This thread was deleted by a volunteer moderator. I certainly don't want a thread this big deleted so I've restored. THat being said, this thread has served it's purpose. I've closed it to new posts.
We have a new 2024 vaccine thread here. New people don't need to try to wade through 20,000 posts to figure out what is going on.
-
22
-
okyoun1 wrote:
Most outdated, Scientifically irrelevant thread in lrc currently. Obviously, those posting here are tribal fighting for their Team: Donkey vs Elephant
Most relevant and important thread on the lrc and in the world, until the people behind the Covid Hoax, the CDC "treatment" protocols, and the "vaccines" are brought to justice. Until then they'll just keep on keeping on with their crimes against humanity.
Remdesivir may be the most despised drug in American history, earning the nickname Run Death Is Near for its lethal record during COVID. Experts claimed that it would stop COVID; instead, it stopped kidney function, then blasted the liver and other organs. Now this reviled destroyer of kidneys has been approved by the FDA for COVID treatment of kidney patients. Does anybody else feel as if the FDA is shoving its power in our faces and laughing at us?
I've been joining online support groups for people who lost loved ones to the Remdesivir Protocol — a nightmarish sequence in which a patient is isolated in the hospital, bullied into taking Remdesivir, ventilated, and then sedated to death. Thousands of Americans were killed this way, possibly hundreds of thousands.
These support groups are a deeply somber business. Grieving faces fill the screen of people who lost a parent, spouse, sibling, or child. Some speak with icy anger; some choke back sobs as they tell of the deadly abuse inflicted on their loved ones, shattering their families forever.
I asked them what they thought of the FDA's decision to approve Remdesivir for people with severe renal impairment, including dialysis. "Morally, how can you do that?" Joyce Wilson said. "It's a death sentence. They didn't care if people had kidney issues or not. My husband went into the hospital in kidney distress. They exacerbated it with Remdesivir. Then they ventilated him, and he died."
72 -
Alex Jones Was Rightt wrote:
okyoun1 wrote:
Most outdated, Scientifically irrelevant thread in lrc currently. Obviously, those posting here are tribal fighting for their Team: Donkey vs Elephant
Most relevant and important thread on the lrc and in the world, until the people behind the Covid Hoax, the CDC "treatment" protocols, and the "vaccines" are brought to justice. Until then they'll just keep on keeping on with their crimes against humanity.
Remdesivir may be the most despised drug in American history, earning the nickname Run Death Is Near for its lethal record during COVID. Experts claimed that it would stop COVID; instead, it stopped kidney function, then blasted the liver and other organs. Now this reviled destroyer of kidneys has been approved by the FDA for COVID treatment of kidney patients. Does anybody else feel as if the FDA is shoving its power in our faces and laughing at us?
I've been joining online support groups for people who lost loved ones to the Remdesivir Protocol — a nightmarish sequence in which a patient is isolated in the hospital, bullied into taking Remdesivir, ventilated, and then sedated to death. Thousands of Americans were killed this way, possibly hundreds of thousands.
These support groups are a deeply somber business. Grieving faces fill the screen of people who lost a parent, spouse, sibling, or child. Some speak with icy anger; some choke back sobs as they tell of the deadly abuse inflicted on their loved ones, shattering their families forever.
I asked them what they thought of the FDA's decision to approve Remdesivir for people with severe renal impairment, including dialysis. "Morally, how can you do that?" Joyce Wilson said. "It's a death sentence. They didn't care if people had kidney issues or not. My husband went into the hospital in kidney distress. They exacerbated it with Remdesivir. Then they ventilated him, and he died."
Yep, this absolutely happened. Remdesivir followed by midozolam-propofol-ketamine sedation protocol. Multiple hospital contacts have corroborated this. Tens of thousands of patients died this way, which was then attributed to death by Covid.
It’s amazing as I sit here to think how many healthy people were duped into taking an unnecessary vaccine. It’s quite mind boggling really.
61 -
Why did nothing show up in the Remdesivir clinical trial then?
See page 50, 51 here:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2007764/suppl_file/nejmoa2007764_appendix.pdf
Honest question.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.34 -
Covidiocy wrote:
Alex Jones Was Rightt wrote:
Most relevant and important thread on the lrc and in the world, until the people behind the Covid Hoax, the CDC "treatment" protocols, and the "vaccines" are brought to justice. Until then they'll just keep on keeping on with their crimes against humanity.
Remdesivir may be the most despised drug in American history, earning the nickname Run Death Is Near for its lethal record during COVID. Experts claimed that it would stop COVID; instead, it stopped kidney function, then blasted the liver and other organs. Now this reviled destroyer of kidneys has been approved by the FDA for COVID treatment of kidney patients. Does anybody else feel as if the FDA is shoving its power in our faces and laughing at us?
I've been joining online support groups for people who lost loved ones to the Remdesivir Protocol — a nightmarish sequence in which a patient is isolated in the hospital, bullied into taking Remdesivir, ventilated, and then sedated to death. Thousands of Americans were killed this way, possibly hundreds of thousands.
These support groups are a deeply somber business. Grieving faces fill the screen of people who lost a parent, spouse, sibling, or child. Some speak with icy anger; some choke back sobs as they tell of the deadly abuse inflicted on their loved ones, shattering their families forever.
I asked them what they thought of the FDA's decision to approve Remdesivir for people with severe renal impairment, including dialysis. "Morally, how can you do that?" Joyce Wilson said. "It's a death sentence. They didn't care if people had kidney issues or not. My husband went into the hospital in kidney distress. They exacerbated it with Remdesivir. Then they ventilated him, and he died."
Yep, this absolutely happened. Remdesivir followed by midozolam-propofol-ketamine sedation protocol. Multiple hospital contacts have corroborated this. Tens of thousands of patients died this way, which was then attributed to death by Covid.
It’s amazing as I sit here to think how many healthy people were duped into taking an unnecessary vaccine. It’s quite mind boggling really.
No it didn't lol. Even if it's real (it's not) -- "tens of thousands of people" could not possible have died from it.
That's just elementary innumeracy. As usual you are seduced by anecdotes from fellow contrarians.
34 -
RunK wrote:
2600 bro wrote:
If “already discussed” subjects meant everyone was in agreement… we wouldn’t have this thread would we?
It’s enjoyable to think about, discuss, and learn more about subjects where isn’t rock solid consensus yet - or at least a vocal minority that disagrees. That’s why we are here.
It’s intellectually timid to simply refuse to state your beliefs, the assumptions and data that led you to those beliefs and what kind of evidence might lead you to change those beliefs.
There’s no consensus on my vaccination status?
You sure are posting a lot for someone 'not mad' and 'not an antivaxxer' lol
38 -
NFL players were forced to get the clot shot. I watched KJ Hamler since his Penn State days.
This post was edited 57 seconds after it was posted.63 -
2600 bro wrote:
Harambe wrote:
You sure are posting a lot for someone 'not mad' and 'not an antivaxxer' lol
Yeah I stopped caring.
Covidicy at least tries to have a conversation.I attempted to have a conversation long ago. When I pressed both of you about why you thought the paper was garbage all I got was ANTI-VAXXER!!!!! No conversation, no attempt to answer.
You guys got called out on your BS and you’re upset - or as one of you so eloquently puts it, “butthurt.” I get it. Rather than defend your position, it’s been days of incessant “butthurtness” from you two. Rather than attack your position, you attack the poster. Maybe after you finish second year Bio this fall you’ll be ready for that conversation you are so longing for.
I know, I know. ANTI-VAXXER!!!!!53 -
RunK wrote:
2600 bro wrote:
Yeah I stopped caring.
Covidicy at least tries to have a conversation.I attempted to have a conversation long ago. When I pressed both of you about why you thought the paper was garbage all I got was ANTI-VAXXER!!!!! No conversation, no attempt to answer.
You guys got called out on your BS and you’re upset - or as one of you so eloquently puts it, “butthurt.” I get it. Rather than defend your position, it’s been days of incessant “butthurtness” from you two. Rather than attack your position, you attack the poster. Maybe after you finish second year Bio this fall you’ll be ready for that conversation you are so longing for.
I know, I know. ANTI-VAXXER!!!!!
I laid out why I didn’t don’t care about that paper and provided alternatives I take seriously. Maybe you forgot… reading comprehension or something?
Whats your vaccination status?
Have the COVID 19 vaccines saved and will continue to save millions of lives?
Do the benefits of vaccinations outweigh the risks for all groups? If not, why?
35 -
2600 bro wrote:
RunK wrote:
I attempted to have a conversation long ago. When I pressed both of you about why you thought the paper was garbage all I got was ANTI-VAXXER!!!!! No conversation, no attempt to answer.
You guys got called out on your BS and you’re upset - or as one of you so eloquently puts it, “butthurt.” I get it. Rather than defend your position, it’s been days of incessant “butthurtness” from you two. Rather than attack your position, you attack the poster. Maybe after you finish second year Bio this fall you’ll be ready for that conversation you are so longing for.
I know, I know. ANTI-VAXXER!!!!!
I laid out why I didn’t don’t care about that paper and provided alternatives I take seriously. Maybe you forgot… reading comprehension or something?
Whats your vaccination status?
Have the COVID 19 vaccines saved and will continue to save millions of lives?
Do the benefits of vaccinations outweigh the risks for all groups? If not, why?
I apologize. I didn’t see your post until now. I’ve been busy busting on you Trumpers on the Trump indictment thread.
Oooh a quiz! I love quizzes. Here are my answers in no particular order:Yes
Ringo (duh, of course)
Diego Maradona
Medium rare
732 -
2600 bro wrote:
RunK wrote:
I attempted to have a conversation long ago. When I pressed both of you about why you thought the paper was garbage all I got was ANTI-VAXXER!!!!! No conversation, no attempt to answer.
You guys got called out on your BS and you’re upset - or as one of you so eloquently puts it, “butthurt.” I get it. Rather than defend your position, it’s been days of incessant “butthurtness” from you two. Rather than attack your position, you attack the poster. Maybe after you finish second year Bio this fall you’ll be ready for that conversation you are so longing for.
I know, I know. ANTI-VAXXER!!!!!
I laid out why I didn’t don’t care about that paper and provided alternatives I take seriously. Maybe you forgot… reading comprehension or something?
Whats your vaccination status?
Have the COVID 19 vaccines saved and will continue to save millions of lives?
Do the benefits of vaccinations outweigh the risks for all groups? If not, why?
Oh yeah. I have a quiz for you.
Why did you feel it necessary to report me to the mods? Lol32 -
RunK wrote:
2600 bro wrote:
I laid out why I didn’t don’t care about that paper and provided alternatives I take seriously. Maybe you forgot… reading comprehension or something?
Whats your vaccination status?
Have the COVID 19 vaccines saved and will continue to save millions of lives?
Do the benefits of vaccinations outweigh the risks for all groups? If not, why?
I apologize. I didn’t see your post until now. I’ve been busy busting on you Trumpers on the Trump indictment thread.
Oooh a quiz! I love quizzes. Here are my answers in no particular order:
Yes
Ringo (duh, of course)
Diego Maradona
Medium rare
7I mean if you wanna talk about Trump?!? Weird but:
Trump putting the admins full weight being Operation Warp Speed was one of best executive actions of all time.
Those answers are far too semantically linked to be truly random - you can do better.
Excellent discourse as always. You will escape an “off topic” report for at least attempting to answer my questions.23 -
2600 bro wrote:
RunK wrote:
I apologize. I didn’t see your post until now. I’ve been busy busting on you Trumpers on the Trump indictment thread.
Oooh a quiz! I love quizzes. Here are my answers in no particular order:
Yes
Ringo (duh, of course)
Diego Maradona
Medium rare
7I mean if you wanna talk about Trump?!? Weird but:
Trump putting the admins full weight being Operation Warp Speed was one of best executive actions of all time.
Those answers are far too semantically linked to be truly random - you can do better.
Excellent discourse as always. You will escape an “off topic” report for at least attempting to answer my questions.
Your boy doesn’t seem to like the vaccine now though. Why is that?
First, you guys were bragging about Trump doing something in months that the “experts” said would take years. Then all of a sudden you guys turned against it. What happened?32 -
RunK wrote:
2600 bro wrote:
I mean if you wanna talk about Trump?!? Weird but:
Trump putting the admins full weight being Operation Warp Speed was one of best executive actions of all time.
Those answers are far too semantically linked to be truly random - you can do better.
Excellent discourse as always. You will escape an “off topic” report for at least attempting to answer my questions.
Your boy doesn’t seem to like the vaccine now though. Why is that?
First, you guys were bragging about Trump doing something in months that the “experts” said would take years. Then all of a sudden you guys turned against it. What happened?
we’ve always been fans of Trumps vaccine here
22 -
The myocarditis risk post-jab is no longer debatable
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejhf.2978
and to those who claim the risk is greater after covid, it's time to stop lying to yourselves. The largest and most definitive study of its kind thoroughly debunks these 'coping' claims...33 -
Harambe wrote:
RunK wrote:
Your boy doesn’t seem to like the vaccine now though. Why is that?
First, you guys were bragging about Trump doing something in months that the “experts” said would take years. Then all of a sudden you guys turned against it. What happened?
we’ve always been fans of Trumps vaccine here
Let me guess. ANTI-VAXXER!!!!!!
13 -
kleito wrote:
The myocarditis risk post-jab is no longer debatable
and to those who claim the risk is greater after covid, it's time to stop lying to yourselves. The largest and most definitive study of its kind thoroughly debunks these 'coping' claims...A year old. Completely superseded by better data and new analyses that show the risk is not more pronounced than other vaccines and significantly lower than COVID itself.
All these have been linked here. Do try and keep up.
42 -
Ah, I missed the first paper you linked. That is recent. However it shows zero evidence of clinically important injury. You'd find worse if you looked at people directly after COVID infection.
The paper states as much:
Given the small extent of acute cardiomyocyte injury in our study, i.e. cTnT levels of about one-fourth of those observed in patients with spontaneous myopericarditis,10 and its transient nature, good long-term outcomes can be expected. COVID-19 associates with a substantially higher risk for myocarditis that mRNA vaccination33, and myocarditis related to COVID-19 infection has shown a higher mortality than myocarditis related to mRNA-vaccination.34,35 Thus, for the majority of individuals, the overall very favorable risk-benefit ratio of booster immunizationspersists.14,15,36-39You should read the stuff you post, or you end up supporting the pro-vax stance :)
This post was edited 18 seconds after it was posted.42
