”It doesn’t add up.. does this mean his autobiography needs to be moved to fiction ? What about 5 siblings, parents & grandparents who are called ‘Farah’? What about documentary he did 2 months ago with totally different narrative? Why now?”
Id love to give him the benefit of the doubt given the serious matter; but this man/woman brings up some very valid points. He has a pretty significant history of lying, which clouds the matter even more.
In this politically correct world we live in - we are supposed to feel sorry for Hussein Abdi Kahin (aka Mohamed Farah).
Sorry, I will not.
People go illegally to other countries every day. By doing so they are criminals. They have engaged in illegal immigration.
Then later some of them work - another crime called 'unauthorized employment'.
Those that work do not pay taxes on their income - which is another crime called 'tax evasion'.
They deserve to be imprisoned.
They do not deserves sympathy.
He became a citizen of the United Kingdom via fraud and false documents. The most amazing thing about Somalians is that no matter what country they live in, they always proudly identify as Somalian.
But in this politically correct world we live, we are supposed to cry a river for him and blame the white man. Even thought it was white people who helped him every step of the way in his life.
SMH.
How ironic, given the way the British Empire (and Europe more broadly) appropriated and colonized, err, almost all of the planet !
He was orphaned at a very young age and raised by His aunties or/and uncles. His "brothers" are actually His real cousins, hence the different names n not so tight Bond. Anyone would have brought their closest family (Mom n siblings) to Europe to live with him. He is a millionaire.
He was sent to UK to live with relatives, maybe aunties/uncles or "cousin-cousins". THE White woman in the story helped him to get to UK. He was then made to work for a family. Many holes in His story indeed. What i found a bit strange is His school years. It does not add Up.
It happens a lot more than most realize. It is happening all the time in the US too.
One can find videos taken undercover of things like a woman bringing in baby after baby into the US. Each time she says the baby is hers and hand off the babies. This is why many of my friends in Central America are worried about their children being kidnapped by someone for human trafficking. There is so much rape, etc. Young girls arriving pregnant due to rape during human trafficking.
How ironic, given the way the British Empire (and Europe more broadly) appropriated and colonized, err, almost all of the planet !
We were just more successful than others. In fact, more successful than any other tribe in human history.
Every country we colonized was inhabited by blood thirsty savages. The Maoris, for example, had committed genocide against their peaceful polynesian predecessors in New Zealand, not long before we arrived. Just like the British were blood thirsty savages before the Romans came and colonized us.
We left every country better off. The people of Hong Kong wave Union Jacks and understand that being ruled by Britain was one of the best outcomes in history. The reason why Somalia and Ethiopia are perhaps the two most backward and chaotic nations in Africa is because they were the two least colonized.
Britain and other European countries will be brought back to the 7th century in 50 -100 years time when the new arrivals outnumber the natives.
Just before the British arrived, India was a quarter of the global economy. At the time of them leaving - 90% were in poverty. The population of Ireland in 1841 was HIGHER than today, because of the disasterous mismanagement by the British during the famine.
Sudan, Eritrea, Somalia, Uganda, Zimbabwe, Palestine, Iraq, Yemen, Bangladesh. These are not exactly sucesss stories that validate British rule.
We were just more successful than others. In fact, more successful than any other tribe in human history.
Every country we colonized was inhabited by blood thirsty savages. The Maoris, for example, had committed genocide against their peaceful polynesian predecessors in New Zealand, not long before we arrived. Just like the British were blood thirsty savages before the Romans came and colonized us.
We left every country better off. The people of Hong Kong wave Union Jacks and understand that being ruled by Britain was one of the best outcomes in history. The reason why Somalia and Ethiopia are perhaps the two most backward and chaotic nations in Africa is because they were the two least colonized.
Britain and other European countries will be brought back to the 7th century in 50 -100 years time when the new arrivals outnumber the natives.
Just before the British arrived, India was a quarter of the global economy. At the time of them leaving - 90% were in poverty. The population of Ireland in 1841 was HIGHER than today, because of the disasterous mismanagement by the British during the famine.
Sudan, Eritrea, Somalia, Uganda, Zimbabwe, Palestine, Iraq, Yemen, Bangladesh. These are not exactly sucesss stories that validate British rule.
You are talking to a white supremacist. Facts won’t shake his faith in his imagined narrative, one that views the world as a simple dichotomy: white people who created all modern civilization and the rest of the world that’s all uncivilized barbarians.
How ironic, given the way the British Empire (and Europe more broadly) appropriated and colonized, err, almost all of the planet !
We were just more successful than others. In fact, more successful than any other tribe in human history.
Every country we colonized was inhabited by blood thirsty savages. The Maoris, for example, had committed genocide against their peaceful polynesian predecessors in New Zealand, not long before we arrived. Just like the British were blood thirsty savages before the Romans came and colonized us.
We left every country better off. The people of Hong Kong wave Union Jacks and understand that being ruled by Britain was one of the best outcomes in history. The reason why Somalia and Ethiopia are perhaps the two most backward and chaotic nations in Africa is because they were the two least colonized.
Britain and other European countries will be brought back to the 7th century in 50 -100 years time when the new arrivals outnumber the natives.
How sad for you :) we're coming and there's nothing you can do about it :)
How ironic, given the way the British Empire (and Europe more broadly) appropriated and colonized, err, almost all of the planet !
We were just more successful than others. In fact, more successful than any other tribe in human history.
Every country we colonized was inhabited by blood thirsty savages. The Maoris, for example, had committed genocide against their peaceful polynesian predecessors in New Zealand, not long before we arrived. Just like the British were blood thirsty savages before the Romans came and colonized us.
We left every country better off. The people of Hong Kong wave Union Jacks and understand that being ruled by Britain was one of the best outcomes in history. The reason why Somalia and Ethiopia are perhaps the two most backward and chaotic nations in Africa is because they were the two least colonized.
Britain and other European countries will be brought back to the 7th century in 50 -100 years time when the new arrivals outnumber the natives.
Please, for the love of all that is decent, please let Coevett's detestable and blatantly racist posts on this thread be what gets his account permanently suspended (as it should have been long ago).
Just before the British arrived, India was a quarter of the global economy. At the time of them leaving - 90% were in poverty. The population of Ireland in 1841 was HIGHER than today, because of the disasterous mismanagement by the British during the famine.
Sudan, Eritrea, Somalia, Uganda, Zimbabwe, Palestine, Iraq, Yemen, Bangladesh. These are not exactly sucesss stories that validate British rule.
You are talking to a white supremacist. Facts won’t shake his faith in his imagined narrative, one that views the world as a simple dichotomy: white people who created all modern civilization and the rest of the world that’s all uncivilized barbarians.
Why are you being racist to the Barbarians?Why pick on them; what is your hidden narrative; are you aware of this?
How ironic, given the way the British Empire (and Europe more broadly) appropriated and colonized, err, almost all of the planet !
We were just more successful than others. In fact, more successful than any other tribe in human history.
Every country we colonized was inhabited by blood thirsty savages. The Maoris, for example, had committed genocide against their peaceful polynesian predecessors in New Zealand, not long before we arrived. Just like the British were blood thirsty savages before the Romans came and colonized us.
We left every country better off. The people of Hong Kong wave Union Jacks and understand that being ruled by Britain was one of the best outcomes in history. The reason why Somalia and Ethiopia are perhaps the two most backward and chaotic nations in Africa is because they were the two least colonized.
Britain and other European countries will be brought back to the 7th century in 50 -100 years time when the new arrivals outnumber the natives.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.