"For some weird reason, you are unable to distinguish between people and their ideas. Maybe this is why you regularly attack people on this site? You should really learn the difference between criticizing ideas vs attacking people."
I don't need to learn anything from you. Your ideas show who you are. When you keep relentlessly promoting them when no others here accept them you will earn the label you do.
By refusing to accept a reasonable request to cease making personal attacks, you’ve shown who you are.
What you think of me doesn't bother me at all. But I do find it rich that you think the rubbish you spout deserves respect.
Thanks. My apologies, I believe I previously acknowledged your point about her having the option to have her ban reduced to 3 years by admitting guilt, but maybe that was in another thread (there’s a whole other thread about that point specifically). My stance on that point is she shouldn’t have been forced to make that choice. If she truly believes in the depths of her heart that she is innocent and she truly doesn’t know how/why she tested positive, then she shouldn’t have to make a false confession to avoid the cruel and unusual punishment of missing two Olympics.
You know what. She did a lie detector test with her lawyer, and they never asked the question, Did you intentionally dope? Pretty much her whole "defense " was bull$h!t
That is only a coincidence! They only had four months to prepare!! Just like it's a coincidence that the hair analysis wasn't done for DHEA. Does no one listen to Chief Rekrunner??
What you think of me doesn't bother me at all. But I do find it rich that you think the rubbish you spout deserves respect.
Again, you fail to distinguish between ideas (what you perceive to be rubbish) and people.
You clearly care what I think because you’ve taken the time to respond to just about every comment I’ve made, even comments I made to other people.
Of course you can't follow what I say. I said I don't care what you think of me. What I care about is the endless doping apologism from you and those who think like you. The most "elegant solution" would be for you to give up arguing softer treatment for Houlihan and the reduction of her ban.
Of course you can't follow what I say. I said I don't care what you think of me. What I care about is the endless doping apologism from you and those who think like you. The most "elegant solution" would be for you to give up arguing softer treatment for Houlihan and the reduction of her ban.
I was hoping you’d catch that. Now you know how it feels to have your words twisted against you. Speaking of which: find me the post where I supposedly argued that Shelby’s ban should be reduced. Quote my exact words.
Actually, my proposal got a decent number of likes. So you are wrong. Again. It must be tiring for you to be wrong so often.
You're the Olympic champion for that. No one on this thread accepts your "elegant proposal". (How about "misplaced and ham-fisted"?)
You keep repeating points I’ve already refuted. Very strange. Do you have memory issues? If nobody accepts my elegant proposal, then why did people like it? Riddle me that!
Of course you can't follow what I say. I said I don't care what you think of me. What I care about is the endless doping apologism from you and those who think like you. The most "elegant solution" would be for you to give up arguing softer treatment for Houlihan and the reduction of her ban.
I was hoping you’d catch that. Now you know how it feels to have your words twisted against you. Speaking of which: find me the post where I supposedly argued that Shelby’s ban should be reduced. Quote my exact words.
You're the Olympic champion for that. No one on this thread accepts your "elegant proposal". (How about "misplaced and ham-fisted"?)
You keep repeating points I’ve already refuted. Very strange. Do you have memory issues? If nobody accepts my elegant proposal, then why did people like it? Riddle me that!
The riddle is that no one has posted a comment endorsing what you have proposed, yet you keep arguing it.
What I enjoy the most about these threads is that no matter how much wind is expended here by Houlihan's fans and doping apologists (many of them are the same) nothing they say changes the outcome of the CAS decision. We can sleep easily in our beds.
You keep repeating points I’ve already refuted. Very strange. Do you have memory issues? If nobody accepts my elegant proposal, then why did people like it? Riddle me that!
The riddle is that no one has posted a comment endorsing what you have proposed, yet you keep arguing it.
I was hoping you’d catch that. Now you know how it feels to have your words twisted against you. Speaking of which: find me the post where I supposedly argued that Shelby’s ban should be reduced. Quote my exact words.
"Let Shelby compete".
Yet another failure on your part. I didn’t argue her ban should be reduced. I proposed she finish her suspension next year.
That is only a coincidence! They only had four months to prepare!! Just like it's a coincidence that the hair analysis wasn't done for DHEA. Does no one listen to Chief Rekrunner??
I think you mean 19 nor-DHEA which converts to nandrolonoe metabolites.
DHEA converts to DHEA sulfate & can be detected by the carbon isotope ratio test (CIR)..
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.