Please stop it. COC is infallible. Theres a reason why it is the security standard used in testing for military, law, government, etc. If you don't want to hear it you won't.
Yes. A lot of people here think that someone from Nike can make a call and make a positive test go away.
Do I personally think Lagat was doping? Yes. Does that matter in any way? No.
Please stop it. COC is infallible. Theres a reason why it is the security standard used in testing for military, law, government, etc. If you don't want to hear it you won't.
Yes. A lot of people here think that someone from Nike can make a call and make a positive test go away.
Yes, a lot of people here have fetid imaginations.
Agree. People think just because someone is fast and a pro, that they know what they are doing.
They obviously got some things right but it doesn't mean they are training the smartest.
The reason Mantz has gotten to the level he has is because of his training.
The reason Mantz is currently injured is because of his training.
Both can be true and both should be without criticism.
Likely can't have one without the other.
You can have one without the other. Mantz is injured because of the TikTok strength coach and that guy has done nothing but hinder Mantz in his progression.
Erm, when was the last time Mantz was "training smart"? Ever
Agree. People think just because someone is fast and a pro, that they know what they are doing.
They obviously got some things right but it doesn't mean they are training the smartest.
This is a meaningless statement. You could say it about anyone because of course nobody on earth is necessarily training “the smartest.” But I would trust that Mantz knows more about how to train smart than you do, although I am sure you know better somehow.
Please stop it. COC is infallible. Theres a reason why it is the security standard used in testing for military, law, government, etc. If you don't want to hear it you won't.
Yes. A lot of people here think that someone from Nike can make a call and make a positive test go away.
Do I personally think Lagat was doping? Yes. Does that matter in any way? No.
There was no conspiracy.
Two people deciding to do something, discussing that something with each other is a conspiracy. So at minimum, yes, conspiracy involved to get Bernie off the hook.
Yes. A lot of people here think that someone from Nike can make a call and make a positive test go away.
Do I personally think Lagat was doping? Yes. Does that matter in any way? No.
There was no conspiracy.
Two people deciding to do something, discussing that something with each other is a conspiracy. So at minimum, yes, conspiracy involved to get Bernie off the hook.
Two people deciding to do what? Explain how its possible to corrupt the COC? I'll give you 24 hours to put that gender studies degree to work.
Two people deciding to do something, discussing that something with each other is a conspiracy. So at minimum, yes, conspiracy involved to get Bernie off the hook.
Two people deciding to do what? Explain how its possible to corrupt the COC? I'll give you 24 hours to put that gender studies degree to work.
What exactly does they/them/it #1 do?
What exactly does they/them/it #2 do?
That dude is right. Saying something is infallible, believing someone couldn’t possibly lie - or many other things - is ridiculous. Were you there observing the COC? It really does come off as a joke. Oh, someone mishandled the first sample by accident! Whoopsie Daisy! But the second one is OK. Oh, no one at a lab could possibly lie. Or other things. What has gotten into you? You used to be reasonable. Now you’re angry all the time.
There are literally scores of issues that can compromise COC, and other things. Three seconds of internet searching, literally:
….Vulnerabilities in Chain of Custody Despite its importance, the chain of custody is not infallible. Several factors can compromise it:
Potential IssuesDescriptionImproper Handling
Evidence may be mishandled, such as using unclean gloves or improper storage. Documentation Gaps
Missing or incomplete records can lead to questions about the evidence's integrity. Unauthorized Access
If unauthorized individuals handle the evidence, it can be deemed compromised.
Contamination Evidence can be contaminated at the crime / collection scene or during transport or by individuals at evidence testing / holding areas.
There’s lots more, take 5 min to check instead of doing what you do so much of lately, which banning people you don’t agree with.
Two people deciding to do what? Explain how its possible to corrupt the COC? I'll give you 24 hours to put that gender studies degree to work.
What exactly does they/them/it #1 do?
What exactly does they/them/it #2 do?
That dude is right. Saying something is infallible, believing someone couldn’t possibly lie - or many other things - is ridiculous. Were you there observing the COC? It really does come off as a joke. Oh, someone mishandled the first sample by accident! Whoopsie Daisy! But the second one is OK. Oh, no one at a lab could possibly lie. Or other things. What has gotten into you? You used to be reasonable. Now you’re angry all the time.
There are literally scores of issues that can compromise COC, and other things. Three seconds of internet searching, literally:
….Vulnerabilities in Chain of Custody Despite its importance, the chain of custody is not infallible. Several factors can compromise it:
Potential IssuesDescriptionImproper Handling
Evidence may be mishandled, such as using unclean gloves or improper storage. Documentation Gaps
Missing or incomplete records can lead to questions about the evidence's integrity. Unauthorized Access
If unauthorized individuals handle the evidence, it can be deemed compromised.
Contamination Evidence can be contaminated at the crime / collection scene or during transport or by individuals at evidence testing / holding areas.
There’s lots more, take 5 min to check instead of doing what you do so much of lately, which banning people you don’t agree with.
I think ol’ George is just pulling your legs guys.
Two people deciding to do what? Explain how its possible to corrupt the COC? I'll give you 24 hours to put that gender studies degree to work.
What exactly does they/them/it #1 do?
What exactly does they/them/it #2 do?
That dude is right. Saying something is infallible, believing someone couldn’t possibly lie - or many other things - is ridiculous. Were you there observing the COC? It really does come off as a joke. Oh, someone mishandled the first sample by accident! Whoopsie Daisy! But the second one is OK. Oh, no one at a lab could possibly lie. Or other things. What has gotten into you? You used to be reasonable. Now you’re angry all the time.
There are literally scores of issues that can compromise COC, and other things. Three seconds of internet searching, literally:
….Vulnerabilities in Chain of Custody Despite its importance, the chain of custody is not infallible. Several factors can compromise it:
Potential IssuesDescriptionImproper Handling
Evidence may be mishandled, such as using unclean gloves or improper storage. Documentation Gaps
Missing or incomplete records can lead to questions about the evidence's integrity. Unauthorized Access
If unauthorized individuals handle the evidence, it can be deemed compromised.
Contamination Evidence can be contaminated at the crime / collection scene or during transport or by individuals at evidence testing / holding areas.
There’s lots more, take 5 min to check instead of doing what you do so much of lately, which banning people you don’t agree with.
You not supported any real claim. COC insures that every point you've made is invalid. If there was any mishandling of a sample that would be shown when the B sample is tested. Regardless both samples are secured in front of a by the person being tested. Both samples are secured by blind serial numbers.
Please explain how you are you are going to compromise the testing samples? Have you ever actually been tested before? This process has been well thought out. Some kid on the internet isn't going to figure how to beat it because tha procedure has been created to prevent corruption.
Step by step, walk me through it. How are you going to corrupt the testing protocol? Explain it to me like I'm AOC?
That dude is right. Saying something is infallible, believing someone couldn’t possibly lie - or many other things - is ridiculous. Were you there observing the COC? It really does come off as a joke. Oh, someone mishandled the first sample by accident! Whoopsie Daisy! But the second one is OK. Oh, no one at a lab could possibly lie. Or other things. What has gotten into you? You used to be reasonable. Now you’re angry all the time.
There are literally scores of issues that can compromise COC, and other things. Three seconds of internet searching, literally:
….Vulnerabilities in Chain of Custody Despite its importance, the chain of custody is not infallible. Several factors can compromise it:
Potential IssuesDescriptionImproper Handling
Evidence may be mishandled, such as using unclean gloves or improper storage. Documentation Gaps
Missing or incomplete records can lead to questions about the evidence's integrity. Unauthorized Access
If unauthorized individuals handle the evidence, it can be deemed compromised.
Contamination Evidence can be contaminated at the crime / collection scene or during transport or by individuals at evidence testing / holding areas.
There’s lots more, take 5 min to check instead of doing what you do so much of lately, which banning people you don’t agree with.
I think ol’ George is just pulling your legs guys.
Why would you say that? It doesn't make sense. The people posting here don't have any idea how the COC protocol works.
I think ol’ George is just pulling your legs guys.
Why would you say that? It doesn't make sense. The people posting here don't have any idea how the COC protocol works.
You should look up how COC can be circumvented like one guy stated. Tons of court cases thrown out because of “violations”. I don’t think they’re attacking you. They’re probably surprised you have blind faith and trust in something that can be beaten. I think Lagat’s case was simply Nike or other powers applying pressure in the right places. I look at the video of Lagat running 3:26 against El G during the EPO era and he and El G scream things beyond EPO. Can’t prove it now of course, but there are so many factors that have been rehashed a thousand times.
Why would you say that? It doesn't make sense. The people posting here don't have any idea how the COC protocol works.
You should look up how COC can be circumvented like one guy stated. Tons of court cases thrown out because of “violations”. I don’t think they’re attacking you. They’re probably surprised you have blind faith and trust in something that can be beaten. I think Lagat’s case was simply Nike or other powers applying pressure in the right places. I look at the video of Lagat running 3:26 against El G during the EPO era and he and El G scream things beyond EPO. Can’t prove it now of course, but there are so many factors that have been rehashed a thousand times.
Two people deciding to do what? Explain how its possible to corrupt the COC? I'll give you 24 hours to put that gender studies degree to work.
What exactly does they/them/it #1 do?
What exactly does they/them/it #2 do?
That dude is right. Saying something is infallible, believing someone couldn’t possibly lie - or many other things - is ridiculous. Were you there observing the COC? It really does come off as a joke. Oh, someone mishandled the first sample by accident! Whoopsie Daisy! But the second one is OK. Oh, no one at a lab could possibly lie. Or other things. What has gotten into you? You used to be reasonable. Now you’re angry all the time.
There are literally scores of issues that can compromise COC, and other things. Three seconds of internet searching, literally:
….Vulnerabilities in Chain of Custody Despite its importance, the chain of custody is not infallible. Several factors can compromise it:
Potential IssuesDescriptionImproper Handling
Evidence may be mishandled, such as using unclean gloves or improper storage. Documentation Gaps
Missing or incomplete records can lead to questions about the evidence's integrity. Unauthorized Access
If unauthorized individuals handle the evidence, it can be deemed compromised.
Contamination Evidence can be contaminated at the crime / collection scene or during transport or by individuals at evidence testing / holding areas.
There’s lots more, take 5 min to check instead of doing what you do so much of lately, which banning people you don’t agree with.
One thing isn't the same as the other. Crime scene evidence (uncontrolled) isn't the same thing as urine tests (completely controlled). Stay on track.