according to this study, 3 vaccine doses effectively prevents all future heart attacks
Greatest medicine of all time?
Or, it’s a crap meta analysis with poor controls for confounding.
Results: Bayesian meta-analysis revealed a link between vaccines and CAD risk (OR, 1.70; 95% CrI: 1.11–2.57), particularly after BNT162b2 (OR, 1.64; 95% CrI: 1.06–2.55) and second dose (OR, 3.44; 95% CrI: 1.99–5.98). No increased risk of heart attack, arrhythmia, or stroke was observed post-COVID-19 vaccination. As the only noteworthy point, a protective effect on stroke (OR, 0.19; 95% CrI: 0.10–0.39) and myocardial infarction (OR, 0.003; 95% CrI: 0.001–0.006) was observed after the third dose of the vaccine.
Lol that OR is hilarious. Love when anti-vaxxers froth at the mouth over data the is unambiguously pro-vaccine.
Yeah now that it's cool to be gay, I can confirm I have seen the gay kids at school become part of the "popular kids' crowd by my senior year last year. Back in 7th/8th grade, the 2 kids who were openly gay were kinda shunned. I always assumed they became popular because other people "grew up" mentally and opened their minds. But perhaps their minds were changed by changing times instead.
according to this study, 3 vaccine doses effectively prevents all future heart attacks
Greatest medicine of all time?
Or, it’s a crap meta analysis with poor controls for confounding.
Results: Bayesian meta-analysis revealed a link between vaccines and CAD risk (OR, 1.70; 95% CrI: 1.11–2.57), particularly after BNT162b2 (OR, 1.64; 95% CrI: 1.06–2.55) and second dose (OR, 3.44; 95% CrI: 1.99–5.98). No increased risk of heart attack, arrhythmia, or stroke was observed post-COVID-19 vaccination. As the only noteworthy point, a protective effect on stroke (OR, 0.19; 95% CrI: 0.10–0.39) and myocardial infarction (OR, 0.003; 95% CrI: 0.001–0.006) was observed after the third dose of the vaccine.
Lol that OR is hilarious. Love when anti-vaxxers froth at the mouth over data the is unambiguously pro-vaccine.
The only thing hilarious is your inability to read and face reality.
Let me break the tables down for you, because I know vaccine-damaged brains can be a little slow...
Results: Bayesian meta-analysis revealed a link between vaccines and CAD risk (OR, 1.70; 95% CrI: 1.11–2.57), particularly after BNT162b2 (OR, 1.64; 95% CrI: 1.06–2.55) and second dose (OR, 3.44; 95% CrI: 1.99–5.98). No increased risk of heart attack, arrhythmia, or stroke was observed post-COVID-19 vaccination. As the only noteworthy point, a protective effect on stroke (OR, 0.19; 95% CrI: 0.10–0.39) and myocardial infarction (OR, 0.003; 95% CrI: 0.001–0.006) was observed after the third dose of the vaccine.
Lol that OR is hilarious. Love when anti-vaxxers froth at the mouth over data the is unambiguously pro-vaccine.
The only thing hilarious is your inability to read and face reality.
Let me break the tables down for you, because I know vaccine-damaged brains can be a little slow...
Results: Bayesian meta-analysis revealed a link between vaccines and CAD risk (OR, 1.70; 95% CrI: 1.11–2.57), particularly after BNT162b2 (OR, 1.64; 95% CrI: 1.06–2.55) and second dose (OR, 3.44; 95% CrI: 1.99–5.98). No increased risk of heart attack, arrhythmia, or stroke was observed post-COVID-19 vaccination. As the only noteworthy point, a protective effect on stroke (OR, 0.19; 95% CrI: 0.10–0.39) and myocardial infarction (OR, 0.003; 95% CrI: 0.001–0.006) was observed after the third dose of the vaccine.
Lol that OR is hilarious. Love when anti-vaxxers froth at the mouth over data the is unambiguously pro-vaccine.
The only thing hilarious is your inability to read and face reality.
Let me break the tables down for you, because I know vaccine-damaged brains can be a little slow...
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Overall: OR 1.70 (95% CrI: 1.11–2.57) → 70% increased risk BNT162b2 (Pfizer): OR 1.64 (95% CrI: 1.06–2.55) → 64% increased risk Second dose (all vaccines): OR 3.44 (95% CrI: 1.99–5.98) → 244% increased risk
Myocardial Infarction (MI) Second dose (all vaccines): OR 3.86 (95% CrI: 2.28–6.60) → 286% increased risk BNT162b2 (Pfizer): OR 1.87 (95% CrI: 1.22–2.89) → 87% increased risk Second dose of BNT162b2: OR 3.84 (95% CrI: 2.21–6.66) → 284% increased risk
Stroke BNT162b2 (Pfizer): OR 2.09 (95% CrI: 1.36–3.21) → 109% increased risk First dose of BNT162b2: OR 3.69 (95% CrI: 2.13–6.37) → 269% increased risk First dose (any vaccine): OR 3.40 (95% CrI: 1.98–5.86) → 240% increased risk
Arrhythmia First dose (any vaccine): OR 2.99 (95% CrI: 1.20–7.44) → 199% increased risk ChAdOx1 (AstraZeneca): OR 8.11 95% CrI: 3.67–17.99) → 711% increased risk First dose of ChAdOx1: OR 4.89 (95% CrI: 1.21–19.38) → 389% increased risk
But I guess I'd have to dismiss it outright too if I were worshiping at the altar of "tHe ScIeNcE."
Can't wait till September when the autism report comes out!
Let's quote the authors directly rather than embarrassingly cherry pick sub group analysis because we are desperate for the vaccine to be deadly::
No increased risk of heart attack, arrhythmia, or stroke was observed post-COVID-19 vaccination. As the only noteworthy point, a protective effect on stroke (OR, 0.19; 95% CrI: 0.10–0.39) and myocardial infarction (OR, 0.003; 95% CrI: 0.001–0.006) was observed after the third dose of the vaccine. While acknowledging potential side effects, our findings support the overall safety of the COVID-19 vaccine concerning cardiovascular complications such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and arrhythmia.
Of course, if we wish to slice and dice, we have to accept that 3 vaccine doses is greatest lifesaving miracle in history with a 99% reduction in heart attacks.
To be clear, one of the more pernicious antivaxxers "sub 9 bro" is now claiming that the Pfizer CEO took ivermectin for COVID and received a "placebo vaccine."
This is the same person who detests being called an 'antivaxxer' and asserts their stances are completely precautionary and rational.
I fix my prices to the Kory scale: $1600 for a 60 min session
Will this session be a 60 minute incoherent rant about Djokovic? I can log onto this thread a hear you do that for free. I want value for my money.
But seriously, about Djokovic. Did he sleep with your girlfriend or something? You have a peculiar fascination with him. What’s the reason for bringing him into nearly every conversation?
I fix my prices to the Kory scale: $1600 for a 60 min session
Will this session be a 60 minute incoherent rant about Djokovic? I can log onto this thread a hear you do that for free. I want value for my money.
But seriously, about Djokovic. Did he sleep with your girlfriend or something? You have a peculiar fascination with him. What’s the reason for bringing him into nearly every conversation?
Incoherent is what those who don’t understand my diagnostic genius claim. Don’t get salty.
Will this session be a 60 minute incoherent rant about Djokovic? I can log onto this thread a hear you do that for free. I want value for my money.
But seriously, about Djokovic. Did he sleep with your girlfriend or something? You have a peculiar fascination with him. What’s the reason for bringing him into nearly every conversation?
Incoherent is what those who don’t understand my diagnostic genius claim. Don’t get salty.
And no, that’s extra
When labeled incoherent, your response is an awkward, incoherent sentence. Smh I expect more from my GP.
But back to Djokovic. Did he sleep with your girlfriend or something? You have a peculiar fascination with him. What’s the reason for bringing him into nearly every conversation?
To be clear, one of the more pernicious antivaxxers "sub 9 bro" is now claiming that the Pfizer CEO took ivermectin for COVID and received a "placebo vaccine."
This is the same person who detests being called an 'antivaxxer' and asserts their stances are completely precautionary and rational.
Didn’t you just tell another poster “Don’t get salty?” Just simply playing your stupid game and using words such as likely and we will never truly know. Which is accurate.
I have no idea whether he did or didn’t and I don’t really care. I also don’t care about your insatiable and desperate need to characterize everyone as anti-vaxxers and responsible for all the measles deaths. It’s as stupid as ascribing all the nephro/hepatotoxic drugs given too late and for too long, followed by ventilator, deaths to you because you are aligned with the anti-libertarian institutional apparatus. So, basically you’re responsible for 500,000 deaths for being an idiot.
Just found out my vax pushing doctor suffered a pulmonary emboli about a year and a half ago, as well as my best friend. These things keep me up at night.
Incoherent is what those who don’t understand my diagnostic genius claim. Don’t get salty.
And no, that’s extra
When labeled incoherent, your response is an awkward, incoherent sentence. Smh I expect more from my GP.
But back to Djokovic. Did he sleep with your girlfriend or something? You have a peculiar fascination with him. What’s the reason for bringing him into nearly every conversation?
Djokovic flipped Harambe the bird, and well, you see, the self proclaimed smartest man on these boards who quotes (mischaracterizes) Nietzsche isn’t about to be disrespected and wrong for all the “right” reasons. The extraordinary preoccupation is comical, I have to admit.