The burden you and he both have is that nothing you can say changes the decision. That's because the decision was based on the rules and the facts. Nothing you say is.
This not my burden, nor my goal. My goal is to evaluate the evidence.
It is your burden. While you were asleep more post were put on this thread , and you had to spend time reading them and replying to them. There will be many more Shelby posts and you will need to schedule and organize your days and weeks making sure every post is answered ..
"or it could've been someone around me. Like maybe I got drugged and didn't know about it "
Who drugged Shelbo , Karissa ? Ellise ? centro?
If people would stop interviewing Who?lihan, she might just fade away and have to work a job like your common person...or banned cheater.
She cheated. I personally don't care what happens to or with Shelby ever
Completely agree. I don't know if Houlihan's trying to ride some 15 minutes of fame, but it's pretty pathetic and her continuously denying she doped takes away all of her dignity. I don't have any respect for her. The best thing she could do now is to just fade away into obscurity and try and live an anonymous life.
You cheated and you got caught. Just accept it and move on.
If people would stop interviewing Who?lihan, she might just fade away and have to work a job like your common person...or banned cheater.
She cheated. I personally don't care what happens to or with Shelby ever
Completely agree. I don't know if Houlihan's trying to ride some 15 minutes of fame, but it's pretty pathetic and her continuously denying she doped takes away all of her dignity. I don't have any respect for her. The best thing she could do now is to just fade away into obscurity and try and live an anonymous life.
You cheated and you got caught. Just accept it and move on.
CAS never ruled on cheating when they found her guilty.
All the crazy spinning and verbal gymnastics are really just attempts to say Shelby could be a victim. It is all very exhausting and those on the inside who knew she was doping are applauding you who defend her and also secretly laughing at you.
All the crazy spinning and verbal gymnastics are really just attempts to say Shelby could be a victim. It is all very exhausting and those on the inside who knew she was doping are applauding you who defend her and also secretly laughing at you.
You have read the wada code then; such a crazy spin of flips and declared special meaning of words we used to think we understood.
Ordering a burrito isn't evidence. Same as a steak or a hamburger. It is simply a claim that it might have been something she ate. That isn't evidence.
The act of ordering a burrito is evidence. It may not be very probative evidence of the ultimate issues, but it is evidence.
It isn't evidence of what was claimed because the grounds for seeing it as a likely cause of nandrolone contamination were estimated to be "near zero".
The excuse is nothing more than an unsubstantiated claim that it could have been something she ate. Anything. A burrito doesn't of itself lead to an inference of likely accidental doping. CAS agreed.
"Because she doesn't know with 100% certainty, it could have been, and still can be, a burrito, or the vitamins, or sabotage, or any other possibility that still exists she hasn't thought of."(quote)
The possibility that hasn't occurred to either her or you is that she intentionally doped. It seems in all probability - not mere possibility - that's what she did, as CAS decided. But you are wedded to what is possible - not what is probably or most likely. What about the possibility (I would use a stronger term) that she is lying? Never occurred to you? I am 100% certain you will believe any argument except what has been shown to be most probable - that she doped.
I can't wait to hear the next "possibility" she hasn't yet thought of. She could say God/Trump/whoever told her to do it. You'll go with that - like all her other possibilities.
How did you so elegantly put it? "possibilities ... without evidence ... are pure fantasy."
You show you cannot tell the difference between what is merely possible and what is probable. Fortunately, CAS and just about everyone but you can.
The burden you and he both have is that nothing you can say changes the decision. That's because the decision was based on the rules and the facts. Nothing you say is.
This not my burden, nor my goal. My goal is to evaluate the evidence.
How did you so elegantly put it? "possibilities ... without evidence ... are pure fantasy."
You show you cannot tell the difference between what is merely possible and what is probable. Fortunately, CAS and just about everyone but you can.
Remind me again where CAS considered any "what is probable" alternative? Can you be specific, and point to all the evidence they considered? As you have so clearly established, without evidence, it is just pure fantasy.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.