Flagpole wrote:
EdP wrote:[quote]Flagpole wrote:
Ed, I see you know more than I thought you did. You are correct that you could perhaps avoid fees if you do the ETF as you suggest. Do realize though that with index funds that aren't actively managed, you can pay VERY small fees so that it is pretty much not even a big deal. I would use Vanguard for this. The thing about ETFs is that they can be traded like stocks, and you can day trade or short and so on. That's just not a game I want to get involved in, so I don't, but I'm not against it as a strategy -- just not for me. If you wanted to be a more passive investor, you could open a mutual fund, fill it with index funds and just contribute until you are ready to take the money out -- lots of people do that, and it's not a bad strategy. My advice is to always do 15% toward 401k and Roth IRA first, and those are managed accounts. Beyond that, if you want to buy a mutual fund and fill it with index funds or an ETF then I'm all for either way -- as long as you (not YOU, meaning anyone who does this) are debt free but for a house and you have a manageable mortgage and continue giving 15% toward retirement accounts.
Flagpole, I like your consevative financial planning advice in general, but you've got some problems with your explanation of mutual funds. Maybe replace "mutual fund" in your post with the term "brokerage account" and it would make more sense. A mutual fund, whether actively managed or passively managed (index fund) isn't something you open and fill with other funds or stocks. You use the money in your taxable or retirement account to buy a mutual fund. In doing so you're paying a management fee to let a professional manage the buying and selling of the stocks that it holds. In the case of an index fund you pay a very small fee since they only have to mirror the targeted index. I've got a feeling you know all this but your mixed up terminology clouds the important message your trying to get across.