This thread was deleted by a volunteer moderator. I certainly don't want a thread this big deleted so I've restored. THat being said, this thread has served it's purpose. I've closed it to new posts.
We have a new 2024 vaccine thread here. New people don't need to try to wade through 20,000 posts to figure out what is going on.
Well then remind me: what are you defending? I am happy to do the research for you… again 😄
I like talking about data - let’s do it!
NOW you want to have a discussion. Lol
How about you start by explaining your position in your own words and not just post a couple links that were obvious you didn’t even read.
Please include some irrelevant analogies and extraneous subjects. Make sure it is so general that you could be discussing any subject and no one would be the wiser. Reference something that I didn’t bring up and make sure that is the crux of your argument. Don’t forget to call me an antivaxxer a few times too for good measure.
1) mRNA vaccines remain very effective against severe disease and death
2) Minimal evidence for functionally deleterious tolerance from mRNA vaccination; and zero evidence for tolerance outweighing the benefits of vaccination.
How about you start by explaining your position in your own words and not just post a couple links that were obvious you didn’t even read.
Please include some irrelevant analogies and extraneous subjects. Make sure it is so general that you could be discussing any subject and no one would be the wiser. Reference something that I didn’t bring up and make sure that is the crux of your argument. Don’t forget to call me an antivaxxer a few times too for good measure.
1) mRNA vaccines remain very effective against severe disease and death
2) Minimal evidence for functionally deleterious tolerance from mRNA vaccination; and zero evidence for tolerance outweighing the benefits of vaccination.
That’s like two rabbits walking down the road and one says Hoppy Easter and the other bear keeps walking. Not surprising from an antivaxxer like you though. The sun does rise in the east and sets on the west unless you live on Mars where all bets are off.
Anyone who spends more than a few days on Cape Cod (the Cape) quickly becomes a coastal geologist, quickly learning the rhythms of daily tides and the seasonal cycles of beaches growing and being swept away by storms; swimmer...
You think 2.5 doses of mRNA vaccine will result in hair loss, but the graph you posted doesn’t show that. Only a rabid antivaxxer believes the Ellen Degeneris washes dishes for a living. Hair loss is not a comorbidity. Books about cooking shows don’t even tell you about hair loss. Keep watching them though. Antivaxxer. The hair loss is like FloJo’s nails. You can’t keep the gloss off without watching Beetlejuice two times. Not the new one. Antivaxxer.
1) mRNA vaccines remain very effective against severe disease and death
2) Minimal evidence for functionally deleterious tolerance from mRNA vaccination; and zero evidence for tolerance outweighing the benefits of vaccination.
That’s like two rabbits walking down the road and one says Hoppy Easter and the other bear keeps walking. Not surprising from an antivaxxer like you though. The sun does rise in the east and sets on the west unless you live on Mars where all bets are off.
You think 2.5 doses of mRNA vaccine will result in hair loss, but the graph you posted doesn’t show that. Only a rabid antivaxxer believes the Ellen Degeneris washes dishes for a living. Hair loss is not a comorbidity. Books about cooking shows don’t even tell you about hair loss. Keep watching them though. Antivaxxer. The hair loss is like FloJo’s nails. You can’t keep the gloss off without watching Beetlejuice two times. Not the new one. Antivaxxer.
How did I do?
Yikes, embarrassing, but I knew you’d pull the “it’s all a joke” when you were asked to actually engage in discussion.
Carry on - you all are always good for a laugh.
But on the off chance you’re interested… do you agree with either of my statements. If not why?
That’s like two rabbits walking down the road and one says Hoppy Easter and the other bear keeps walking. Not surprising from an antivaxxer like you though. The sun does rise in the east and sets on the west unless you live on Mars where all bets are off.
You think 2.5 doses of mRNA vaccine will result in hair loss, but the graph you posted doesn’t show that. Only a rabid antivaxxer believes the Ellen Degeneris washes dishes for a living. Hair loss is not a comorbidity. Books about cooking shows don’t even tell you about hair loss. Keep watching them though. Antivaxxer. The hair loss is like FloJo’s nails. You can’t keep the gloss off without watching Beetlejuice two times. Not the new one. Antivaxxer.
How did I do?
Yikes, embarrassing, but I knew you’d pull the “it’s all a joke” when you were asked to actually engage in discussion.
Carry on - you all are always good for a laugh.
But on the off chance you’re interested… do you agree with either of my statements. If not why?
Oh. I thought we were trading roles. This time you pretended to be me and made a couple of coherent statements. And then I pretended to be you and posted a couple links with zero relevance to the conversation and babbled on nonsensically while throwing in a straw man or two and screamed “antivaxxer” at someone who made no anti-vax statements.
Did an MDPI journal reject you again, buddy? You are riled up. Got any more op-eds you want to vociferously defend for no reason?
Nah. I just get enjoyment from exposing blowhards who when pressed can’t defend their position. Lol
Sir, yes, sir. Can I be dismissed sir?
I'm not the one defending a position! You're the one posting op-eds and pretending they mean something. But, hey, I'm used to the antivaxx tendency to try and drum up fear without even understanding the basic biology that's being discussed.
The vaccine stays winning. You even got your shots!
Oh. I thought we were trading roles. This time you pretended to be me and made a couple of coherent statements. And then I pretended to be you and posted a couple links with zero relevance to the conversation and babbled on nonsensically while throwing in a straw man or two and screamed “antivaxxer” at someone who made no anti-vax statements.
That’s not what we’re doing now?
Hmmmm.... you're definitely acting like an antivaxxer
1) butthurt
2) angry
3) refuses to post data or make an argument
4) won't acknowledge basic facts about vaccine efficacy
Will you admit that that vaccine is efficacious for groups for which it is approved?
Will you admit that there is no evidence for any excess deaths related to the vaccine?
Oh. I thought we were trading roles. This time you pretended to be me and made a couple of coherent statements. And then I pretended to be you and posted a couple links with zero relevance to the conversation and babbled on nonsensically while throwing in a straw man or two and screamed “antivaxxer” at someone who made no anti-vax statements.
That’s not what we’re doing now?
Hmmmm.... you're definitely acting like an antivaxxer
1) butthurt
2) angry
3) refuses to post data or make an argument
4) won't acknowledge basic facts about vaccine efficacy
Will you admit that that vaccine is efficacious for groups for which it is approved?
Will you admit that there is no evidence for any excess deaths related to the vaccine?
Nah. I just get enjoyment from exposing blowhards who when pressed can’t defend their position. Lol
Sir, yes, sir. Can I be dismissed sir?
I'm not the one defending a position! You're the one posting op-eds and pretending they mean something. But, hey, I'm used to the antivaxx tendency to try and drum up fear without even understanding the basic biology that's being discussed.
The vaccine stays winning. You even got your shots!
ANTI VAXXER!!!!!!!
I do love how you’ve tried to twist it around like I need to defend a position. You’re the one who posted that the paper was garbage and then when I pressed several times, you refused to state why you had that opinion.
Oh. I thought we were trading roles. This time you pretended to be me and made a couple of coherent statements. And then I pretended to be you and posted a couple links with zero relevance to the conversation and babbled on nonsensically while throwing in a straw man or two and screamed “antivaxxer” at someone who made no anti-vax statements.
That’s not what we’re doing now?
Hmmmm.... you're definitely acting like an antivaxxer
1) butthurt
2) angry
3) refuses to post data or make an argument
4) won't acknowledge basic facts about vaccine efficacy
Will you admit that that vaccine is efficacious for groups for which it is approved?
Will you admit that there is no evidence for any excess deaths related to the vaccine?
Then I'll agree: you're not an antivaxxer.
Until then.... I'm afraid the slipper still fits.
Oooh. A quiz. I love quizzes.
In no particular order:
Yes The Holy Roman Empire Ella Fitzgerald Lincoln, Jefferson, Roosevelt, Washington Only when I eat cranberries 13, but it could have been 14. I forget sometimes.
Yikes, embarrassing, but I knew you’d pull the “it’s all a joke” when you were asked to actually engage in discussion.
Carry on - you all are always good for a laugh.
But on the off chance you’re interested… do you agree with either of my statements. If not why?
Oh. I thought we were trading roles. This time you pretended to be me and made a couple of coherent statements. And then I pretended to be you and posted a couple links with zero relevance to the conversation and babbled on nonsensically while throwing in a straw man or two and screamed “antivaxxer” at someone who made no anti-vax statements.
That’s not what we’re doing now?
It would be funny I had ever heard a coherent or germane statement from you.
Hmmmm.... you're definitely acting like an antivaxxer
1) butthurt
2) angry
3) refuses to post data or make an argument
4) won't acknowledge basic facts about vaccine efficacy
Will you admit that that vaccine is efficacious for groups for which it is approved?
Will you admit that there is no evidence for any excess deaths related to the vaccine?
Then I'll agree: you're not an antivaxxer.
Until then.... I'm afraid the slipper still fits.
Oooh. A quiz. I love quizzes.
In no particular order:
Yes The Holy Roman Empire Ella Fitzgerald Lincoln, Jefferson, Roosevelt, Washington Only when I eat cranberries 13, but it could have been 14. I forget sometimes.
Why can’t you disprove Harambes post? Shouldn’t it be easy?
Yes The Holy Roman Empire Ella Fitzgerald Lincoln, Jefferson, Roosevelt, Washington Only when I eat cranberries 13, but it could have been 14. I forget sometimes.
Why can’t you disprove Harambes post? Shouldn’t it be easy?
Lol. It would have been less obvious if you would have used the username “Not Harambe.”
Objective To examine the association between the omicron adapted bivalent mRNA covid-19 booster vaccines received as a fourth dose and risk of adverse events. Design Nationwide cohort study. Setting Denmark. Participants 2 22...
