Camille Herron suing Canadian Runner magazine

Any explanation as to why her autism diagnosis is needed to explain why she posted about filing a lawsuit(bogus or not)?

I assumed most of them were Camille attacking other posters/her competitors.

So how could a lawsuit filed in Arizona get kicked towards a Canadian company operating in Canada?

I have no idea how that would work and I would like to get an explanation from somebody who knows that kind of cross country law stuff.

Barbara Streisand effect in full effect.

Because it sets up that 'Camille reached a state of “Autistic burnout”' leading to her missing training, missing competing, and missing income.

That is actually a quote from her complaint as to one of the way she has been damaged; along with her Lululemon contract being terminated, husband now having to coach again out of state (due to her income being lowered), etc.

Her blog post has to be voiced consistent with the complaint if she wants to keep up that it's a part of her person that is material and relevant to her suit and alleged damages.

The only noteworthy controversy in distance roller skiing is that some wheels had different rolling resistance compared to others... So they set up a standard to measure it.

You so ugly Barrett.

Interesting thing about Barrett is that he made a Youtube video where addressed Camille and was critical of her claiming autism. He's belief was that autism is something you get diagnosed with as a child, not as an adult and she was using it as a cop-out.

Then somehow a switch was flipped and he turned into an advocate for Camille. Odd behavior, but par for the course.