Reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Read again. I was on the data analysis team in addition to later working with marketing and then other teams. That’s generally how internships work - especially when you are there 18 months.
The number you are looking for is 3.3/100,000 adverse outcomes of Covid positive (0 deaths). That is the number for my demo. Granted, the number was slightly higher when the vaccine was initially available for me. (This was regional data, not state data).
Don't bother arguing. Harambe tries to act like the vax-wizard, yet doesn't know the difference between sample and population probabilities.
I understand using the best available data to make a decision. You can always hide behind “the (sub)population risk is stratified along variable X!!!11” all the way down to a single person
This is, of course, asinine and useless but it’s a great way to avoid having to admit the vaccine is recommended for you — which would be devastating for “quantitative” (lol) thinkers like yourself.
My spike protein-laden brain operates from a place of pure ego and confirmation bias. Anything that challenges my intractable beliefs is immediately rejected by my cognitive fortress of defense mechanisms.
I am a diminutive man.
interesting... and how many injections has this one had?
My spike protein-laden brain operates from a place of pure ego and confirmation bias. Anything that challenges my intractable beliefs is immediately rejected by my cognitive fortress of defense mechanisms.
I am a diminutive man.
interesting... and how many injections has this one had?
Enough to avoid risk of lifelong autoimmune problems from COVID
Don't bother arguing. Harambe tries to act like the vax-wizard, yet doesn't know the difference between sample and population probabilities.
I understand using the best available data to make a decision. You can always hide behind “the (sub)population risk is stratified along variable X!!!11” all the way down to a single person
This is, of course, asinine and useless but it’s a great way to avoid having to admit the vaccine is recommended for you — which would be devastating for “quantitative” (lol) thinkers like yourself.
I never got the vax, and I'm 27 with 0 chronic health issues. Got the original strain in 2020 and then omicron January last year. Got over both in 3 days without any complications. I think I'll use common sense on this one and rely on my natural immunity without worrying about the 1/10,000 or whatever statistically insignificant risk I have of getting some health complication from covid.
I understand using the best available data to make a decision. You can always hide behind “the (sub)population risk is stratified along variable X!!!11” all the way down to a single person
This is, of course, asinine and useless but it’s a great way to avoid having to admit the vaccine is recommended for you — which would be devastating for “quantitative” (lol) thinkers like yourself.
I never got the vax, and I'm 27 with 0 chronic health issues. Got the original strain in 2020 and then omicron January last year. Got over both in 3 days without any complications. I think I'll use common sense on this one and rely on my natural immunity without worrying about the 1/10,000 or whatever statistically insignificant risk I have of getting some health complication from covid.
Known short, medium, and long term risks of an unvaccinated COVID infection
vs.
Hypothetical and totally unsubstantiated risks from the vaccine
The choice is obvious but, hey, no going back for you guys. Die is cast.
Looks like the people have spoken. Well, 84 percent of them anyway.
Covid Boosters Sour for Pfizer, Moderna With Uptake Rate at 16% Seven of 13 experts surveyed see no improvement in rates Pfizer and Moderna have billions riding on booster demand
Known short, medium, and long term risks of an unvaccinated COVID infection
vs.
Hypothetical and totally unsubstantiated risks from the vaccine
The choice is obvious but, hey, no going back for you guys. Die is cast.
Looks like the people have spoken. Well, 84 percent of them anyway.
Covid Boosters Sour for Pfizer, Moderna With Uptake Rate at 16% Seven of 13 experts surveyed see no improvement in rates Pfizer and Moderna have billions riding on booster demand
Nice straw man. I’ve never made the comparison between my risk of adverse outcome to Covid to adverse risk to Covid vaccinations. I never worked with the risk of vaccine data, just Covid data. My guess is that it is near zero - same as my risk of Covid.
I eagerly await your next straw man. 👍
You seem to be unable to understand that dividing two small numbers can result in a large number.
this is called a “ratio” and I guess they don’t teach it in marketing classes
I love how you keep calling me the “marketing guy” like that’s some kind of insult.
I’ll admit I went into it as a data nerd, but there was something fulfilling about working on the data analysis, developing a plan based on that analysis and then implementing that plan in the real world.
A long post with no numbers. Whatever your internship was, you stayed far from the actual data (makes sense – marketing).
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Read again. I was on the data analysis team in addition to later working with marketing and then other teams. That’s generally how internships work - especially when you are there 18 months.
The number you are looking for is 3.3/100,000 adverse outcomes of Covid positive (0 deaths). That is the number for my demo. Granted, the number was slightly higher when the vaccine was initially available for me. (This was regional data, not state data).
What region/state, what is the criteria for "adverse outcome", and is this data or some data product publicly available?
You seem to be unable to understand that dividing two small numbers can result in a large number.
this is called a “ratio” and I guess they don’t teach it in marketing classes
I love how you keep calling me the “marketing guy” like that’s some kind of insult.
I’ll admit I went into it as a data nerd, but there was something fulfilling about working on the data analysis, developing a plan based on that analysis and then implementing that plan in the real world.
Data nerd that can’t show sources or even define what his argument is? Checks out. Really you don’t seem to have a point anymore, other than: “I didn’t get vaccinated, therefore it’s ok.” N=1 data…
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Read again. I was on the data analysis team in addition to later working with marketing and then other teams. That’s generally how internships work - especially when you are there 18 months.
The number you are looking for is 3.3/100,000 adverse outcomes of Covid positive (0 deaths). That is the number for my demo. Granted, the number was slightly higher when the vaccine was initially available for me. (This was regional data, not state data).
What region/state, what is the criteria for "adverse outcome", and is this data or some data product publicly available?
I love how you keep calling me the “marketing guy” like that’s some kind of insult.
I’ll admit I went into it as a data nerd, but there was something fulfilling about working on the data analysis, developing a plan based on that analysis and then implementing that plan in the real world.
Data nerd that can’t show sources or even define what his argument is? Checks out. Really you don’t seem to have a point anymore, other than: “I didn’t get vaccinated, therefore it’s ok.” N=1 data…
Hey look. Boomer figured the quote function out. Great job! 👍 Tell the truth now. Did the grandkids help you out?
Tell me if you disagree with the data I presented?
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Read again. I was on the data analysis team in addition to later working with marketing and then other teams. That’s generally how internships work - especially when you are there 18 months.
The number you are looking for is 3.3/100,000 adverse outcomes of Covid positive (0 deaths). That is the number for my demo. Granted, the number was slightly higher when the vaccine was initially available for me. (This was regional data, not state data).
What region/state, what is the criteria for "adverse outcome", and is this data or some data product publicly available?
The data is available in aggregate of course. The data points the CDC wanted (which was not as robust as our state data) was sent on a daily basis. The data on my sub demo is not publicly available anywhere to my knowledge. Similar research was published on demo risk and risk factors though. Significant amount of data(but not all that was collected) is still publicly available on the PH website. The level of detail is granular though. Data like that is likely where a couple of these posters get their information (or from the 24hour cable shows). If the vaccination campaign we developed came from the granular data, our campaign would have had to be more of a shot gun approach and would not have been as effective as it was. We had better outcomes than most states.
What region/state, what is the criteria for "adverse outcome", and is this data or some data product publicly available?
The data is available in aggregate of course. The data points the CDC wanted (which was not as robust as our state data) was sent on a daily basis. The data on my sub demo is not publicly available anywhere to my knowledge. Similar research was published on demo risk and risk factors though. Significant amount of data(but not all that was collected) is still publicly available on the PH website. The level of detail is granular though. Data like that is likely where a couple of these posters get their information (or from the 24hour cable shows). If the vaccination campaign we developed came from the granular data, our campaign would have had to be more of a shot gun approach and would not have been as effective as it was. We had better outcomes than most states.
Come on man. I think it’s valuable that you had this learning experience and finally got to feel agency/expert status. But this kind of dialogue isn’t useful. If you’re going to throw out numbers to just your point (which you still won’t clarify what it even is) you need to source those! Please!
A few of us have been slicing and dicing COVID numbers and studies for 3 years now. We like this stuff! don’t be shy.
Data nerd that can’t show sources or even define what his argument is? Checks out. Really you don’t seem to have a point anymore, other than: “I didn’t get vaccinated, therefore it’s ok.” N=1 data…
Hey look. Boomer figured the quote function out. Great job! 👍 Tell the truth now. Did the grandkids help you out?
Tell me if you disagree with the data I presented?
I’ll patiently wait for your next straw man.
Asking you what your argument is… is not a straw man.
Humor me. I am too old/stupid etc to get your thesis here :) whatever you wanna hear!
Based on the data point you provided. You think not getting vaccinated is the correct choice? Yes?
