I think your hang-up has nothing to do with the statistical facts regarding tennis because you consistently make arguments in denial of them. Partial proof of this is demonstrated by your failure to name who is the GOAT. You know that no other player has the statistical (factual) strength of Djokovic so you simply fail to name this non-existent person. "Not Djokovic" is not a valid answer and we all know it, including you.
Incidentally, I provided several statistical proofs that the era(s) where Djokovic was dominant were the strongest. "Dudes like Kyrgios" is pathetic and lame as an argument. He played him 3 times. Yawn. The people Djokovic played the most were the other contenders for GOAT status and he's got the edge on all off them.
Djokovic Head-to-head vs Every Slam Winner since 2005
Rafael Nadal 31–29 (the most prolific head-to-head in tennis history) Roger Federer 27–23 Andy Murray 25–11 Stan Wawrinka 21–6 Juan Martin del Potro 16–4 Marin Čilić 19-2 Daniil Medvedev 9–5 Dominic Thiem 7–5 Carlos Alcaraz 5–3 Jannik Sinner 4–5 Safin 0-2
Incidentally, nearly all the above players and virtually all the former GOATs as well as the best experts believe Nole is the GOAT.
Djokovic is the GOAT of tennis.
Your reasons for being in denial are unrelated to tennis.
Bingo. Especially your last sentence.
This is the same argument others have made. I gave a logical explanation for why it’s not good enough to earn him GOAT status.
I’ve defended my opinion clearly. You guys need to learn to move on. I guess you still haven’t from covid either
Of course, all evidence must be considered. I am not a slave to dogma like some. Unfortunately for your boys they are still glowing.
Hey, I give you credit for at least stating an opinion on Federer as goat. That it’s based on nothing more than he had a beautiful game, a beautiful Rolex, and you don’t *think* he doped to the level of the other guys is at least something
Correct, however my thinking means a lot, especially to me.
You’ve missed the point. Anyone is absolutely free to voice their opinion. What part of me asking someone to state their opinion and stand behind it are you perturbed by?
Just the repetition and rudeness. Someone doesn’t want to answer your question. So be it. No need to spam.
Don’t spam. Harambe. You’re a joke. Get out of here.
2600 bro and I ensnared bystander already. You can drop it. He wouldn’t even answer a basic question when he said he wouldn’t
“Don’t know, don’t care” will go down in history. Perhaps the greatest flustered seething and petulant departure from a COVID thread since Facts Matter.
I’ve never seen someone so quickly and thoroughly obliterate their rhetorical credibility. 50+ posts all to waste.
What a night. lol It was like a prison riot. A valiant, but failed effort by Harambe and 2600 bro to topple the GOAT.
Our primate friends attempted to overwhelm the thread with unsupported opinions, suppositions and innuendo. No logic. No reasoning. No facts. Just faith-based rhetoric and banana-fueled optimism. “Trust me, bro” rang out mightily from their hairy fingers as they threw every logical fallacy at Djokovic.
In the end logic, reasoning and facts prevailed. The gorilla uprising was a rhetorical failure. Djoker remains the GOAT and our rioters are left to cope and seethe for another day.
Chokervic was late to the “big three” so he farmed a lot of wins as Federer and Nadal declined.
I think your hang-up has nothing to do with the statistical facts regarding tennis because you consistently make arguments in denial of them. Partial proof of this is demonstrated by your failure to name who is the GOAT. You know that no other player has the statistical (factual) strength of Djokovic so you simply fail to name this non-existent person. "Not Djokovic" is not a valid answer and we all know it, including you.
Incidentally, I provided several statistical proofs that the era(s) where Djokovic was dominant were the strongest. "Dudes like Kyrgios" is pathetic and lame as an argument. He played him 3 times. Yawn. The people Djokovic played the most were the other contenders for GOAT status and he's got the edge on all off them.
Djokovic Head-to-head vs Every Slam Winner since 2005
Rafael Nadal 31–29 (the most prolific head-to-head in tennis history) Roger Federer 27–23 Andy Murray 25–11 Stan Wawrinka 21–6 Juan Martin del Potro 16–4 Marin Čilić 19-2 Daniil Medvedev 9–5 Dominic Thiem 7–5 Carlos Alcaraz 5–3 Jannik Sinner 4–5 Safin 0-2
Incidentally, nearly all the above players and virtually all the former GOATs as well as the best experts believe Nole is the GOAT.
Djokovic is the GOAT of tennis.
Your reasons for being in denial are unrelated to tennis.
I appreciate you putting the time into these informative posts. One Mats Wilander, who I doubt these guys remember, prefers to call Djokovic the BOAT (best of all time).
I think your hang-up has nothing to do with the statistical facts regarding tennis because you consistently make arguments in denial of them. Partial proof of this is demonstrated by your failure to name who is the GOAT. You know that no other player has the statistical (factual) strength of Djokovic so you simply fail to name this non-existent person. "Not Djokovic" is not a valid answer and we all know it, including you.
Incidentally, I provided several statistical proofs that the era(s) where Djokovic was dominant were the strongest. "Dudes like Kyrgios" is pathetic and lame as an argument. He played him 3 times. Yawn. The people Djokovic played the most were the other contenders for GOAT status and he's got the edge on all off them.
Djokovic Head-to-head vs Every Slam Winner since 2005
Rafael Nadal 31–29 (the most prolific head-to-head in tennis history) Roger Federer 27–23 Andy Murray 25–11 Stan Wawrinka 21–6 Juan Martin del Potro 16–4 Marin Čilić 19-2 Daniil Medvedev 9–5 Dominic Thiem 7–5 Carlos Alcaraz 5–3 Jannik Sinner 4–5 Safin 0-2
Incidentally, nearly all the above players and virtually all the former GOATs as well as the best experts believe Nole is the GOAT.
Djokovic is the GOAT of tennis.
Your reasons for being in denial are unrelated to tennis.
I appreciate you putting the time into these informative posts. One Mats Wilander, who I doubt these guys remember, prefers to call Djokovic the BOAT (best of all time).
A subjective opinion.
one wonders why you three or four are so upset my subjective opinion is different
Your daily dose of Djoker GOATness. Today’s dose is brought to because Harambe keeps begging posters to stop proving how GOAT Djokovic is.
Only one man in history has had the versatility and GOATness to win more than 75 matches at each Grand Slam. Djokovic, of course. He has won at least 90 matches at each Grand Slam? 2nd best? Only 73. He has put the GOAT debate so far out of reach that only a fool would even mention any one else.
I think your hang-up has nothing to do with the statistical facts regarding tennis because you consistently make arguments in denial of them. Partial proof of this is demonstrated by your failure to name who is the GOAT. You know that no other player has the statistical (factual) strength of Djokovic so you simply fail to name this non-existent person. "Not Djokovic" is not a valid answer and we all know it, including you.
Incidentally, I provided several statistical proofs that the era(s) where Djokovic was dominant were the strongest. "Dudes like Kyrgios" is pathetic and lame as an argument. He played him 3 times. Yawn. The people Djokovic played the most were the other contenders for GOAT status and he's got the edge on all off them.
Djokovic Head-to-head vs Every Slam Winner since 2005
Rafael Nadal 31–29 (the most prolific head-to-head in tennis history) Roger Federer 27–23 Andy Murray 25–11 Stan Wawrinka 21–6 Juan Martin del Potro 16–4 Marin Čilić 19-2 Daniil Medvedev 9–5 Dominic Thiem 7–5 Carlos Alcaraz 5–3 Jannik Sinner 4–5 Safin 0-2
Incidentally, nearly all the above players and virtually all the former GOATs as well as the best experts believe Nole is the GOAT.
Djokovic is the GOAT of tennis.
Your reasons for being in denial are unrelated to tennis.
I appreciate you putting the time into these informative posts. One Mats Wilander, who I doubt these guys remember, prefers to call Djokovic the BOAT (best of all time).
I appreciate you putting the time into these informative posts. One Mats Wilander, who I doubt these guys remember, prefers to call Djokovic the BOAT (best of all time).
I appreciate you putting the time into these informative posts. One Mats Wilander, who I doubt these guys remember, prefers to call Djokovic the BOAT (best of all time).
A subjective opinion.
one wonders why you three or four are so upset my subjective opinion is different
Lebron is the goat too if we go by era and stats.
Nobody’s upset that your subjective opinion is different. What they are upset about is you don’t actually have a subjective opinion; you are not willing to commit to a position of who you think the GOAT really is and why, only who it isn’t based on irrational hatred. Because you know you would be torn asunder.
It’s your lack of courage followed by overconfident, arrogant posting that riles people up. But, then again, that’s your entire goal. Our goal is to keep you slaving away at your keyboard on a daily basis, and it’s working beautifully. We all know that you don’t have it in you to call it good and leave a thread if you don’t get the last word. Prove me wrong. You can’t.
one wonders why you three or four are so upset my subjective opinion is different
Lebron is the goat too if we go by era and stats.
Nobody’s upset that your subjective opinion is different. What they are upset about is you don’t actually have a subjective opinion; you are not willing to commit to a position of who you think the GOAT really is and why, only who it isn’t based on irrational hatred. Because you know you would be torn asunder.
It’s your lack of courage followed by overconfident, arrogant posting that riles people up. But, then again, that’s your entire goal. Our goal is to keep you slaving away at your keyboard on a daily basis, and it’s working beautifully. We all know that you don’t have it in you to call it good and leave a thread if you don’t get the last word. Prove me wrong. You can’t.
Well even when I explained my thoroughly qualitative analysis you still didn’t accept it, so perhaps you need to be better at convincing Harambe you accept his different beliefs!
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.