Nancy Pelosi's husband "violently assaulted" in their San Francisco home

No way the guy works a real job with this fervent posting rate. He's living off someone else's hard work, clearly. Disappointing!

I have taken an interest in this thread, on a subject I usually don't care about. For that, I thank you and your aliases and troll friends.

But it has all been under one name - except some under Pol Quam, which one of you creepy types registered, and THEN in the last 5 minutes or so, you registered Pol Quamy, and Pol Quami, so now its Pol Quams.

Registering a name because you disagree with the poster is really creepy behavior. Like DePape-type behavior. Creepy. Max creep.

Says the guy that posts more than either of them...

Well it looks like two more people are in on the big staged event and false flag! the neighbor and the guys boss both confirmed he became a full blown M.aga over the last few years and you could not shut him up with his right wing nuttery. he believed all of the crazy. pizzagate, virus hoax, big lie

What is dishonest? 195 republicans and only 10 did not vote against codifying the right to contraceptives. That sounds pretty extreme to me. But I'm not so misguided I think that means the majority of republican citizens believe the same.

Yes, there is liberal extremism. But you better recognize it in the party you support as well. And where is your evidence that any of the above politicians you listed support late term abortion? There is none because they do not. They are against banning abortion and giving women the right to choose. Fetterman said the woman, her doctor, and the state should choose. That's not unrestricted abortion. Again all or nothing black and white thinking.

I do agree that someone with a stroke is not right for politics though. Your problem is you can call out the opposition, but you can't see that your own party has plenty of it's own flaws.

Everyone's poop stinks. Even yours.

Of course they won't be released. Neither will security cam footage from the Pelosi home. Why? Because it would blow up the Pelosi lie

Sure, I am a basement dwelling troglodyte. I admit as much.

Do you?

Hey guys, let this sink in. I needed a laugh from the adult in the room. I must be a child. Laughing like a little kid right now.

Clearly a cover up

Adult in the room is almost in his final form. He will become..carmine09.

Simple minded people are always giggling..

Trump is the most investigated president in history and has never been convicted of a crime...fact...

Amazing, isn’t it?

zerohedge.com

'Democracy Dies In Darkness' - Unless You Want Pelosi Video Released

WaPo claims "‘Release the video’ is mostly a way to extend the conspiracy theory..."

Open link

Open image

Of course. Sh-tbag corrupt liberals are going to do what sh-tbag corrupt liberals do… hide the truth.

When it comes to releasing security video, I think it would be stupid, for security reasons to release video that shows anything about the Pelosi residence that can't be seen from google maps. For example, I see no reason to release, outside the context of the actual trial, video from inside the Pelosi house. And were that video to be shown to a jury, I would show it in private and block the public view. Since there are too many people who want to hunt Nancy. Why show them the inside of her house. But likely nothing would be hurt by dropping the tabloids a short clip of the back door being smashed in. Since the picture of the back yard is already well circulated. But it wouldn't be real odd if the face of the smasher was a bit obscured on the security video. The story will come out in time. Obviously near everything can be faked and spun. But what would be the advantage to the Pelosi's to have video footage from inside their house all over the internet?

It's like a life lesson for younger posters. "See? Look at these clowns. See what happens when you dabble in hysteria and dark fruitcake conspiracy theory? Now put that DiPape manifesto down before your hurt somebody."

Magoo, sh!tbag liberals are NOT the issue. What YOU (AdultintheRoom) need to do is provide a summary of your emotional state when you were lying in this thread as if you were a sh!tbag liberal.

These three statements by you are all easily demonstrable lies. We are all just interested in why you would type them.

1. "No statements from DePape lawyers"

2. "No residence search at DePape’s"

3. "Google street view only comes every 5-10 years"

There's many more, but maybe just comment a little on why you felt compelled to type those lies. Just like 2-3 sentences explaining how you felt and what you were thinking you would get from the lying experience.

Classic Adult response.

Hysterical us LR geniuses are out here investigating whether or not this guy actually got bludgeoned with a hammer.