And so you offer only that which is puerile. So how does bicarb make running the 800 "easier" when athletes are still racing to their limits to win? A faster field, if that is what has occurred with bicarb, doesn't make for an easier race. You are a total moran.
More puerile insults. That's all you have. You would know how bicarb can make the 800m easier if you knew about running it.
That is the same as saying that doping makes a race easier. It doesn't. It enables it to be run faster with the same effort. You haven't a clue what you are talking about.
More puerile insults. That's all you have. You would know how bicarb can make the 800m easier if you knew about running it.
That is the same as saying that doping makes a race easier. It doesn't. It enables it to be run faster with the same effort. You haven't a clue what you are talking about.
I do. You don't. I know you don't because you can't answer the simple question I asked you.
That is the same as saying that doping makes a race easier. It doesn't. It enables it to be run faster with the same effort. You haven't a clue what you are talking about.
I do. You don't. I know you don't because you can't answer the simple question I asked you.
The 800 combines aerobic with anaerobic effort - I know this because I used to race and win at it. You wouldn't have. But it is a stupid and irrelevant question because bicarb has no significant effect on how it is raced. But peds do.
I do. You don't. I know you don't because you can't answer the simple question I asked you.
The 800 combines aerobic with anaerobic effort - I know this because I used to race and win at it. You wouldn't have. But it is a stupid and irrelevant question because bicarb has no significant effect on how it is raced. But peds do.
Bicarb > PEDs. This isn't "baking soda" anymore, not once your body can now fullly absorb and utilize it and not have the old downsides.
I do. You don't. I know you don't because you can't answer the simple question I asked you.
The 800 combines aerobic with anaerobic effort - I know this because I used to race and win at it. You wouldn't have. But it is a stupid and irrelevant question because bicarb has no significant effect on how it is raced. But peds do.
So does the 400m, the 1500, the 5000, the 10000... what makes the 800 so unique and why would bicarb help and make it easier?
No one cares about your wins as a kid, and you are probably lying about them anyway. No one has heard of your athletic achievements (lol) outside your school.
As for my results in the 800m, your gaslighting is pathetic. A good reflection of you as a person.
"The 800 combines aerobic with anaerobic effort" is the answer a person who started running this year would give. You are ignorant and you shouldn't even be posting on this thread if you don't know what is so specific about the 800m.
The 800 combines aerobic with anaerobic effort - I know this because I used to race and win at it. You wouldn't have. But it is a stupid and irrelevant question because bicarb has no significant effect on how it is raced. But peds do.
Bicarb > PEDs. This isn't "baking soda" anymore, not once your body can now fullly absorb and utilize it and not have the old downsides.
So bicarb is equivalent to EPO but WADA has no problems with it?
The 800 combines aerobic with anaerobic effort - I know this because I used to race and win at it. You wouldn't have. But it is a stupid and irrelevant question because bicarb has no significant effect on how it is raced. But peds do.
So does the 400m, the 1500, the 5000, the 10000... what makes the 800 so unique and why would bicarb help and make it easier?
No one cares about your wins as a kid, and you are probably lying about them anyway. No one has heard of your athletic achievements (lol) outside your school.
As for my results in the 800m, your gaslighting is pathetic. A good reflection of you as a person.
"The 800 combines aerobic with anaerobic effort" is the answer a person who started running this year would give. You are ignorant and you shouldn't even be posting on this thread if you don't know what is so specific about the 800m.
The 800 is a md event which, as I said, I had experience of racing the distance. It doesn't require Olympic medals to have that experience. The 800 has been a md event since the beginning of the sport. It isn't new. It isn't a sprint and it isn't a distance event. So I suppose that's what makes it "unique". Bicarb however is being used by distance runners and not just 800 runners. Are distance runners too dim to realise it only works for the 800 - or so you appear to claim? And if it is so performance-enhancing over the 800 why is it only now that its effects are being observed? And why is WADA unconcerned? You are full of self important empty waffle, none of which stacks up.
So does the 400m, the 1500, the 5000, the 10000... what makes the 800 so unique and why would bicarb help and make it easier?
No one cares about your wins as a kid, and you are probably lying about them anyway. No one has heard of your athletic achievements (lol) outside your school.
As for my results in the 800m, your gaslighting is pathetic. A good reflection of you as a person.
"The 800 combines aerobic with anaerobic effort" is the answer a person who started running this year would give. You are ignorant and you shouldn't even be posting on this thread if you don't know what is so specific about the 800m.
The 800 is a md event which, as I said, I had experience of racing the distance. It doesn't require Olympic medals to have that experience. The 800 has been a md event since the beginning of the sport. It isn't new. It isn't a sprint and it isn't a distance event. So I suppose that's what makes it "unique". Bicarb however is being used by distance runners and not just 800 runners. Are distance runners too dim to realise it only works for the 800 - or so you appear to claim? And if it is so performance-enhancing over the 800 why is it only now that its effects are being observed? And why is WADA unconcerned? You are full of self important empty waffle, none of which stacks up.
The 800 is a md event which, as I said, I had experience of racing the distance. It doesn't require Olympic medals to have that experience. The 800 has been a md event since the beginning of the sport. It isn't new. It isn't a sprint and it isn't a distance event. So I suppose that's what makes it "unique". Bicarb however is being used by distance runners and not just 800 runners. Are distance runners too dim to realise it only works for the 800 - or so you appear to claim? And if it is so performance-enhancing over the 800 why is it only now that its effects are being observed? And why is WADA unconcerned? You are full of self important empty waffle, none of which stacks up.
So many words, so little content.
You would say that because you can't address any of the points I made: -
1. Bicarb is being used by distance runners and not just 800 runners. Are distance runners too dim to realise it only works for the 800 - or so you appear to claim?
2. And if it is so performance-enhancing over the 800 why is it only now that its effects are being observed?
You would say that because you can't address any of the points I made: -
1. Bicarb is being used by distance runners and not just 800 runners. Are distance runners too dim to realise it only works for the 800 - or so you appear to claim?
2. And if it is so performance-enhancing over the 800 why is it only now that its effects are being observed?
3. And why is WADA unconcerned?
Crickets.
Crickets is what I have been hearing from you for days after I asked you a simple question.
Your second question shows that you really know nothing about the subject.
You would say that because you can't address any of the points I made: -
1. Bicarb is being used by distance runners and not just 800 runners. Are distance runners too dim to realise it only works for the 800 - or so you appear to claim?
2. And if it is so performance-enhancing over the 800 why is it only now that its effects are being observed?
3. And why is WADA unconcerned?
Crickets.
Crickets is what I have been hearing from you for days after I asked you a simple question.
Your second question shows that you really know nothing about the subject.
Evasion. You can't answer any of those questions. So explain what makes the 800 so "unique" and therefore benefitting from bicarb in the way other events don't? Nah - you can't. Pure flannel.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
Crickets is what I have been hearing from you for days after I asked you a simple question.
Your second question shows that you really know nothing about the subject.
Evasion. You can't answer any of those questions. So explain what makes the 800 so "unique" and therefore benefitting from bicarb in the way other events don't? Nah - you can't. Pure flannel.
Evasion? Hahaha Yes, that's the only thing you have. Answer my question and I will answer yours. That's how it works.
And now you ask me the question I asked you. Why? Just admit you have no idea what makes the 800m so unique and why bicarb could make it easier.
Evasion. You can't answer any of those questions. So explain what makes the 800 so "unique" and therefore benefitting from bicarb in the way other events don't? Nah - you can't. Pure flannel.
Evasion? Hahaha Yes, that's the only thing you have. Answer my question and I will answer yours. That's how it works.
And now you ask me the question I asked you. Why? Just admit you have no idea what makes the 800m so unique and why bicarb could make it easier.
You live in a fictional world. Just make stuff up. It isn't "so unique" - it is a classic md race - and bicarb doesn't make it "easier" - runners still run just as hard as without it. Nor does bicarb make it faster - drugs do that.