Actually it is unreasonable to do that. "Felon" is a term that carries specific information, including someone's being judged guilty of a felony in a court of law. Roger Stone is a felon, though he's never served a day in prison; Hillary Clinton is not (so far), and neither is Donald Trump or Joseph Biden (so far).
It is not for you, or me, or any other individual not directly involved in the adjudication of a case, to declare a priori that X is a felon. The justice system does that.
Nice to know you think OJ didn't do it because he doesn't officially have the verdict.
At least in the Mar-Al-Qualo Stolen Documents case, Trump is going to need jurors with the same IQ and logic abilities as the OJ Simpson jurors. A critical mass of mental retardation on the jury is essential to the Trump defense in that case.
I would never follow any signal man (or woman) to the degree that certain people listen and believe everything Trump says.
since when has any good whatsoever come from a cult like figure...
and i'm not going to adopt someone else's reality...doesn't matter if it's trump, biden, whoever. i am quite shocked that in this day and age, anyone would support a single person so much without ever questioning them
i don't really side with either party - perhaps left if anything - but i'm not about to believe that half the country is united in a conspiracy against my candidate just because I believe my candidate is wonderful
Nice to know you think OJ didn't do it because he doesn't officially have the verdict.
At least in the Mar-Al-Qualo Stolen Documents case, Trump is going to need jurors with the same IQ and logic abilities as the OJ Simpson jurors. A critical mass of mental retardation on the jury is essential to the Trump defense in that case.
He should have just burned everything as soon as they asked for it like Hillary did. Then you'd support his actions.
At least in the Mar-Al-Qualo Stolen Documents case, Trump is going to need jurors with the same IQ and logic abilities as the OJ Simpson jurors. A critical mass of mental retardation on the jury is essential to the Trump defense in that case.
He should have just burned everything as soon as they asked for it like Hillary did. Then you'd support his actions.
The docs would have no value if burned - he's to needy to burn them.
At least in the Mar-Al-Qualo Stolen Documents case, Trump is going to need jurors with the same IQ and logic abilities as the OJ Simpson jurors. A critical mass of mental retardation on the jury is essential to the Trump defense in that case.
He should have just burned everything as soon as they asked for it like Hillary did. Then you'd support his actions.
That ship has sailed, Magoo. Can't burn anything now. Can't even try to hide documents in the baffroom anymore. Feds have all of it. Every freakin' document Trump stole and lied about is photographed, fingerprinted, inventoried, stamped and logged on some giant azz enterprise software servers back at J. Edgar and RFK in DC.
Maybe you're not aware of way classical liberalism is..
From Wikipedia
Classical liberalism is a political tradition and a branch of liberalism that advocates free market and laissez-faire economics; and civil liberties under the rule of law, with special emphasis on individual autonomy, limited government, economic freedom, political freedom and freedom of speech. Classical liberalism, contrary to liberal branches like social liberalism, looks more negatively on social policies, taxation and the state involvement in the lives of individuals, and it advocates deregulation.[1]
Look for the J6 case to go to trial before the stolen documents trial.
I think that would be impossible and the prosecutors won't even propose that. The J6/Fake Electors case is absolutely enormous. It's difficult to comprehend how enormous that case is - maybe hundreds of witnesses. It will take a minimum of 10 weeks to get through it and probably more. And that's just the trial. The amount of pre-trial work for both sides is difficult to describe.
Well, I was way off on this and my other post predicting the prosecution would ask for trial in late 2024 after the Stolen Documents case (May 2024).
Hot off the presses: "The Government proposes that trial begin on January 2, 2024, and estimates that its case in chief will take no longer than four to six weeks."
I think that would be impossible and the prosecutors won't even propose that. The J6/Fake Electors case is absolutely enormous. It's difficult to comprehend how enormous that case is - maybe hundreds of witnesses. It will take a minimum of 10 weeks to get through it and probably more. And that's just the trial. The amount of pre-trial work for both sides is difficult to describe.
Well, I was way off on this and my other post predicting the prosecution would ask for trial in late 2024 after the Stolen Documents case (May 2024).
Hot off the presses: "The Government proposes that trial begin on January 2, 2024, and estimates that its case in chief will take no longer than four to six weeks."
Wow. They must be ready with guns loaded on this.
Trump will welcome this News to rapidly prove his innocence!
lmao! No. Trump will whine like a pathetic two year old and speak like a drunk deranged uncle on his broke social media app and his followers will run to this message board to tell us he speaks the truth.
The government case does not need big guns, just the facts.
He took many boxes of classified documents, stored them in unsecured locations, bragged about it, showed them to people without clearance, lied to the FBI / Archives, lawyers about having them, refused to give them back, tried to hide them with help of his staff (who are now singing to avoid jail). The FBI found them. Trump has no defense here other than "WITCH HUNT!!!" and delay tactics.
He may not go to jail, but he will lose this case. He will likely lose the soon to come cases for election tampering also.
He has a long history of fraud and lies - Trump U. fraud, Trump Org. tax fraud, not paying contractors. He paid off a porn star to not talk about an affair (campaign money fraud), had meetings with Russians to get dirt on rivals, tried to extort Ukraine to get dirt on rivals, tried to change election results and appoint false electors, incited a mob to attack the Capital and more. Just the facts.
The government case does not need big guns, just the facts.
He took many boxes of classified documents, stored them in unsecured locations, bragged about it, showed them to people without clearance, lied to the FBI / Archives, lawyers about having them, refused to give them back, tried to hide them with help of his staff (who are now singing to avoid jail). The FBI found them. Trump has no defense here other than "WITCH HUNT!!!" and delay tactics.
He may not go to jail, but he will lose this case. He will likely lose the soon to come cases for election tampering also.
He has a long history of fraud and lies - Trump U. fraud, Trump Org. tax fraud, not paying contractors. He paid off a porn star to not talk about an affair (campaign money fraud), had meetings with Russians to get dirt on rivals, tried to extort Ukraine to get dirt on rivals, tried to change election results and appoint false electors, incited a mob to attack the Capital and more. Just the facts.
Biden did the same thing.
Minor differences:
Biden had no clearance to have them in the first place.
Biden stole multiple documents over decades.
Biden left his stolen documents in the care of a crack addict who's known for selling himself to foreign powers including Russia and the CCP.
If Democrats didn't have double standards they wouldn't have any standards at all.
Let's say trump loses all the cases, but still gets elected. Instead of concluding that we have issues, that the gov't has lost the consent of the governed, and that we're a divided country, you would just conclude that everyone he didn't vote like you is an idiot "trumper", right?