a little regard for the truth.

Even ideas of his which I could support, I just don't believe.

Nevermind the fact that if a wall is built, an additional Coast Guard presence would likely be needed to intercept those who decide to take a boat from Tijuana to California, or Reynosa/etc to South Padre Island, or wherever the heck they decide to land.

Oh please.. wrote:

Nevermind the fact that if a wall is built, an additional Coast Guard presence would likely be needed to intercept those who decide to take a boat from Tijuana to California, or Reynosa/etc to South Padre Island, or wherever the heck they decide to land.

Excellent point.

yuiop wrote:

Use morons wrote:

Pssst, pssst- Trump won EVERY SINGLE income group over $50K. HRC won the under $50K crowd.

Upper middle class folks from the suburbs (the largest, and the fastest growing portion of the population) voted in favor of Trump.

Sorry man, just the facts. Media narratives are fun though!

Sources? I take it you're one of the uneducated that helped Trump win?!

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/education-not-income-predicted-who-would-vote-for-trump/

If you call a bachelors in engineering and masters degree in economics as uneducated, then yeah, I guess.

Are there people that still don't know this was the outcome and that the media narratives were all total BS...which, of course, was an attempt to "undermine democracy" by flat out lying to the nation?...

for the record, I think it is a totally valid point to make about trump that he won the rich vote:

He is the candidate of the rich people - he did indeed win the wealthy vote.

So it makes total sense for him to be giving his voters tax breaks and freebies at the cost of the poor people. It's called tending to your base. Totally normal.

The weird part is that so many people think the majority of his voters were 'forgotten' in some way - but no, they are wealthy republicans.

I don't think the majority of Trump's voters were wealthy people. He didn't have over 30 million wealthy people vote for him.

Maybe the majority of wealthy people were Trump voters.

But most people that voted for him were working class people.

The difference in the election were people that believed he would create higher paying manufacturing jobs and such.

Or those that believed the fake anti Hillary news stories created by the Russians that people shared on Facebook.

decent short summary of the russia - trump connections. it's an opinion piece, not news, but lays out some facts.

to my mind the interesting facts are

-virtually everyone in the trump campaign has ties to Russia/FSU in some way. That's just bizarre.

-Several of the high level trump people have lied about having contacts with the Russkies. If one lied, well that can be simple mistake or one bad apple. But I think it's something like 5 high end trump guys, including trump, have lied about meeting with russian government officials during the campaign. So many liars...is that a coincidence or are they hiding something? Or do they simply take their lead from Trump, who lies about virtually everything?

-Trump's attack on Obama and the IC is fascinating. As Kristof points out, those attacks could be a sign of trump knowing the investigations are closing in on him and possible collusion.

This is just my opinion now - but to my mind trump is so amoral that he wouldn't have even seen anything wrong with collusion with the Russians to get help with the election - he probably thought that was normal and fine. Becaause that kind of thing is how he does business.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/09/opinion/connecting-trumps-dots-to-russia.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2Fnicholas-kristof&action=click&contentCollection=opinion&region=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=collection

The real summary is the fact that you are a butthurt libbbtard still crying over the compete and utter DECIMATION of libbbtardism😂

If anyone is willing to look around, there are countless conservatives and right-leaning journalists calling out Trump for his Russia ties. It remains a partisan issue in Congress and among those wearing thick idealogical glasses, but anyone looking at this objectively can see this isn't going to end well. This will be much bigger than Watergate. #46 #Pence

Also this guy wrote:

Blows me away that he'd come back to these boards again. I know it's anonymous, but still. Dude was DECIMATED.

He must think that anonymously posting recited drivel on messageboards matters? Or maybe he's just decided to use his old login name again? LOL

What stage of grief is he working his way through? LOL

Only shows that you couldn't handle it if you made an incorrect prediction. I don't care about any of that. I stayed away for awhile for a few reasons, but none of them had to do with being wrong that Trump would win. It was shocking to me that Trump won, and I do have grief about it, but for now that grief is for the fools that voted for him. My pockets potentially get more full with a Trump Presidency that allows companies to do whatever the F they want to do. Blue collar workers get nothing and will soon see that Trump can not and will not bring back jobs from the 90s to them. He is bad for the country and the poorest role model I can think of for a President. He shows that it is OK to lie all the time. It's not.

btshtcrzy wrote:

If anyone is willing to look around, there are countless conservatives and right-leaning journalists calling out Trump for his Russia ties. It remains a partisan issue in Congress and among those wearing thick idealogical glasses, but anyone looking at this objectively can see this isn't going to end well. This will be much bigger than Watergate. #46 #Pence

right - and one more thing - trump was furious when sessions recused himself. I'm sure part of that was because Trump's attitude is 'never back down for any reason'

but also

Sessions was a shield at Justice - in theory he could protect Trump in some way. So Sessions' recusal exposes Trump's flank a bit

Nice deflection attempt trying to put this back on me. Grasping for straws in every area- Love it. HAHAHA

You stayed away because you looked like a jergoff, jergoff. Nothing you say can change that. Like you would have stayed away if HRC won (for other, undisclosed reasons). Jergoff.

I like your strategy of pressing the fact that "you're doing fine now anyway." Totally unpredictable there! HAHA

You've got to ask yourself why all these counties that Obama won didn't have the same confidence in "more of the same" from Hillary? If they were benefitting from the Democratic policies at all, don't you think they'd want to stay the course?

Bottom line is she sucked, and brought nothing to the table but a vaaggiinnaa... which are nice and everything... but not to be trusted in this case.

not really disagreeing, but another reason for the trump win is that blacks and hispanics didn't turn up to vote in teh numbers the did for obama.

the margins were tiny, and if just 75,000 more blacks and hispanics in detroit, milwaukee and Pennsylvania showed up to vote HRC would have won.

obviouslymany moving pictures, but to me the failure of turnout is the main story in 2016...it suggests that the Dems may have to run a black or hispanic person to win in 2020.