Nobody’s upset that your subjective opinion is different. What they are upset about is you don’t actually have a subjective opinion; you are not willing to commit to a position of who you think the GOAT really is and why, only who it isn’t based on irrational hatred. Because you know you would be torn asunder.
It’s your lack of courage followed by overconfident, arrogant posting that riles people up. But, then again, that’s your entire goal. Our goal is to keep you slaving away at your keyboard on a daily basis, and it’s working beautifully. We all know that you don’t have it in you to call it good and leave a thread if you don’t get the last word. Prove me wrong. You can’t.
Well even when I explained my thoroughly qualitative analysis you still didn’t accept it, so perhaps you need to be better at convincing Harambe you accept his different beliefs!
Because your qualitative analysis was that he’s the goat because he had the most beautiful game (we all agree) and that he wasn’t as doped as the other guys, but there are many people in the game who disagree with that “analysis.”
In so much as none of them have been busted, then it’s all hearsay. So then you do need to back it up with quantitative criteria. And Federer loses to Djokovic in every category on that front, including head to head play.
Well even when I explained my thoroughly qualitative analysis you still didn’t accept it, so perhaps you need to be better at convincing Harambe you accept his different beliefs!
And Federer loses to Djokovic in every category on that front, including head to head play.
Well yeah because Djoko was doping. I feel like youre messing with me.
one wonders why you three or four are so upset my subjective opinion is different
Lebron is the goat too if we go by era and stats.
Nobody’s upset that your subjective opinion is different. What they are upset about is you don’t actually have a subjective opinion; you are not willing to commit to a position of who you think the GOAT really is and why, only who it isn’t based on irrational hatred. Because you know you would be torn asunder.
It’s your lack of courage followed by overconfident, arrogant posting that riles people up. But, then again, that’s your entire goal. Our goal is to keep you slaving away at your keyboard on a daily basis, and it’s working beautifully. We all know that you don’t have it in you to call it good and leave a thread if you don’t get the last word. Prove me wrong. You can’t.
I have a subjective opinion:
Chokervic is not the goat. and I’ve justified my opinion with evidence
There’s no rule of opinions that says I need to hold any other opinion.
Nobody’s upset that your subjective opinion is different. What they are upset about is you don’t actually have a subjective opinion; you are not willing to commit to a position of who you think the GOAT really is and why, only who it isn’t based on irrational hatred. Because you know you would be torn asunder.
It’s your lack of courage followed by overconfident, arrogant posting that riles people up. But, then again, that’s your entire goal. Our goal is to keep you slaving away at your keyboard on a daily basis, and it’s working beautifully. We all know that you don’t have it in you to call it good and leave a thread if you don’t get the last word. Prove me wrong. You can’t.
I have a subjective opinion:
Chokervic is not the goat. and I’ve justified my opinion with evidence
There’s no rule of opinions that says I need to hold any other opinion.
False. You accused him off doping WITHOUT evidence. The exact same evidence-free accusation could be made of the rest of the ATP rendering the entire point, even if you had proof, without merit.
You made the accusation that it was a "weak era" without evidence. In fact, the facts and evidence demonstrate the exact opposite.
You claimed without evidence that he had long-covid.
You connected the prior evidence-free accusation to his decline. A twofer!
The basis off your opinion is built on a foundation of unsubstantiated accusations, denial and intellectual dishonesty. How wude! /JarJar
What we've learned is that gorillas can also be trolls. Something every day! ;)
False. You accused him off doping WITHOUT evidence. The exact same evidence-free accusation could be made of the rest of the ATP rendering the entire point, even if you had proof, without merit.
You made the accusation that it was a "weak era" without evidence. In fact, the facts and evidence demonstrate the exact opposite.
You claimed without evidence that he had long-covid.
You connected the prior evidence-free accusation to his decline. A twofer!
The basis off your opinion is built on a foundation of unsubstantiated accusations, denial and intellectual dishonesty. How wude! /JarJar
What we've learned is that gorillas can also be trolls. Something every day! ;)
Wrong.
1) the doping accusation is corrorborated by respected tour pros. Think about running. We’d give that weight, no?
2) Half of Chokervics wins came against Kyrgios and the like. That’s a weak era.
3) Chokervic suffered to an “unexplained illness” right when his decline started. This is supporting evidence for my long COVID diagnosis. Especially since he was unvaxxed
These are all important pieces of evidence.
Just because you don’t like them, doesn’t mean they aren’t evidence.
They support my subjective opinion.
Hence, I’ve backed my subjective opinion with evidence.
Note: if you try to argue against the evince above, you are implicitly agreeing they are, in fact, evidence.
A double daily dose of Djokovic GOATness today. All primates and P.E. teachers rejoice.
Not only is he the GOAT on the court, as Harambe has unwittingly proven on this thread, but also a great humanitarian and philanthropist as was highlighted yesterday, but Djokovic is also the cleanest tennis player of all time. In his 22 amazing years as a pro, not once has he failed a drug test. Zero. Nada. Zilch. Testing has netted several high-profile players such as Sinner, Swaitek, Hakep, Sharapova, Agassi, Hingis, Cilic and dozens of others. The GOAT, tested for 22 years, has remained clean. Now that’s evidence.
False. You accused him off doping WITHOUT evidence. The exact same evidence-free accusation could be made of the rest of the ATP rendering the entire point, even if you had proof, without merit.
You made the accusation that it was a "weak era" without evidence. In fact, the facts and evidence demonstrate the exact opposite.
You claimed without evidence that he had long-covid.
You connected the prior evidence-free accusation to his decline. A twofer!
The basis off your opinion is built on a foundation of unsubstantiated accusations, denial and intellectual dishonesty. How wude! /JarJar
What we've learned is that gorillas can also be trolls. Something every day! ;)
Wrong.
1) the doping accusation is corrorborated by respected tour pros. Think about running. We’d give that weight, no?
2) Half of Chokervics wins came against Kyrgios and the like. That’s a weak era.
3) Chokervic suffered to an “unexplained illness” right when his decline started. This is supporting evidence for my long COVID diagnosis. Especially since he was unvaxxed
These are all important pieces of evidence.
Just because you don’t like them, doesn’t mean they aren’t evidence.
They support my subjective opinion.
Hence, I’ve backed my subjective opinion with evidence.
Note: if you try to argue against the evince above, you are implicitly agreeing they are, in fact, evidence.
1) the doping accusation is corrorborated by respected tour pros. Think about running. We’d give that weight, no?
2) Half of Chokervics wins came against Kyrgios and the like. That’s a weak era.
3) Chokervic suffered to an “unexplained illness” right when his decline started. This is supporting evidence for my long COVID diagnosis. Especially since he was unvaxxed
These are all important pieces of evidence.
Just because you don’t like them, doesn’t mean they aren’t evidence.
They support my subjective opinion.
Hence, I’ve backed my subjective opinion with evidence.
Note: if you try to argue against the evince above, you are implicitly agreeing they are, in fact, evidence.
A novella of nothingness. Odd.
As you all railed against subjective opinions. I merely restate my position and look ever more sane.
1) the doping accusation is corrorborated by respected tour pros. Think about running. We’d give that weight, no?
2) Half of Chokervics wins came against Kyrgios and the like. That’s a weak era.
3) Chokervic suffered to an “unexplained illness” right when his decline started. This is supporting evidence for my long COVID diagnosis. Especially since he was unvaxxed
These are all important pieces of evidence.
Just because you don’t like them, doesn’t mean they aren’t evidence.
They support my subjective opinion.
Hence, I’ve backed my subjective opinion with evidence.
Note: if you try to argue against the evince above, you are implicitly agreeing they are, in fact, evidence.
A novella of nothingness. Odd.
Dude is still literally arguing with feelings. Point one: trust me bro, tennis pros who I can’t name and haven’t publicly stated anything is more attempt at objective truth
Point two: I’m going to ignore that one half of the big three era he competed against is basically the same age.
Point three: I’m going to pretend to be a doctor without any personal knowledge of a person and make a ridiculous assertion without anything to back it up
Literally everything he defended with is about his feelings and innuendo. Dude is an absolute joke. I wish this loser would at least feign bringing facts and verifiable evidence to the argument. This is so dull at this point.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.