This thread was deleted by a volunteer moderator. I certainly don't want a thread this big deleted so I've restored. THat being said, this thread has served it's purpose. I've closed it to new posts.
We have a new 2024 vaccine thread here. New people don't need to try to wade through 20,000 posts to figure out what is going on.
Lol all the CDC says is you need ONE updated dose, not per year, just ONE.
That could be 3 or 4 total shots as long as one is the updated vaccine. You realize many vaccines required 3-3 doses? You pretty much just posted to show the COVID vaccine is just like every one vaccine - thanks!
“Suggests a study from Yale” from January. The official guideline says up to date = one updated booster
They also recommend you get yearly flu shots! Most people don’t do this! Now that COVID death rates are much more lower and risks are thus way down (thanks to vaccines) it’s not as pressing an issue for most people. I guess it’ll be like the flu shot - some people may see the need for one yearly, others not, but it’s not going to be a massive risk like say… skipping official guidance of 3 doses!
Your faux narrative is down to its last threads 🤠
This post was edited 18 seconds after it was posted.
anti vaxxers enraged that pro vax people aren’t mindlessly demanding yearly boosters - it’s sad when you’re boogeymen (i.e. rational people) just make realistic recommendations and generally enjoy the life COVID vaccines have enabled.
Not everyone can or wants to live in the made up online outrage sphere
anti vaxxers enraged that pro vax people aren’t mindlessly demanding yearly boosters - it’s sad when you’re boogeymen (i.e. rational people) just make realistic recommendations and generally enjoy the life COVID vaccines have enabled.
Not everyone can or wants to live in the made up online outrage sphere
can't handle the fact that not everyone was as dumb as you were?
maybe instead of being bitter about being tricked, try to do something while you're still here
I can tell by your seething and your refusal to get the booster that you know in your heart you f*cked up
anti vaxxers enraged that pro vax people aren’t mindlessly demanding yearly boosters - it’s sad when you’re boogeymen (i.e. rational people) just make realistic recommendations and generally enjoy the life COVID vaccines have enabled.
Not everyone can or wants to live in the made up online outrage sphere
The goal posts get moved so often it is dizzying. First it was a scam to get more than one shot and proof that it didn't work and was gene manipulation, etc, etc. Then they claimed vaccines were going to be needed forever. Now they cry foul because they were wrong about that but blame people for not needing them.
But I was promised mass global death because of the jab. Where are they? Are we still doing the "right around the corner" promise?
The poster posted a paper that you quickly said was garbage without providing a defense. Would you like a second chance to specifically defend your position?
A review article isn’t a research paper. It has no data. It’s just musing about possibilities. They have a time and place; for surveying knowledge in a field. But it certainly isn’t an example of good evidence or data to support to a theory.
“Suggests a study from Yale” from January. The official guideline says up to date = one updated booster
They also recommend you get yearly flu shots! Most people don’t do this! Now that COVID death rates are much more lower and risks are thus way down (thanks to vaccines) it’s not as pressing an issue for most people. I guess it’ll be like the flu shot - some people may see the need for one yearly, others not, but it’s not going to be a massive risk like say… skipping official guidance of 3 doses!
Your faux narrative is down to its last threads 🤠
except there is zero evidence the vaccines have done a single positive thing in the fight against this man made (but protected by fools) "virus". None
the inital bioweapon took out fat people and the weak, as it was most likely intended. Once that wave passed thru, it was beatable by normal body defenses and antibodies. i knew 2 people who had it recently and they were both vaxxed. brony heart attack. hamlin. foxx. these are not outliers, these are the ones they cannot hide.
A review article isn’t a research paper. It has no data. It’s just musing about possibilities. They have a time and place; for surveying knowledge in a field. But it certainly isn’t an example of good evidence or data to support to a theory.
Would you like a third chance?
I want actual data. You don’t know what a review article is, do you? Did you read it? Be honest. I want actual evidence for IgG4 based immune tolerance to COVID in humans from vaccination. Not speculative reviews.
Antivaxxers now: accept my theories as fact or… 😡😡
“Suggests a study from Yale” from January. The official guideline says up to date = one updated booster
They also recommend you get yearly flu shots! Most people don’t do this! Now that COVID death rates are much more lower and risks are thus way down (thanks to vaccines) it’s not as pressing an issue for most people. I guess it’ll be like the flu shot - some people may see the need for one yearly, others not, but it’s not going to be a massive risk like say… skipping official guidance of 3 doses!
Your faux narrative is down to its last threads 🤠
except there is zero evidence the vaccines have done a single positive thing in the fight against this man made (but protected by fools) "virus". None
the inital bioweapon took out fat people and the weak, as it was most likely intended. Once that wave passed thru, it was beatable by normal body defenses and antibodies. i knew 2 people who had it recently and they were both vaxxed. brony heart attack. hamlin. foxx. these are not outliers, these are the ones they cannot hide.
Single positive thing:
Saving tens of millions of lives globally
Reducing excess deaths in the US to zero
Returning the world to normalcy
I guess if you thrive on the victimization and COVID conspiracy stuff… these are all negatives! You got me there!
anti vaxxers enraged that pro vax people aren’t mindlessly demanding yearly boosters - it’s sad when you’re boogeymen (i.e. rational people) just make realistic recommendations and generally enjoy the life COVID vaccines have enabled.
Not everyone can or wants to live in the made up online outrage sphere
can't handle the fact that not everyone was as dumb as you were?
maybe instead of being bitter about being tricked, try to do something while you're still here
I can tell by your seething and your refusal to get the booster that you know in your heart you f*cked up
we can see right through you bud
Antivaxxers: Why U demand yearly booster you sheep - see vaccines don’t work!
Reality: You don’t need yearly boosters because the vaccines work great - check the death rates.
Antivaxxers: Well… yeah… YOURE STUPID and in your heart you know I’m right!
I want actual data. You don’t know what a review article is, do you? Did you read it? Be honest. I want actual evidence for IgG4 based immune tolerance to COVID in humans from vaccination. Not speculative reviews.
Antivaxxers now: accept my theories as fact or… 😡😡
Ok. So your answer is no. It makes you look like a fool when you state something is garbage and then are unable to articulate a reason why you think so when called out on it.
DanM, you are the best. COVID conspiracy has made you a remarkable person.
nobody has to "own" you guys
you owned yourselves by injecting yourselves multiple times with a totally-worthless-at-best, fatal-at-worst experimental 'vaccine' for a virus your age bracket had a 99.99+% chance of surviving and that posed minimal adverse events for anyone remotely healthy who followed commonsense protocols (i.e., not what Fauci and clan convinced you was right)
it's really a shame, because now you have to waste every day trying to convince yourselves and us by making dozens of asinine posts asserting you weren't duped and were the smart ones all along listening to 'the experts' literally paid to shill for the product you needlessly injected
the fact that you (a) caved to the injection, and (b) defend your masters so willingly just further proves what you made obvious from the beginning: you're weak
Inherently and undeniably.
Most people have moved on, admitting it was bullsh*t and fear-mongering, but you guys can't admit that (because you're weak) so you squirm about trying to protect your egos as the evidence of your retarded decisionmaking increases daily
lol I can't imagine being so pathetic
but if you're genuinely perplexed, and wondering why you're such obvious losers, here's a guide to your psychology:
I want actual data. You don’t know what a review article is, do you? Did you read it? Be honest. I want actual evidence for IgG4 based immune tolerance to COVID in humans from vaccination. Not speculative reviews.
Antivaxxers now: accept my theories as fact or… 😡😡
Ok. So your answer is no. It makes you look like a fool when you state something is garbage and then are unable to articulate a reason why you think so when called out on it.
I’m confused… the paper showed no evidence of immune tolerance to COVID. It’s a speculative review? What am I supposed to do? Just accept it without any evidence?
I think it’s garbage to use as evidence because it’s not evidence? LOL this is getting funny.
anti vaxxers enraged that pro vax people aren’t mindlessly demanding yearly boosters - it’s sad when you’re boogeymen (i.e. rational people) just make realistic recommendations and generally enjoy the life COVID vaccines have enabled.
Not everyone can or wants to live in the made up online outrage sphere
Antivaxxer: “you want boosters for life”
Reasonable person: “no, the data show the 3-4 dose course is very protective for healthy people without other risk factors.”
The poster posted a paper that you quickly said was garbage without providing a defense. Would you like a second chance to specifically defend your position?
A review article isn’t a research paper. It has no data. It’s just musing about possibilities. They have a time and place; for surveying knowledge in a field. But it certainly isn’t an example of good evidence or data to support to a theory.
Any crank can write a speculative review and get it published in a MedLine indexed journal. People with good reasoning ability can tell the difference between primary research, supported reviews, and wild speculation. Gullible contrarians cannot.
