http://www.flotrack.org/video/981480-karissa-schweizer-of-missouri-after-shocking-3rd-in-the-5k
Her 5000 PR was 16:30 until NCAA finals last spring!
Her 5000 PR was 16:30 until NCAA finals last spring!
Just a reminder, if you are complaining about the results or Flo this morning, please email the NCAA with your complaints. It makes a difference.
Team Scores wrote:
Even in a super close race, it doesn't take 20+ minutes. And results aren't held when the timing/scoring is done right.
jk
Wow. This is terrible. Can you think of any sport where they keep the results from the people?
Just post them unoffical.
Here's a photo:
I would rather they take the time to make certain BEFORE announcing the winning team. Remember 3-4 years ago when they announced the winner, then announced a different winner, then finally announced the official winner which was the the team they initially announced (Oregon). I doubt anyone wants that scenario to occur again.
You know that Flotrack is not a timing company correct?
Record Timing is the timer
It would be helpful to see the last mile or so.
riley stops wrote:
ryanhallsoffday wrote:Man if only Flotrack spent as much time getting their live feed right as they do making high quality videodocs.
Honestly I really think they're capable of making awesome feeds if they really put the emphasis on it.
They hire a company to make their videodocs...aka outsource.
What company? I've never heard this.
Benefactor wrote:
http://www.flotrack.org/video/981480-karissa-schweizer-of-missouri-after-shocking-3rd-in-the-5kHer 5000 PR was 16:30 until NCAA finals last spring!
She ran 15:58 at Mt Sac last spring
They go to the video to get it right. Example: runner A's chip (on foot) passes before runner B's chip, but B's torso -- the actual determinant of placing -- passes first. Chip results get overturned on video review.
This exact case happened in 2001 on the men's side, and directly influenced Colorado's one-point win.
I'm trying to host a rabbit feed of the race. Please hop on, but the quality is not too great due to it being flotrack and my university wifi being horrible.
LOL all the spectators going "WHOOoooo TF is that?!??!?!"
wejo wrote:
Here's a photo:
https://twitter.com/USTFCCCA/status/800012377701744640
So the race was over what 30 minutes ago and no team scores yet really wow Flotrack can suck my 9 and half f u flotrack wish the race was still free on ncaa dot com plus it's was great quality feed/stream :( FLOTRACK has ruined track and field/cross wow :(
Not sure what the worst part of this is. Oh yeah, NO means preview coverage. We are currently watching a FLOTrck documentary on NAU.
IT's not like we paid and should expect more for our money....oh yeah....
DII scores were updating as people were crossing. Even with checking the finish line photo at the end. It's not that different from track. And once you have a time + place, you can calculate team scores right away.
they call me flopro wrote:
So the race was over what 30 minutes ago and no team scores yet really wow Flotrack can suck my 9 and half f u flotrack wish the race was still free on ncaa dot com plus it's was great quality feed/stream :( FLOTRACK has ruined track and field/cross wow :(
It's not Flotrack's fault. They aren't timing the race. It is their fault about not having any clue about what they just watched/commentated on though.
I think it's Oregon over CU by about 5 points! Erin Clark not in CU's top five either! If she finishes in the 20's, which would have been an off race, they would have won easily.
Awesome, thanks for posting, it is much appreciated
looking at some video feed of chez warming up and it appears that he is still wearing nike pegasus 30s as his shoes.
They finally realized that Michigan was right there. Unofficially 8 pts between the top 3 (Oregon, Michigan, Colorado). Everyone with a brain knew this at the conclusion of the race.