Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

BREITBART NEWSFLASH: Trump Supporters Begin Burning MAGA Hats in Protest Against Amnesty-For-No-Wall Deal with Dems

Replies to the above:

"He caved, it is over...Illegals and liberals now own our country! He will come for our guns next!"

"Trump sold us down the drain for a few pesos of love from Chuck and Nancy. Shame on him. Burn those MAGA hats."

"LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP!"

"Thank God I saved my money and never bought a MAGA hat!!!! #IMPEACHORRESIGN45!!! You fooled us once, Trump!! NEVER AGAIN!!!"

"Amazing that so many are burying their heads in the sand. Amnesty within the first year of his presidency...not one foot of new wall....no obamacare repeal....nothing. I doubt Hillary would have been able to accomplish this much for the dems.

I was so thrilled about MAGA, but its over. So much opportunity lost, and irreparable damage done before we can try again. Perhaps Rand Paul next time?"

"I believed you Mr. Trump..:("

"TRUMP WAS THE "TROJAN HORSE""

well............. wrote:

Trump moves to the left now wants DACA, works well with Nancy and Chuck,

CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS GO HOME DEVASTATED!

I thought he'd move Left during the campaign.

The WALL, which is already under construction in the form of new renovation of old and existing fences and walls, will continue to be built.

That's the twittering of an idiot who doesn't even have the courage to stick with his xenophobic voters. I guess the racist vote is a bigger group than the ordinary xenophobes.

The Dear Leader has capitulated on the wall. How's that swamp draining going, guys?

pop_pop!_v_2.2.1 wrote:

well............. wrote:

Trump moves to the left now wants DACA, works well with Nancy and Chuck,

CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS GO HOME DEVASTATED!

I thought he'd move Left during the campaign.

The WALL, which is already under construction in the form of new renovation of old and existing fences and walls, will continue to be built.

That's the twittering of an idiot who doesn't even have the courage to stick with his xenophobic voters. I guess the racist vote is a bigger group than the ordinary xenophobes.

The Dear Leader has capitulated on the wall. How's that swamp draining going, guys?

When one has no argument, the fall back is "you're a racist". Pretty lame.

Thanks for posting that, sad. Despite the headline, this article is not really about evangelicals. It's about some groundbreaking research on how people choose what to believe.The bottom line is that we can't really call ourselves a deliberative democracy. We choose our leaders in much the same way a tribe chooses its chief. Our form of democracy has nothing to do with policy preferences of the people, which are overwhelmingly malleable.I think this is something we all realize on some level, but now there is good research to back it up.

sad wrote:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/14/opinion/trump-republicans.html

Trump the Trojan Horse wrote:

BREITBART NEWSFLASH: Trump Supporters Begin Burning MAGA Hats in Protest Against Amnesty-For-No-Wall Deal with Dems

Trump's approval rating may go up now, actually if these Breitbart nuts abandon him.

Fat hurts wrote:

Thanks for posting that, sad. Despite the headline, this article is not really about evangelicals. It's about some groundbreaking research on how people choose what to believe.

The bottom line is that we can't really call ourselves a deliberative democracy. We choose our leaders in much the same way a tribe chooses its chief. Our form of democracy has nothing to do with policy preferences of the people, which are overwhelmingly malleable.

I think this is something we all realize on some level, but now there is good research to back it up.

sad wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/14/opinion/trump-republicans.html

I've had a similar view for a while but couldn't really express it very well. It's remarkable how much consequence there is for a non-deliberative decision. Hundreds of millions of Americans make an essentially binary, sometimes snap decision between two choices. I'm sure there are some single issue voters but even then there are no guarantees that your preferred candidate will do anything that they promise.

Presidential elections are almost like a black box where we get an outcome but no one understands quite how it happened, and then we spend 4 years trying to convince ourselves that we've figured out why a particular candidate won.

Yes. To me the research is shocking in that it shows how quickly and easily a person will change their opinion based on what their preferred candidate says.

I think this research could have never been conducted if it were not for Trump, who changes positions on a whim.

Here's something I didn't know before and I assume it wasn't public.

When Mueller was assigned as special council in the Russia investigation, Trump went off in anger at Sessions for recusing himself. (that was well known)

Sessions then offered his resignation and apparently even gave a resignation letter.

But Trump's people advised him not to accept it because the optics would be real bad if sessions stepped down right after Mueller was assigned.

Imagine how that would have looked. Sessions resigning at the exact moment of Mueller's assigment.

Anyway, here's another article of how Trump demands loyalty but screws over people that were loyal to him.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2017/09/15/daily-202-trump-s-daca-deal-is-another-humiliation-for-jeff-sessions/59bb011f30fb045176650cd1/?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_daily202-739am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.a17b54e25296

L L wrote:

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

L L,

A couple of pages back, I posted about swing voters checking for the chicken on the stove accredited to a president? That's the coal miner vote. That is how Trump got those swing votes.

Let's be real.

Trump got those swing votes by lying to the people.

We'll review this presidency and see if Trump implements any policy that helps coal miners actually get more and better paying jobs.

He got swing votes by lying about a wall that Mexico was going to pay and for lying about healthcare for more people and at a cheaper rate.

First, Trump is a child ruled by impulses just wandering around his life. He obsesses about his own celebrity with no other awareness. He is A fool. You can't compare that to Hillary's cunning.

Whatever Hillary was selling had more likelihood of being turned into policy. But, I'd argue the industrial and labor policy would have been more of the same stuff that is redistributing wealth to the owners of capital, just like Obama. Sure, the Right is more obvious about capitalist welfare programs, but not that far removed from the left.

I argue The Right took the middle class message soon after the.left abandoned industrial and labor policy that favors a middle class sometime in the late 70s.

Don't misunderstand me. The Right never had any intention of building a middle class.. they just took the message.

OK, we are on the same page.

Trump had better messaging for a group of middle class workers.

He is a liar who calls other liars as part of his shtick.

And I guess that message was better at getting votes.

Haven't checked the thread in a while. How's the resignation process going, Flagpole? I didn't think it took this long.

Breitbart LOL

Sean Hannity LOL

Ann Coulter LOL

Proof Trumpsters are Panicing wrote:

Opinion | Trump's top supporters are in a full blown panic. They're right to be afraid.

I clicked expecting the "source" to be an Ann Coulter tweet, and I was not disappointed

If by left wing slant you mean not accepting trump as their all knowing God-child then yes.

This is Antifa.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2017/09/15/ben-shapiro-take-antifa-to-the-woodshed-at-berkeley-youre-a-bunch-of-pathetic-stupidjackasses-n2381905

foo fighter wrote:

This is Antifa.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2017/09/15/ben-shapiro-take-antifa-to-the-woodshed-at-berkeley-youre-a-bunch-of-pathetic-stupidjackasses-n2381905

Yes it is. Total jackasses.