SAFP compared to an European white sprinter:
SAFP compared to an European white sprinter:
Looks like the European sprinter has more developed musculature than SAFP and still ranked last in the race.
Armstrong, whatever his issues, is definitely not a racist. I've never seen him make an argument based along racist, anti-black lines. He just argues endlessly about doping, a crusade he cares enormously about. But he is not Coevett. Not close.
VroomVroom wrote:
I don’t care if it is or isn’t because of you look at Thompson and especially SAFP then you’d know they aren’t “legit”. Especially SAFP. She looks like a shorter version of jeter lol. She may of been clean at the start of her career, doubtful, but she dang sure hasn’t been the past eight.
The real question is how does SAFP keep getting the pass and not get busted?
I love performance enhancing drugs. Think they should all be legal. I just can’t stand SAFP holier than thought mommy rocket schtick lol.
Keep gassing it up girls. I’d like to see some Americans get to gassing and get up there.
Coleman should be pissed when he see’s safp running and he’s at the house for years lol.
SAFP. 10.60. Antidoping may as well give up - they have lost this race.
Doped to the gills in a time period full of drugs. And paid for it with failing health and death.
bloviating wrote:
Doped to the gills in a time period full of drugs. And paid for it with failing health and death.
That time period includes today. As we saw again in Lausanne.
Awesome pic. Just imagine Bolt in such a pic with all sub-9.8 sprinters:
9.58 Bolt (doped teammate)
9.69 Blake - doped
9.69 Gay - doped
9.72 Powell - doped
9.74 Gatlin - doped
9.76 Coleman (banned for 3 whereabout failures in 12 months)
9.77 Bromell (doped teammate)
9.78 Carter - doped
9.78 (DQ) Montgomery - doped
9.79 (DQ) Johnson - doped
9.79 Greene - doped
casual obsever wrote:
Awesome pic. Just imagine Bolt in such a pic with all sub-9.8 sprinters:
9.58 Bolt (doped teammate)
9.69 Blake - doped
9.69 Gay - doped
9.72 Powell - doped
9.74 Gatlin - doped
9.76 Coleman (banned for 3 whereabout failures in 12 months)
9.77 Bromell (doped teammate)
9.78 Carter - doped
9.78 (DQ) Montgomery - doped
9.79 (DQ) Johnson - doped
9.79 Greene - doped
Probably the best track and field stat of all-time.
Yep, the guy 0.11 seconds ahead in the shortest event on the track was absolutely the only one clean out of the 10 guys behind him (if we exclude Bromells seriously odd 9.77 and I would question his legitimacy too anyways). Sure he was clean, suuuuuuure.
420 Dogecoin wrote:
Elaine Thompson-Herah just ran 10.54 in the 100m with a legal wins of +0.9m/s
Flo Jo's WR is widely dismissed as wind aided. Many do not believe the wind reading of 0.0. The main arguments are that it was windy that day and other heats run on the same day had high wind readings, so a time that fast from Flo Jo most have been wind aided. Thus theory has also been perpetuated by disbelief that such a time is even possible from a women.
33 years later and a women has now run within .10 of Flo Jo's WR, proving that such speed is possible from a women.
The evidence against Flo Jo's time is entirely anecdotal. She later ran 21.34 in the 200m which is a fair bit faster than Thompson-Herah's 21.53 PB. Is it that hard to believe that Flo Jo could also muster up a faster 100m than Elaine can?
Who cares? I just ran 3.65 in the 35 yard dash at 6'0 and 220.
What's Elaine? Like 145 pounds? That's so weak.
Elaines nowhere near my current level of fitness.
420 Dogecoin wrote:
Elaine Thompson-Herah just ran 10.54 in the 100m with a legal wins of +0.9m/s
Flo Jo's WR is widely dismissed as wind aided. Many do not believe the wind reading of 0.0. The main arguments are that it was windy that day and other heats run on the same day had high wind readings, so a time that fast from Flo Jo most have been wind aided. Thus theory has also been perpetuated by disbelief that such a time is even possible from a women.
33 years later and a women has now run within .10 of Flo Jo's WR, proving that such speed is possible from a women.
The evidence against Flo Jo's time is entirely anecdotal. She later ran 21.34 in the 200m which is a fair bit faster than Thompson-Herah's 21.53 PB. Is it that hard to believe that Flo Jo could also muster up a faster 100m than Elaine can?
[img]
https://i.imgur.com/tC1gdoQ.jpg[/img]
Who's hotter? Me or Elaine? Just took this pic this past week at 6'0 and 220. Natural muscle.
Exactly.
Plus why does she look so dumb when she celebrates? I'm sitting there thinking like WTH with her 100 olympic win.
John_James_413 wrote:
420 Dogecoin wrote:
Elaine Thompson-Herah just ran 10.54 in the 100m with a legal wins of +0.9m/s
Flo Jo's WR is widely dismissed as wind aided. Many do not believe the wind reading of 0.0. The main arguments are that it was windy that day and other heats run on the same day had high wind readings, so a time that fast from Flo Jo most have been wind aided. Thus theory has also been perpetuated by disbelief that such a time is even possible from a women.
33 years later and a women has now run within .10 of Flo Jo's WR, proving that such speed is possible from a women.
The evidence against Flo Jo's time is entirely anecdotal. She later ran 21.34 in the 200m which is a fair bit faster than Thompson-Herah's 21.53 PB. Is it that hard to believe that Flo Jo could also muster up a faster 100m than Elaine can?
[img]
https://i.imgur.com/tC1gdoQ.jpg[/img]
Who's hotter? Me or Elaine? Just took this pic this past week at 6'0 and 220. Natural muscle.
Exactly.
Plus why does she look so dumb when she celebrates? I'm sitting there thinking like WTH with her 100 olympic win.
Good thing you left the head-shot out. Would have ruined the effect entirely.
I was also reminded of pics of a hairless chimp.
John_James_413 wrote:
420 Dogecoin wrote:
Elaine Thompson-Herah just ran 10.54 in the 100m with a legal wins of +0.9m/s
Flo Jo's WR is widely dismissed as wind aided. Many do not believe the wind reading of 0.0. The main arguments are that it was windy that day and other heats run on the same day had high wind readings, so a time that fast from Flo Jo most have been wind aided. Thus theory has also been perpetuated by disbelief that such a time is even possible from a women.
33 years later and a women has now run within .10 of Flo Jo's WR, proving that such speed is possible from a women.
The evidence against Flo Jo's time is entirely anecdotal. She later ran 21.34 in the 200m which is a fair bit faster than Thompson-Herah's 21.53 PB. Is it that hard to believe that Flo Jo could also muster up a faster 100m than Elaine can?
Who cares? I just ran 3.65 in the 35 yard dash at 6'0 and 220.
What's Elaine? Like 145 pounds? That's so weak.
Elaines nowhere near my current level of fitness.
Obviously a watch malfunction.
casual obsever wrote:
Awesome pic. Just imagine Bolt in such a pic with all sub-9.8 sprinters:
9.58 Bolt (doped teammate)
9.69 Blake - doped
9.69 Gay - doped
9.72 Powell - doped
9.74 Gatlin - doped
9.76 Coleman (banned for 3 whereabout failures in 12 months)
9.77 Bromell (doped teammate)
9.78 Carter - doped
9.78 (DQ) Montgomery - doped
9.79 (DQ) Johnson - doped
9.79 Greene - doped
If testing was more effective you could probably compile the same sort of stats for every event.
I think so too. KInd of weird that the 100m women formally look less dirty than the men.
That was 11 up there. For comparison, here the top-11 women over 1500:
1) G. Dibaba 2015 – Drug Cheat Coach Aden
2) Y. Qu 1993 – Drug Cheat Coach Ma
3) J. Bo 1997 – Drug Cheat Coach Ma
4) F. Kipyegon 2021
5) Y. Lang 1997 – Drug Cheat Coach Ma
6) J. Wang 1993 – Drug Cheat Coach Ma
7) S. Hassan 2019 – Drug Cheat Coach Salazar, passport suspicious 2016
8) T. Kazankina 1980 – Cold War State-Sponsored doping
9) L. Yin 1997 – Drug Cheat Coach Ma
10) P. Ivan 1988 – Cold War State-Sponsored doping
11) L. Lan 1997 – Drug Cheat Coach Ma
1500 m top Caucasians
1) T. Kazankina 1980 – Cold War State-Sponsored doping
2) P. Ivan 1988 – Cold War State-Sponsored doping
3) O. Dvirna 1982 – Cold War State-Sponsored doping
4) S. Houlihan 2019 – Banned Drug Cheat
5) L. Muir 2021
Here is a video about Flo-Jo I just found.
Hear her voice at 6:25.
Contrary to all others black girls in the movie, her voice is deep and masculine.
I dont know if she was like that before.
Passant wrote:
https://i.ibb.co/z75zmBN/01.jpg
That’s a silly picture because Flo Jo likely ran a 10.68 basic in that race so she would be behind. Had Elaine ran in the same conditions that Flo Jo did she would have gone 10.39.
in the last 20 plus years of sprinting debates this is the first I hear of this.
This looks as legit as Ben Johnson.
Put ET on the same juice as Flojo and she would easily beat Flojo's time.
Not sure why previous photo didn't show up.
