This thread was deleted by a volunteer moderator. I certainly don't want a thread this big deleted so I've restored. THat being said, this thread has served it's purpose. I've closed it to new posts.
We have a new 2024 vaccine thread here. New people don't need to try to wade through 20,000 posts to figure out what is going on.
The pandemic relief was the biggest bailout in history, and it opened the door to wide-scale fraud the likes of which no one had ever seen — more than three years later, we still don’t know h…
This graph is almost certainly made by a paranoid schizophrenic. I feel bad for the brain that put that together. Care to explain what the 900 annotations mean that resolve the conflict with the real data?
To follow up: here’s the real data on deaths 0-25 (exclude the lag in recent weeks)
No bro… you didn’t remove the deaths and do the correction to make deaths start going up in 2021. Also it’s 3300 extra deaths a year on my chart - all due to my correction - but I’m gonna make it seem MASSIVE because… subscribe to my substack… plz.
That which is presented without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Deal with it
You obviously don’t know enough about the subject to even attempt to BS your way out of it.
You got caught making a claim that you can’t back up. Deal with it.
If there is no evidence to refute how can it be refuted. He moved all the data that didn’t fit his hypothesis. Found 3000 extra deaths per year, drew a line on it and called it “MASSIVE.”
It’s like a dude filming a 59 second 400, claiming his camera broke and he went on to run a sub 4 mile - and you claiming “prove he didn’t run a sub 4 mile”.
"Aha" 6: What is fascinating is that, in the 0-14 age band, there was negative excess in 2020 and then deaths returned to the level as expected in June 2021
I do not have an immediate explanation for the "negative excess" in 2020
I could draw a sick line on this plot and make it seem like 0-14 excess deaths are going up when they are actually just returning to long run normal after decreasing during the pandemic.
You obviously don’t know enough about the subject to even attempt to BS your way out of it.
You got caught making a claim that you can’t back up. Deal with it.
If there is no evidence to refute how can it be refuted. He moved all the data that didn’t fit his hypothesis. Found 3000 extra deaths per year, drew a line on it and called it “MASSIVE.”
It’s like a dude filming a 59 second 400, claiming his camera broke and he went on to run a sub 4 mile - and you claiming “prove he didn’t run a sub 4 mile”.
It’s hilarious.
SMFH
Idiot. We’re not talking about that graph.
Go back to the little kids table and prep for that Bio 200 class this semester.
You obviously don’t know enough about the subject to even attempt to BS your way out of it.
You got caught making a claim that you can’t back up. Deal with it.
More ranting about an evidence free claim
Dismissed!
You’re just mad because you got called out. Keep throwing fits. I love it.
Just remember the next time you attempt to refute a paper you don’t have the base knowledge to comprehend, I may be lurking, waiting to pounce on you again. 👍
If there is no evidence to refute how can it be refuted. He moved all the data that didn’t fit his hypothesis. Found 3000 extra deaths per year, drew a line on it and called it “MASSIVE.”
It’s like a dude filming a 59 second 400, claiming his camera broke and he went on to run a sub 4 mile - and you claiming “prove he didn’t run a sub 4 mile”.
It’s hilarious.
SMFH
Idiot. We’re not talking about that graph.
Go back to the little kids table and prep for that Bio 200 class this semester.
Oh that, I already gave you actually research articles that support their claims with primary data and they are directed at the hypothesis from the review you tout. I did your work for you. Thank for sticking around to remind me.
Mindlessly owning antivaxxers is so commonplace for me I forget what I did even a day ago:)
That review was like an old dude recording a YouTube video of himself talking about meeting someone who watched Bannister break 4 - we want the video of Bannister breaking and then we want 5 other dudes to do it and show reproduction is possible.
To extend the analogy further: I understand you are weirdly drawn the “old dude talks about stuff” type videos but they are very poor ways to present evidence or get taken seriously.
Go back to the little kids table and prep for that Bio 200 class this semester.
Oh that, I already gave you actually research articles that support their claims with primary data and they are directed at the hypothesis from the review you tout. I did your work for you. Thank for sticking around to remind me.
Mindlessly owning antivaxxers is so commonplace for me I forget what I did even a day ago:)
That review was like an old dude recording a YouTube video of himself talking about meeting someone who watched Bannister break 4 - we want the video of Bannister breaking and then we want 5 other dudes to do it and show reproduction is possible.
To extend the analogy further: I understand you are weirdly drawn the “old dude talks about stuff” type videos but they are very poor ways to present evidence or get taken seriously.
What? That post was something else. Lol Sipping the formaldehyde in that Bio class of yours?
Oops. Sorry for responding. I forgot I’ve been dismissed. :)
Oh that, I already gave you actually research articles that support their claims with primary data and they are directed at the hypothesis from the review you tout. I did your work for you. Thank for sticking around to remind me.
Mindlessly owning antivaxxers is so commonplace for me I forget what I did even a day ago:)
That review was like an old dude recording a YouTube video of himself talking about meeting someone who watched Bannister break 4 - we want the video of Bannister breaking and then we want 5 other dudes to do it and show reproduction is possible.
To extend the analogy further: I understand you are weirdly drawn the “old dude talks about stuff” type videos but they are very poor ways to present evidence or get taken seriously.
What? That post was something else. Lol Sipping the formaldehyde in that Bio class of yours?
Oops. Sorry for responding. I forgot I’ve been dismissed. :)
Well then remind me: what are you defending? I am happy to do the research for you… again 😄
What? That post was something else. Lol Sipping the formaldehyde in that Bio class of yours?
Oops. Sorry for responding. I forgot I’ve been dismissed. :)
Well then remind me: what are you defending? I am happy to do the research for you… again 😄
I like talking about data - let’s do it!
NOW you want to have a discussion. Lol
How about you start by explaining your position in your own words and not just post a couple links that were obvious you didn’t even read.
Please include some irrelevant analogies and extraneous subjects. Make sure it is so general that you could be discussing any subject and no one would be the wiser. Reference something that I didn’t bring up and make sure that is the crux of your argument. Don’t forget to call me an antivaxxer a few times too for good measure.
