The wet nurse/milk maid comment back on page 2 or 3 was spot on. Women have been having babies for years/centuries and letting others raise the kids. What difference is it if it in the womb/newborn/preschool age? No matter how one looks at it, the "village" has shifted.
My wife and I spent years attempting to have children and finally went in a different direction to become parents and then were fortunate enough to have two children born in a "standard" fashion. We did not use surrogacy for our oldest.
The comments in this thread by those criticizing Coburn are beyond pathetic.
I see all the lonely misogynists posting on yesterday's now deleted thread (on the same topic) are back in full force! What a cesspool this place has become.
We can ask a moral question without being a cesspool. I am a woman with a PhD and not some random idiot. Which I already have been called on this thread. Stop it. Not every discussion you dislike is a forbidden one.
Well, let's just say that they are lucky they lives in Colorado and not Flagstaff, because surrogacy contracts are illegal in Arizona and thus they would not actually be the parents unless they went through the process of legal adoption.
The wet nurse/milk maid comment back on page 2 or 3 was spot on. Women have been having babies for years/centuries and letting others raise the kids. What difference is it if it in the womb/newborn/preschool age? No matter how one looks at it, the "village" has shifted.
As a female and judging by the few comment’s Emma has made or been commented by close friends , “waited a lifetime for you”, Kara’s comment “you’ve waited soooo long and she was worth the wait”.. both these comments lead me to believe this has been a long and trying process for Emma and Joe- meaning, they’ve been trying for a kid for years but it wasn’t in the cards the traditional way.. glad to see it worked out for them.
100%
If you’ve ever interacted with a woman who trusts you enough to be open about her struggles, this isn’t even reading between the lines, it’s bold highlight and underline top of the page.
As a woman, it is heartbreaking to read these comments, which I assume are mainly coming from men who have no idea what it is to go through a pregnancy. Or to have miscarriages, fertility issues, pump your body full of hormones for the gamble of IVF treatment, life threatening health issues during pregnancy, etc.
Motherhood comes in many forms and all are valid. So politely, I would ask anyone without a uterus (negatively judging Emma) to STFU and mind your own business. Congrats on becoming a mom, Emma !
Just this morning, I was thinking about the differences between feminism a decade or two ago and feminism today. One major theme is this: people today seem to think that feminism or women's rights movements are all about compassion. Don't judge! Be nice! Shame on you! This extends to other social justice movements, as well.
But prior rights movements were based on principles like equal treatment before the law, fairness, etc., not on emotional appeals. Runnerchick's comments are aligned with this tradition and were clearly articulated in a rational and diplomatic way.
What we're seeing today under the guise of women's rights are constant emotional appeals and threats of public shaming through ad hominem attacks. These tactics are known in scientific literature as "female relational aggression" (read: Mean Girls), and they are being used to keep people in line with a set of feminine social norms (compassion, empathy, caretaking). These norms are productive in society, but they are not sufficient in and of themselves.
Social norms are reliant on judgement, rather than boundless acceptance of absolutely everything. Discussions about the ethics of surrogacy may be upsetting for people who have personal experience with surrogacy, but this should not make them out-of-bounds.
The fact is that many people have ethical reservations about surrogacy. We can suppress this discussion, but we're really just insulating people from the real world when we do so. It's like the South Park episode where the principal has somebody filter out negative comments on Cartman's social media because he was upset about them. I'm not in favor of posting surrogacy-critical comments on Emma Coburn's social media, but the suggestion that nobody should talk about it in any forum at all is ridiculous.
In reference to the part about men weighing in on this topic: my response is that it depends on what exactly they're saying. If they're talking about the experience of pregnancy or being an embodied woman, then it's fair to say they don't know what they're talking about. The question is: are they talking about externally-verifiable knowledge or the embodied experience of being a woman? Moral and ethical discussions about pregnancy, abortion, or surrogacy should not be foreclosed to men.
I'll note as an aside that many of the same people telling men to shut up about these issues will just as quickly tell you that trans women are women in precisely the same way that they are. Why? Because the logic of this ideology is to elevate compassion, empathy (but only for certified victims), and non-judgmentalism above all else.
As a woman who cares about women's rights, I don't have to shut up and be nice if I think there's something to discuss. Elevating compassion above all else is not feminist. In fact, it feels downright regressive.
The trigger here for so many was the video itself.
In the video you see Emma and Joe dressed nicely as a newborn baby is pushed towards them by someone you don't see. Emma scoops up her baby as though it was a fresh delivery of flowers. The optics of the video do make it seem like Emma "purchased" her baby. We don't see the surrogate, and because Emma did not have the baby, we don't see her exhausted in the hospital, but rather dressed in jeans and a sweater. The video makes it look like a baby was cooked up just for her and she paid for it because she had the money to do so.
The video is misleading. It doesn't cover private details that are absolutely none of our business. Surrogacy IS a deeply complex process. Everyone's journey to parenthood (should they choose that journey) is their own. Some adopt, some have natural babies, some choose surrogacy. We have no idea what hardship or heartbreak Emma and Joe endured to get here.
Before commenting, try to consider Emma and Joe's announcement on it's own without the video and see what you think about it. I bet you'd be a lot less judgmental.
That was incredibly disturbing to watch. It's like she walked into a surprise birthday party. I was there when my wife gave birth 3 times. It's not like that.
That was incredibly disturbing to watch. It's like she walked into a surprise birthday party. I was there when my wife gave birth 3 times. It's not like that.
Yes, this. It's as if people have picked up on the performative nature of a social media reel and transferred that ick to the process behind the scenes. It's not fair, though also not exactly unnatural.
The trigger here for so many was the video itself.
In the video you see Emma and Joe dressed nicely as a newborn baby is pushed towards them by someone you don't see. Emma scoops up her baby as though it was a fresh delivery of flowers. The optics of the video do make it seem like Emma "purchased" her baby. We don't see the surrogate, and because Emma did not have the baby, we don't see her exhausted in the hospital, but rather dressed in jeans and a sweater. The video makes it look like a baby was cooked up just for her and she paid for it because she had the money to do so.
The video is misleading. It doesn't cover private details that are absolutely none of our business. Surrogacy IS a deeply complex process. Everyone's journey to parenthood (should they choose that journey) is their own. Some adopt, some have natural babies, some choose surrogacy. We have no idea what hardship or heartbreak Emma and Joe endured to get here.
Before commenting, try to consider Emma and Joe's announcement on it's own without the video and see what you think about it. I bet you'd be a lot less judgmental.
I agree. The video was not great. What you wouldn’t see is if they used her egg, the painful process of extracting the eggs from her, the hormone shots, etc. One wonders how that part of the process affected her training.
Regardless, congrats to them. In a country where people are bemoaning the declining birth rates, here’s a couple ready to raise a child.
The trigger here for so many was the video itself.
In the video you see Emma and Joe dressed nicely as a newborn baby is pushed towards them by someone you don't see. Emma scoops up her baby as though it was a fresh delivery of flowers. The optics of the video do make it seem like Emma "purchased" her baby. We don't see the surrogate, and because Emma did not have the baby, we don't see her exhausted in the hospital, but rather dressed in jeans and a sweater. The video makes it look like a baby was cooked up just for her and she paid for it because she had the money to do so.
The video is misleading. It doesn't cover private details that are absolutely none of our business. Surrogacy IS a deeply complex process. Everyone's journey to parenthood (should they choose that journey) is their own. Some adopt, some have natural babies, some choose surrogacy. We have no idea what hardship or heartbreak Emma and Joe endured to get here.
Before commenting, try to consider Emma and Joe's announcement on it's own without the video and see what you think about it. I bet you'd be a lot less judgmental.
I am not being "judgmental" towards Emma. I'm talking about judgement as discernment and evaluation. My entire post is about moral and ethical discussions and distinguishing this from emotional gut reactions as much as possible. I have not weighed in on Emma at all or leveled any negative moral judgements against her or Joe.
The trigger here for so many was the video itself.
In the video you see Emma and Joe dressed nicely as a newborn baby is pushed towards them by someone you don't see. Emma scoops up her baby as though it was a fresh delivery of flowers. The optics of the video do make it seem like Emma "purchased" her baby. We don't see the surrogate, and because Emma did not have the baby, we don't see her exhausted in the hospital, but rather dressed in jeans and a sweater. The video makes it look like a baby was cooked up just for her and she paid for it because she had the money to do so.
The video is misleading. It doesn't cover private details that are absolutely none of our business. Surrogacy IS a deeply complex process. Everyone's journey to parenthood (should they choose that journey) is their own. Some adopt, some have natural babies, some choose surrogacy. We have no idea what hardship or heartbreak Emma and Joe endured to get here.
Before commenting, try to consider Emma and Joe's announcement on it's own without the video and see what you think about it. I bet you'd be a lot less judgmental.
I am not being "judgmental" towards Emma. I'm talking about judgement as discernment and evaluation. My entire post is about moral and ethical discussions and distinguishing this from emotional gut reactions as much as possible. I have not weighed in on Emma at all or leveled any negative moral judgements against her or Joe.
I see the downvotes on my recent posts, but I haven't seen anbody discuss the substantive content of my arguments. Judgement is not judgementalism.
The truth is that I thought the video was sweet, and I really like Emma. However, I'm capable of having this emotional reaction to Emma in particular and of thinking through the ethics of surrogacy in general.
That was incredibly disturbing to watch. It's like she walked into a surprise birthday party. I was there when my wife gave birth 3 times. It's not like that.
I completely disagree. I am a mother who has given birth via c-section. I thought her video was beautiful. When I watched Emma's tears as she held her daughter, it brought me back to that exact moment when I met my daughter for the first time. It was a feeling of happiness that was so full and deep. A love that is impossible to describe with words. The video was beautiful, and I think it's wonderful that they were able to capture that moment.
All of the people, especially the men, who are so judgmental, need to take a step back and reflect on themselves.
I am not being "judgmental" towards Emma. I'm talking about judgement as discernment and evaluation. My entire post is about moral and ethical discussions and distinguishing this from emotional gut reactions as much as possible. I have not weighed in on Emma at all or leveled any negative moral judgements against her or Joe.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.