Paying her $130,000 in hush money is certainly above standard hooker fees but it is undoubtedly paying for sex. He will now pay a criminal penalty for the pleasure.
Daniels is a porn director and actor. I don't know if she was ever a 'hooker' but this was not prostitution. How about we stop throwing that word around in a nasty and unjustified way.
It isn't nasty. Prostitute or "porn actor" - they are both paid for sex.
Paying her $130,000 in hush money is certainly above standard hooker fees but it is undoubtedly paying for sex. He will now pay a criminal penalty for the pleasure.
Daniels is a porn director and actor. I don't know if she was ever a 'hooker' but this was not prostitution. How about we stop throwing that word around in a nasty and unjustified way.
Wrong. Trump paid for sex from this woman. That's what makes this humiliating for Trump and his fans like you. What kind of loser pays for sex?
Total humiliation for you and your ilkhood. Point will always remember Trump as a sex trafficker for cash, and that you guys are all humiliated as human beings. You guys got biffed like geeks.
Wrong. Trump paid for sex from this woman. That's what makes this humiliating for Trump and his fans like you. What kind of loser pays for sex?
Total humiliation for you and your ilkhood. Point will always remember Trump as a sex trafficker for cash, and that you guys are all humiliated as human beings. You guys got biffed like geeks.
So, you're saying that every married man, and in fact every man who ever bought a woman drink or went on a date and paid for it, is a loser?
Wrong. Trump paid for sex from this woman. That's what makes this humiliating for Trump and his fans like you. What kind of loser pays for sex?
Total humiliation for you and your ilkhood. Point will always remember Trump as a sex trafficker for cash, and that you guys are all humiliated as human beings. You guys got biffed like geeks.
So, you're saying that every married man, and in fact every man who ever bought a woman drink or went on a date and paid for it, is a loser?
Seems a bit harsh.
No, I didn't say anything like that. Nothing even close to that bit of cheap cynicism of women. You post like a guy who pays hookers for sex.
The SNL skit last night really scorched my britches. That guy sounds nothing like Trump and their "parody" was nothing short of character assassination.
The SNL skit last night really scorched my britches. That guy sounds nothing like Trump and their "parody" was nothing short of character assassination.
Link please. It sounds like something a majority of us would like to see!
You are allowed to pay off an affair with a porn star. You are not allowed to pay off with other peoples money.
This will get laughed out of court and everyone but the dumbest people in society understand this.
Even Bragg, dumb as he is, knows this indictment is hot garbage.
Doesn't matter. Trump engaged in whoremongering. The humiliation has been outed. Trump pays for sex.
Trump wishes he had never paid the hookers for sex. But you can't go back in time. You can't undo the past. Trump will have to live with his humiliation.
What Trump can do is make sure he doesn't get busted like a whoremongering John again, and add to his humiliation. He should stop paying hookers for sex. He just risks further humiliations.
This will get laughed out of court and everyone but the dumbest people in society understand this.
Even Bragg, dumb as he is, knows this indictment is hot garbage.
Doesn't matter. Trump engaged in whoremongering. The humiliation has been outed. Trump pays for sex.
Trump wishes he had never paid the hookers for sex. But you can't go back in time. You can't undo the past. Trump will have to live with his humiliation.
What Trump can do is make sure he doesn't get busted like a whoremongering John again, and add to his humiliation. He should stop paying hookers for sex. He just risks further humiliations.
Some of his base like that he is the bad boy that effectively sticks the needle in the eye of the elite, the people that have made them subservient, and will like it, esp. since they think it doesn't rise to the level of a crime, but is more of a partisan strategy, and as such, one that requires their participation to thwart it.
The Christian Right, of course, are going to have a harder time looking past the facts.
My bet is that in the big picture, this will be the first of many stains on his record and not terribly important in and of itself, but part of general trend that casts doubt on his suitability for office. If the right can find someone who stands for the same things without the baggage, they might jump ship.
Some of his base like that he is the bad boy that effectively sticks the needle in the eye of the elite, the people that have made them subservient, and will like it, esp. since they think it doesn't rise to the level of a crime, but is more of a partisan strategy, and as such, one that requires their participation to thwart it.
The Christian Right, of course, are going to have a harder time looking past the facts.
My bet is that in the big picture, this will be the first of many stains on his record and not terribly important in and of itself, but part of general trend that casts doubt on his suitability for office. If the right can find someone who stands for the same things without the baggage, they might jump ship.
No, the "Christian" Right will have absolutely no trouble looking past the facts. They have proven this repeatedly. To think otherwise is naive beyond belief.
Some of his base like that he is the bad boy that effectively sticks the needle in the eye of the elite, the people that have made them subservient, and will like it, esp. since they think it doesn't rise to the level of a crime, but is more of a partisan strategy, and as such, one that requires their participation to thwart it.
The Christian Right, of course, are going to have a harder time looking past the facts.
My bet is that in the big picture, this will be the first of many stains on his record and not terribly important in and of itself, but part of general trend that casts doubt on his suitability for office. If the right can find someone who stands for the same things without the baggage, they might jump ship.
No, the "Christian" Right will have absolutely no trouble looking past the facts. They have proven this repeatedly. To think otherwise is naive beyond belief.
You're probably right. What do they tell their children? Do they worry about that?
Donald Trump (James Austin Johnson) interrupts a recreation of The Last Supper.Saturday Night Live. Stream now on Peacock: https://pck.tv/3uQxh4qSubscribe to...
Doesn't matter. Trump engaged in whoremongering. The humiliation has been outed. Trump pays for sex.
Trump wishes he had never paid the hookers for sex. But you can't go back in time. You can't undo the past. Trump will have to live with his humiliation.
What Trump can do is make sure he doesn't get busted like a whoremongering John again, and add to his humiliation. He should stop paying hookers for sex. He just risks further humiliations.
Some of his base like that he is the bad boy that effectively sticks the needle in the eye of the elite, the people that have made them subservient, and will like it, esp. since they think it doesn't rise to the level of a crime, but is more of a partisan strategy, and as such, one that requires their participation to thwart it.
The Christian Right, of course, are going to have a harder time looking past the facts.
My bet is that in the big picture, this will be the first of many stains on his record and not terribly important in and of itself, but part of general trend that casts doubt on his suitability for office. If the right can find someone who stands for the same things without the baggage, they might jump ship.
Paying hookers for sex does not make a person a bad boy. It's incel/loser fetish behavior. Not even his most hardcore fans can get past this humiliation. Trump looks like a fool and a wanker.
He got busted and disgusted. Even Christians can understand wanking traffic humiliation.
I’m still waiting to see that Epstein ‘client’ list. A lot of policy makers and powerful people were boinking PAID underage girls on that island. But hey, let’s focus on Trump banging an adult hooker… I mean, porn star.
I’m still waiting to see that Epstein ‘client’ list. A lot of policy makers and powerful people were boinking PAID underage girls on that island. But hey, let’s focus on Trump banging an adult hooker… I mean, porn star.
Daniels is a porn director and actor. I don't know if she was ever a 'hooker' but this was not prostitution. How about we stop throwing that word around in a nasty and unjustified way.
It isn't nasty. Prostitute or "porn actor" - they are both paid for sex.
Every man in this forum has paid for sex and every woman has accepted it.
I’m still waiting to see that Epstein ‘client’ list. A lot of policy makers and powerful people were boinking PAID underage girls on that island. But hey, let’s focus on Trump banging an adult hooker… I mean, porn star.
you know trump was buds with Epstein, right?
The key word is “was”. You know that Trump kicked him out of Mar A Lago for hitting on young waitresses, right? You know that Trump never went to the island, right?
I’m still waiting to see that Epstein ‘client’ list. A lot of policy makers and powerful people were boinking PAID underage girls on that island. But hey, let’s focus on Trump banging an adult hooker… I mean, porn star.
you know trump was buds with Epstein, right?
LOL, even on Easter Sunday the King of Liberal Deflection deflects yet again. Some people need serious help.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
