How badly is Ossoff going to lose the special election in Georgia's 6th District?

Ossoff is a far left socialist- that is why he lost. He should move to Vermont or San Francisco.

Bernie Junior wrote:

Ossoff is a far left socialist- that is why he lost. He should move to Vermont or San Francisco.

Bernie Junior wrote:

Ossoff is a far left socialist- that is why he lost. He should move to Vermont or San Francisco.

Agree. He is way too left for the established middle ground.

Money not well spent wrote:

Bernie Junior wrote:

Ossoff is a far left socialist- that is why he lost. He should move to Vermont or San Francisco.

https://pbs.twimg.com/tweet_video_thumb/DCztxcFXoAAYHzv.jpg

If that's Venezuelan money, it's not worth much anyway, likely more useful as fuel.

All those millions from California, and this Ossoff loser has a cash bar at his election night HQ's. Three bucks for a water.

https://mobile.twitter.com/bluestein/status/877266101381550082

She returns the ring tomorrow wrote:

All those millions from California, and this Ossoff loser has a cash bar at his election night HQ's. Three bucks for a water.

Wrong. Water AND Soda. (and that pic was already posted here).

Georgia is a Red State!!!!! wrote:

Well, it looks like Handle is going to get a close win now as she inexplicably has decided to not assault anyone which would've guaranteed a Yuge win for her and the GOP. Instead, we'll get a win by < 5 points which will be interpreted by the fake news outlets as 1) a harbinger of things to come in future elections (the GOP is doomed!!!) 2) that Trump is unpopular (LOL!!! Still has 80%+ support in GOP polls) 3) as somehow a win for the Dems (I guess a close loss is a win if you're a serial loser like the libs).

#MAGA

BOOM! MAGA MFers!!!! Now, if Handle would've only followed my advice and slapped a lib or pulled the hair of some fake news peddling leftist she would've won bigly-er by 10+ points!

Flagpole wrote:

What polls are some of you looking at? The ones I see all have Ossoff winning. Seems pollsters need to tweak things a bit though these days, but I'm not sure anyone can be confident of a Handel win just yet.

Of course, having Flagpole weigh in on the LOSING SIDE makes it all the sweeter on LRC.

What these two said after the runoff election:

"I think they will be more motivated to show up than Repubs. For the money that has been spent so far, much more Democratic voter interest and participation has been generated. The republican candidate should have had no problem in this election, but here we are. I think her underperformance can be attributed to a tired and disappointed voter base."

"You guys are making this too complicated. The basic question is will enough republicans show up to vote?"

- TroLLminator

"I think they will be more motivated to show up than Repubs. For the money that has been spent so far, much more Democratic voter interest and participation has been generated. The republican candidate should have had no problem in this election, but here we are. I think her underperformance can be attributed to a tired and disappointed voter base."

-Agip

Yep, whoever called it by 5 points was right.

Flagpole wrote:

What polls are some of you looking at? The ones I see all have Ossoff winning. Seems pollsters need to tweak things a bit though these days, but I'm not sure anyone can be confident of a Handel win just yet.

Damn Russians again, Flagpole.

Damn them all to hell!

Handel with a massive 12,631 vote lead. This was a blowout.

Flagpole wrote:

What polls are some of you looking at? The ones I see all have Ossoff winning...

[/quote]

Dems need to look at smarter polls.

Ossoff lost 52 to 47., just in 2014 the incumbent Republican, Tom Price, won the district by 66 to 33%. So, while disappointing, of course, Ossoff was able to make this quite close for a very red district.

xcvxvxcvx wrote:

Ossoff lost 52 to 47., just in 2014 the incumbent Republican, Tom Price, won the district by 66 to 33%. So, while disappointing, of course, Ossoff was able to make this quite close for a very red district.

That didn't take long. A lib chimes in with a "moral victory" story. Bahahahahahaha!!!!!

xcvxvxcvx wrote:

Ossoff lost 52 to 47., just in 2014 the incumbent Republican, Tom Price, won the district by 66 to 33%. So, while disappointing, of course, Ossoff was able to make this quite close for a very red district.

I guess that's what millions of dollars from California will buy you. Price's opponent in 2016 spent $1,000. Not a serious candidate.

Goody for Ossoff. Give him a lollypop.

xcvxvxcvx wrote:

Ossoff lost 52 to 47., just in 2014 the incumbent Republican, Tom Price, won the district by 66 to 33%. So, while disappointing, of course, Ossoff was able to make this quite close for a very red district.

xcvxvxcvx wrote:

Ossoff lost 52 to 47., just in 2014 the incumbent Republican, Tom Price, won the district by 66 to 33%. So, while disappointing, of course, Ossoff was able to make this quite close for a very red district.

People were doubting Price's opponent even existed. Looking at it that way, I'd say Handel out-performed Price!

Dems are really hating democracy now.

Crowd Chants ‘This Is What Democracy Looks Like’ at Ossoff Party After CNN Calls GA6 for Handel

They would rather make it like Zimbabwe or Venezuela. Hollywood big bucks couldn't buy it. Really going home devastated.