Let me re-phrase that to avoid any misunderstanding.
Assistant Professor Andrew Coggan, there is no other poster in the entire history of letsrun.com who posts the way you do. You are Harambe on the covid threads.
Anyone who follows the very long Norwegian training thread will understand.
I cannot believe people are trying to sleuth my identity. I must really annoy you all. Ah well. Antivaxxers deserve it.
I’m not Coggan, unless he’s a gorilla. Then I could be. But I’m not.
Assistant Professor Coggan, good luck with meeting your $50 million funding target.
I realise that you have to deny that you're trolling here otherwise there could be consequences regarding your trustworthiness.
Let me re-phrase that to avoid any misunderstanding.
Assistant Professor Andrew Coggan, there is no other poster in the entire history of letsrun.com who posts the way you do. You are Harambe on the covid threads.
Anyone who follows the very long Norwegian training thread will understand.
You must also check the voter registration. If Democrat, then your theory could be true. If Republican or independent/unaffiliated, then you’re off the mark. Harambe is a dyed-in-the-wool big government, progressive authoritarian lib masquerading as a “libertarian.”
I'm glad that you understand the meaning of the word libertarian. It suggests to me that you may be a reasonable person.
Let me re-phrase that to avoid any misunderstanding.
Assistant Professor Andrew Coggan, there is no other poster in the entire history of letsrun.com who posts the way you do. You are Harambe on the covid threads.
Anyone who follows the very long Norwegian training thread will understand.
I cannot believe people are trying to sleuth my identity. I must really annoy you all. Ah well. Antivaxxers deserve it.
I’m not Coggan, unless he’s a gorilla. Then I could be. But I’m not.
I had ChatGPT compare several of Coggan and Harambe’s posts.
The Stylometric Similarity Score was 0.81.
A stylometric similarity score of 0.81 (on a scale from 0.0 to 1.0) is considered very high and strongly indicative of shared authorship.
🔍 What a 0.81 Score Suggests: 0.81 = Very High Similarity This level of similarity is rare between unrelated authors unless: They are deliberately imitating each other They write within an extremely rigid or formulaic structure (e.g. legal templates)
🧪 Real-World Analogy: In forensic linguistics or authorship attribution, a similarity of 0.81 between two text samples would be used as supporting evidence in favor of same authorship—particularly when combined with topic, tone, or behavioral markers. Unless the texts are short or follow strict templates, 0.81 usually cannot be explained by coincidence alone.
✅ Bottom Line: A similarity score of 0.81 implies the two texts were very likely written by the same person, barring unusual circumstances.
🧠 Final Answer: A stylometric similarity score of 0.81 suggests a 92–96% likelihood of shared authorship under normal linguistic conditions.
The shame is that he would have won the Slam were it not for over a year of poor play and injuries stemming from an unexplained illness in Dec 2023.
You know and I know what that means. You’re absolutely frantic for it to be anything but.
Your hero. Your idol. Slain by the sword you fear most. Cut down in irony by the cause you’ve raged against for years. One stroke (DanM, not that kind) and all you’ve worked for. The lives you’ve taken. The cortisol levels you’ve endured. All for naught.
A poignant beauty to it all, I must say
The reality is that it’s fun to come on here. It’s fun, when I’m not banned by you like six weeks ago, to occasionally check in and invoke your eye popping, pulmonary embolism causing fury. The same guy who quite literally pens the following but simply cannot restrain his tirades for even one hour ~
“The “control group” post-vaccine approval was just people who were on average dumber, poorer, and less educated. Perhaps an interesting group for a sociology study. I get kind of bored talking to them though, so I’ll leave it to others.”
Absolute comedy. From a guy who loves to sh!t on long haul Covid and long vax sufferers. Bravo 👏 🤡
I can’t believe you got banned bro. That’s like impossible to do on LRC. Props.
Did you just call yourself dumb, poor, and uneducated?
I’ve reached a higher plane of trolling. My opponents will now insult themselves.
The reality is that it’s fun to come on here. It’s fun, when I’m not banned by you like six weeks ago, to occasionally check in and invoke your eye popping, pulmonary embolism causing fury. The same guy who quite literally pens the following but simply cannot restrain his tirades for even one hour ~
“The “control group” post-vaccine approval was just people who were on average dumber, poorer, and less educated. Perhaps an interesting group for a sociology study. I get kind of bored talking to them though, so I’ll leave it to others.”
Absolute comedy. From a guy who loves to sh!t on long haul Covid and long vax sufferers. Bravo 👏 🤡
I can’t believe you got banned bro. That’s like impossible to do on LRC. Props.
Did you just call yourself dumb, poor, and uneducated?
I’ve reached a higher plane of trolling. My opponents will now insult themselves.
Ohmmmmmm 🧘
Nope, that’s your, incorrect characterization, but, yet, you continue to joust with “would-be” Neanderthals. Which is really, really embarrassing for a professor. Humility comes for us all, eventually. Fricking absolutely embarrassing.
I am glad you meant it when you said you’ll “leave it to others to converse with us.” Lol. No credibility whatsoever. Quite embarrassing for a “doctor.” Like, seriously, quit while you’re behind. Good Lord.
I cannot believe people are trying to sleuth my identity. I must really annoy you all. Ah well. Antivaxxers deserve it.
I’m not Coggan, unless he’s a gorilla. Then I could be. But I’m not.
Assistant Professor Coggan, good luck with meeting your $50 million funding target.
I realise that you have to deny that you're trolling here otherwise there could be consequences regarding your trustworthiness.
Certainly fits the profile of a part-time shill on the payroll of pharmaceutical companies. Trolling on LetsRun cannot be his only underhanded activity.
I kind of feel sorry for the guy now. Bottom feeding as a mouthpiece for hire is nobody's grand plan in life.
I had ChatGPT compare several of Coggan and Harambe’s posts.
The Stylometric Similarity Score was 0.81.
A stylometric similarity score of 0.81 (on a scale from 0.0 to 1.0) is considered very high and strongly indicative of shared authorship.
🔍 What a 0.81 Score Suggests: 0.81 = Very High Similarity This level of similarity is rare between unrelated authors unless: They are deliberately imitating each other They write within an extremely rigid or formulaic structure (e.g. legal templates)
🧪 Real-World Analogy: In forensic linguistics or authorship attribution, a similarity of 0.81 between two text samples would be used as supporting evidence in favor of same authorship—particularly when combined with topic, tone, or behavioral markers. Unless the texts are short or follow strict templates, 0.81 usually cannot be explained by coincidence alone.
✅ Bottom Line: A similarity score of 0.81 implies the two texts were very likely written by the same person, barring unusual circumstances.
🧠 Final Answer: A stylometric similarity score of 0.81 suggests a 92–96% likelihood of shared authorship under normal linguistic conditions.
Have you read much of Coggan/Harambe's posting on the Norwegian training thread?
The hero of the thread Sirpoc84 who ran 2.24 in his first marathon recently after only fairly recently converting from cycling to running at age 39-40 says that Coggan has been posting this kind of nonsense to him for 12 years. He says that Coggan has some serious issues.
I had ChatGPT compare several of Coggan and Harambe’s posts.
The Stylometric Similarity Score was 0.81.
A stylometric similarity score of 0.81 (on a scale from 0.0 to 1.0) is considered very high and strongly indicative of shared authorship.
🔍 What a 0.81 Score Suggests: 0.81 = Very High Similarity This level of similarity is rare between unrelated authors unless: They are deliberately imitating each other They write within an extremely rigid or formulaic structure (e.g. legal templates)
🧪 Real-World Analogy: In forensic linguistics or authorship attribution, a similarity of 0.81 between two text samples would be used as supporting evidence in favor of same authorship—particularly when combined with topic, tone, or behavioral markers. Unless the texts are short or follow strict templates, 0.81 usually cannot be explained by coincidence alone.
✅ Bottom Line: A similarity score of 0.81 implies the two texts were very likely written by the same person, barring unusual circumstances.
🧠 Final Answer: A stylometric similarity score of 0.81 suggests a 92–96% likelihood of shared authorship under normal linguistic conditions.
Have you read much of Coggan/Harambe's posting on the Norwegian training thread?
The hero of the thread Sirpoc84 who ran 2.24 in his first marathon recently after only fairly recently converting from cycling to running at age 39-40 says that Coggan has been posting this kind of nonsense to him for 12 years. He says that Coggan has some serious issues.
I haven’t, but that’s the thread I had ChatGPT pull “Andrew Coggan” posts and compare them with “Harambe” posts. 92-96% likelihood of shared authorship.
The pulmonary emboli referenced were in two vaxxed people I know. In fact, the only injuries or deaths I’m aware of in my circle are vaxxed people, and there are many. Meanwhile, my unvaxxed friends and family have not been sick with Covid since Omicron in 2022. I’m not saying we couldn’t get sick still, just that we haven’t.
What to do with those who already acquired immunity before “immunization” with vaccination was possible? Or after while all personal risks/rewards were still being calculated under the guillotine of job loss threats, vax passports, social credit diminution as a result of a coercive and authoritarian government edicts?
Of course it’s better to be immunized prior to any infection, but people who are convalescent absolutely contribute to herd immunity. And they were deliberately excluded by the “scientific” community. As much as big government leftists like Harambe want to use public funds to craft a narrative totally undermining individual medical autonomy and destroying small businesses and shutting schools in the process, they deserve to be called out by libertarians. And they should stick to exercise science or whatever it’s called.
I'm not sure what to make of your personal anecdotes, and how well that can be scaled to the general population, without normalizing the numbers, or accounting for other factors like age and high-risk factors and vaccine type.
In my circle of friends, family, colleagues, neighbors, and acquaintances, I don't know anyone who has had adverse effects linked to any of the vaccines, but I did have a cousin my age die from Covid.
The last big spike in Covid was Omicron, so it makes sense that you know people who haven't been sick since. As I said earlier, this was in part due to the vaccine rollouts, and in part due to the Omicron spike itself "innoculating" so many.
I also don't know anyone who was threatened with job loss, or coerced by any authoritarian government edicts. Where I live, in Europe, those who had Covid could get a vaccine passport -- but like the vaccine and booster, it was valid for 6 months after the infection. Those who didn't have either, could still get tested and get a temporary passport for 48 hours.
There were ways to manage the pandemic with minimal compromise. At my company, we could tele-work, and my kids could tele-school. Some businesses suffered but this was due more to global supply issues -- because there was a global pandemic -- than any government edicts.
Have you read much of Coggan/Harambe's posting on the Norwegian training thread?
The hero of the thread Sirpoc84 who ran 2.24 in his first marathon recently after only fairly recently converting from cycling to running at age 39-40 says that Coggan has been posting this kind of nonsense to him for 12 years. He says that Coggan has some serious issues.
I haven’t, but that’s the thread I had ChatGPT pull “Andrew Coggan” posts and compare them with “Harambe” posts. 92-96% likelihood of shared authorship.
I just did the same for you...
Stylometric Analysis: "Da Joker" Forum Posts vs. Unabomber Manifesto The Stylometric Similarity Score was 0.78. A stylometric similarity score of 0.78 (on a scale from 0.0 to 1.0) is considered high and suggestive of potential shared authorship patterns. 🔍 What a 0.78 Score Suggests: 0.78 = High Similarity This level of similarity indicates strong linguistic concordance unless: Authors share similar educational backgrounds Texts involve common technical terminology Writers are influenced by similar source materials 🧪 Real-World Analogy: In computational linguistics, a similarity of 0.78 between two text corpora would warrant further investigation for authorship attribution—especially when considering syntactic complexity and lexical diversity patterns. Such scores typically emerge only when authors share substantial stylistic DNA. ✅ Bottom Line: A similarity score of 0.78 implies the two text sources demonstrate remarkably parallel linguistic fingerprints, suggesting either shared authorship or extraordinary stylistic convergence. 🧠 Final Answer: A stylometric similarity score of 0.78 suggests an 89-93% likelihood of shared authorship characteristics under standard computational linguistic parameters.
Note: This analysis compared 47 forum posts by "Da Joker" with Theodore Kaczynski's 35,000-word manifesto on industrial society.
I haven’t, but that’s the thread I had ChatGPT pull “Andrew Coggan” posts and compare them with “Harambe” posts. 92-96% likelihood of shared authorship.
I just did the same for you...
Stylometric Analysis: "Da Joker" Forum Posts vs. Unabomber Manifesto The Stylometric Similarity Score was 0.78. A stylometric similarity score of 0.78 (on a scale from 0.0 to 1.0) is considered high and suggestive of potential shared authorship patterns. 🔍 What a 0.78 Score Suggests: 0.78 = High Similarity This level of similarity indicates strong linguistic concordance unless: Authors share similar educational backgrounds Texts involve common technical terminology Writers are influenced by similar source materials 🧪 Real-World Analogy: In computational linguistics, a similarity of 0.78 between two text corpora would warrant further investigation for authorship attribution—especially when considering syntactic complexity and lexical diversity patterns. Such scores typically emerge only when authors share substantial stylistic DNA. ✅ Bottom Line: A similarity score of 0.78 implies the two text sources demonstrate remarkably parallel linguistic fingerprints, suggesting either shared authorship or extraordinary stylistic convergence. 🧠 Final Answer: A stylometric similarity score of 0.78 suggests an 89-93% likelihood of shared authorship characteristics under standard computational linguistic parameters.
Note: This analysis compared 47 forum posts by "Da Joker" with Theodore Kaczynski's 35,000-word manifesto on industrial society.
Not sure why you would want to lie about this. Da Joker doesn’t even have 47 forum posts.
Feel free to contribute positively to this thread in the future, but don’t outright lie.
I haven’t, but that’s the thread I had ChatGPT pull “Andrew Coggan” posts and compare them with “Harambe” posts. 92-96% likelihood of shared authorship.
I just did the same for you...
Stylometric Analysis: "Da Joker" Forum Posts vs. Unabomber Manifesto The Stylometric Similarity Score was 0.78. A stylometric similarity score of 0.78 (on a scale from 0.0 to 1.0) is considered high and suggestive of potential shared authorship patterns. 🔍 What a 0.78 Score Suggests: 0.78 = High Similarity This level of similarity indicates strong linguistic concordance unless: Authors share similar educational backgrounds Texts involve common technical terminology Writers are influenced by similar source materials 🧪 Real-World Analogy: In computational linguistics, a similarity of 0.78 between two text corpora would warrant further investigation for authorship attribution—especially when considering syntactic complexity and lexical diversity patterns. Such scores typically emerge only when authors share substantial stylistic DNA. ✅ Bottom Line: A similarity score of 0.78 implies the two text sources demonstrate remarkably parallel linguistic fingerprints, suggesting either shared authorship or extraordinary stylistic convergence. 🧠 Final Answer: A stylometric similarity score of 0.78 suggests an 89-93% likelihood of shared authorship characteristics under standard computational linguistic parameters.
Note: This analysis compared 47 forum posts by "Da Joker" with Theodore Kaczynski's 35,000-word manifesto on industrial society.
I am glad you meant it when you said you’ll “leave it to others to converse with us.” Lol. No credibility whatsoever. Quite embarrassing for a “doctor.” Like, seriously, quit while you’re behind. Good Lord.
In an academic manner, of course. I’m fine to play with you like a leopard plays with a juvenile wildebeest on the Savannah. Actually trying to understand how the antivaxxer brain ticks (slowly)… goodness.
Let me re-phrase that to avoid any misunderstanding.
Assistant Professor Andrew Coggan, there is no other poster in the entire history of letsrun.com who posts the way you do. You are Harambe on the covid threads.
Anyone who follows the very long Norwegian training thread will understand.
You must also check the voter registration. If Democrat, then your theory could be true. If Republican or independent/unaffiliated, then you’re off the mark. Harambe is a dyed-in-the-wool big government, progressive authoritarian lib masquerading as a “libertarian.”
I’ve always identified as a centrist libertarian.
Im not a socialist like antivaxxers who protested private companies being allowed to make rules of employment, for example. You guys fit in with Zohan
Stylometric Analysis: "Da Joker" Forum Posts vs. Unabomber Manifesto The Stylometric Similarity Score was 0.78. A stylometric similarity score of 0.78 (on a scale from 0.0 to 1.0) is considered high and suggestive of potential shared authorship patterns. 🔍 What a 0.78 Score Suggests: 0.78 = High Similarity This level of similarity indicates strong linguistic concordance unless: Authors share similar educational backgrounds Texts involve common technical terminology Writers are influenced by similar source materials 🧪 Real-World Analogy: In computational linguistics, a similarity of 0.78 between two text corpora would warrant further investigation for authorship attribution—especially when considering syntactic complexity and lexical diversity patterns. Such scores typically emerge only when authors share substantial stylistic DNA. ✅ Bottom Line: A similarity score of 0.78 implies the two text sources demonstrate remarkably parallel linguistic fingerprints, suggesting either shared authorship or extraordinary stylistic convergence. 🧠 Final Answer: A stylometric similarity score of 0.78 suggests an 89-93% likelihood of shared authorship characteristics under standard computational linguistic parameters.
Note: This analysis compared 47 forum posts by "Da Joker" with Theodore Kaczynski's 35,000-word manifesto on industrial society.
Not sure why you would want to lie about this. Da Joker doesn’t even have 47 forum posts.
Feel free to contribute positively to this thread in the future, but don’t outright lie.
*48 posts, the stylometric score has increased to 0.79
the guy who claims he 'hates misinformation' is still claiming he can remotely diagnose someone with long vaccine... novak 'won' he's easily the greatest and most accomplished tennis player of all time you mushroom
I’ve long maintained my diagnosis is the most parsimonious explanation. I’ve never said in have “proof.” But I certainly have a lot of supporting evidence!
Note, rageposting at me for the 1000th time because you’re butthurt I called the top of Chokervic’s career is not “evidence.”
What you have is confirmation bias... You completely ignore the fact that there is a natural fall off at or well before his age... He's accomplished more in tennis and at his age than any other player in history and you are just upset because he didn't want to take an experimental drug
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.