Michelle V wrote:
Davis report wrote:
I have my own list of those that should be sacked but they have all closed ranks and said such that to release the lab results would be harmful to health and Safety , so you can’t have them.
I have no idea who Davis report could be talking about
Well,actually I think we all know who is involved and that includes you.
Hidden evidence and finger prints all over it.
Anyone with a tiny brain would know if you hide evidence the case gets dropped.
Jumbo brain wrote:
Anyone with a tiny brain would know if you hide evidence the case gets dropped.
I know this, the basis of justice.
Can’t hide evidence.
Why is Edwards still banned?
Jumbo brain wrote:
Anyone with a tiny brain would know if you hide evidence the case gets dropped.
Yet Letsrun keeps ignoring thus injustice.
Kavanaugh wrote:
Jumbo brain wrote:
Anyone with a tiny brain would know if you hide evidence the case gets dropped.
I know this, the basis of justice.
Can’t hide evidence.
Why is Edwards still banned?
He is still banned because so many of significance conspired to ban him and thus many would have to carry the can that they can’t find a scape goat to blame for the injustice.
Jumbo brain wrote:
Jumbo brain wrote:
Anyone with a tiny brain would know if you hide evidence the case gets dropped.
Yet Letsrun keeps ignoring thus injustice.
Letsrun have never grasped the complexity of doping control and react with the sophistication of a simpleton sophomore.
Jumbo brain wrote:
Kavanaugh wrote:
I know this, the basis of justice.
Can’t hide evidence.
Why is Edwards still banned?
He is still banned because so many of significance conspired to ban him and thus many would have to carry the can that they can’t find a scape goat to blame for the injustice.
Exactly. It’s not complicated to understand. Very complicated to undo it though.
The Davis Report followed the release of hidden data.
Data that the Doping Lab made all attempts to keep hidden but could not resist the Information Commissioner telling them to release.
This report appears many times on the thread.
It is obvious that a huge amount of new evidence had been hidden.
UKS said that nothing new appeared from the report and then informed the Sports Minister and then Parliament.
How can the Davis Report not contain new evidence as this evidence was withheld and manifestly so by Kings College.
OP of this thread wrote:
Jumbo brain wrote:
He is still banned because so many of significance conspired to ban him and thus many would have to carry the can that they can’t find a scape goat to blame for the injustice.
Exactly. It’s not complicated to understand. Very complicated to undo it though.
Trump would just remove them,simple.
Davis report wrote:
The Davis Report followed the release of hidden data.
Data that the Doping Lab made all attempts to keep hidden but could not resist the Information Commissioner telling them to release.
This report appears many times on the thread.
It is obvious that a huge amount of new evidence had been hidden.
UKS said that nothing new appeared from the report and then informed the Sports Minister and then Parliament.
How can the Davis Report not contain new evidence as this evidence was withheld and manifestly so by Kings College.
The post above should be enough to clear Edwards and cause multiple sacking.
And ,Letsrun to get involved.
Davis report wrote:
The Davis Report followed the release of hidden data.
Data that the Doping Lab made all attempts to keep hidden but could not resist the Information Commissioner telling them to release.
This report appears many times on the thread.
It is obvious that a huge amount of new evidence had been hidden.
UKS said that nothing new appeared from the report and then informed the Sports Minister and then Parliament.
How can the Davis Report not contain new evidence as this evidence was withheld and manifestly so by Kings College.
How can they hide evidence that would clear Edwards?
Davis report wrote:
The Davis Report followed the release of hidden data.
Data that the Doping Lab made all attempts to keep hidden but could not resist the Information Commissioner telling them to release.
This report appears many times on the thread.
It is obvious that a huge amount of new evidence had been hidden.
UKS said that nothing new appeared from the report and then informed the Sports Minister and then Parliament.
How can the Davis Report not contain new evidence as this evidence was withheld and manifestly so by Kings College.
This must be very serious as Parliament was told that which is not what was discovered .
Reader of wrote:
Davis report wrote:
The Davis Report followed the release of hidden data.
Data that the Doping Lab made all attempts to keep hidden but could not resist the Information Commissioner telling them to release.
This report appears many times on the thread.
It is obvious that a huge amount of new evidence had been hidden.
UKS said that nothing new appeared from the report and then informed the Sports Minister and then Parliament.
How can the Davis Report not contain new evidence as this evidence was withheld and manifestly so by Kings College.
How can they hide evidence that would clear Edwards?
Come on, tell me how.
Davis report wrote:
Davis report wrote:
The Davis Report followed the release of hidden data.
Data that the Doping Lab made all attempts to keep hidden but could not resist the Information Commissioner telling them to release.
This report appears many times on the thread.
It is obvious that a huge amount of new evidence had been hidden.
UKS said that nothing new appeared from the report and then informed the Sports Minister and then Parliament.
How can the Davis Report not contain new evidence as this evidence was withheld and manifestly so by Kings College.
This must be very serious as Parliament was told that which is not what was discovered .
This will all be on records of Parliament’s procedures.
Reader of wrote:
Davis report wrote:
The Davis Report followed the release of hidden data.
Data that the Doping Lab made all attempts to keep hidden but could not resist the Information Commissioner telling them to release.
This report appears many times on the thread.
It is obvious that a huge amount of new evidence had been hidden.
UKS said that nothing new appeared from the report and then informed the Sports Minister and then Parliament.
How can the Davis Report not contain new evidence as this evidence was withheld and manifestly so by Kings College.
How can they hide evidence that would clear Edwards?
And, how could they get away with using a hacksaw to open the sample?
H and S expert wrote:
Davis report wrote:
I have my own list of those that should be sacked but they have all closed ranks and said such that to release the lab results would be harmful to health and Safety , so you can’t have them.
Preposterous to hide lab results cos injurious to health.
That is exactly what they put in writing to the Info Commissioner.
This is clear wrote:
Davis report wrote:
The Davis Report followed the release of hidden data.
Data that the Doping Lab made all attempts to keep hidden but could not resist the Information Commissioner telling them to release.
This report appears many times on the thread.
It is obvious that a huge amount of new evidence had been hidden.
UKS said that nothing new appeared from the report and then informed the Sports Minister and then Parliament.
How can the Davis Report not contain new evidence as this evidence was withheld and manifestly so by Kings College.
The post above should be enough to clear Edwards and cause multiple sacking.
And ,Letsrun to get involved.
Still nothing from the sports moral leaders, Letsrun.
ISO 17025 wrote:
To remind; that the head of the Lab was closely involved with the contract with UKS and was the same person who did the analysis.
This is expressly forbidden by the quality management system that applied.
I would assume the reason would be that the person would did the work on the sample was completely separate from the pressures of the conflict of interest.
Yet ISO 17025 breached.
How come no cal data done, wrong ion monitored and fake urine appearing?
Still no answers to these core central problems that would,as a basic rule, never have allowed the results to appear in peer reviewed journals.
Why has the scientific world not complained.
ISO 17025 wrote:
ISO 17025 wrote:
To remind; that the head of the Lab was closely involved with the contract with UKS and was the same person who did the analysis.
This is expressly forbidden by the quality management system that applied.
I would assume the reason would be that the person would did the work on the sample was completely separate from the pressures of the conflict of interest.
Yet ISO 17025 breached.
How come no cal data done, wrong ion monitored and fake urine appearing?
Still no answers to these core central problems that would,as a basic rule, never have allowed the results to appear in peer reviewed journals.
Why has the scientific world not complained.
The ISO 17025 rules were to be fooled by the lab but were not .
Davis report wrote:
ISO 17025 wrote:
Still no answers to these core central problems that would,as a basic rule, never have allowed the results to appear in peer reviewed journals.
Why has the scientific world not complained.
The ISO 17025 rules were to be fooled by the lab but were not .
Basic breaches on a sample that seems to have belong to someone other than Edwards.