how does that work? wrote:
There you go again. Long winded explanations of how you don't get it.
What doesn't rekrunner get?[/quote]
I don't ever get responses with specificity.
how does that work? wrote:
There you go again. Long winded explanations of how you don't get it.
What doesn't rekrunner get?[/quote]
I don't ever get responses with specificity.
rekrunner wrote:
how does that work? wrote:
There you go again. Long winded explanations of how you don't get it.
What doesn't rekrunner get?
I don't ever get responses with specificity.[/quote]
Sure you do. You just re-word specificity.
Now engage Jon in a discussion on caffeine. Go on.
rekrunner wrote:
how does that work? wrote:
There you go again. Long winded explanations of how you don't get it.
What doesn't rekrunner get?
I don't ever get responses with specificity.[/quote]
Nice quote mangling btw.
Tom Cochrane wrote:
how does that work? wrote:
He was my senior lecturer. He knows a lot of stuff about oxygen kinetics. You would probably fall asleep after 5 minutes, but I find it fascinating.
You should have asked him what ergogenic means and how caffeine works. You're saying you know more than your senior lecturer?
What does it mean to you? What does it mean to him?
Does caffeine improve oxygen kinetics?
rekrunner wrote:
Tom Cochrane wrote:
There you go again. Long winded explanations of how you don't get it.
There you go again with the indefinite pronoun "it". Of course I get "it".
What is "it"?
rekrunner wrote:
how does that work? wrote:
Why aren't they banned too?
What gets banned is a committee decision, guided by meeting 2 out of 3 criteria.
If it was considered, and not banned, it was determined by committee to meet none, or only one of 1) potential performance enhancement; 2) potential harm; 3) bad spirit
WADA loada responsibility that must be. Thousands of chemicals to consider. Do they go to the pub afterwards?
Tom Cochrane wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
What doesn't rekrunner get?
I don't ever get responses with specificity.
Sure you do. You just re-word specificity.
Now engage Jon in a discussion on caffeine. Go on.[/quote]
That would be interesting. Would I go faster with or withuot caffeine? Who is going to be my senior lecturer on caffeine doping and proposed mechanisms of efficacy?
Tom Cochrane wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
What doesn't rekrunner get?
I don't ever get responses with specificity.
Nice quote mangling btw.[/quote]
Yes that one got mangled. I never said that. How does that work?
how does that work? wrote:
Tom Cochrane wrote:
You should have asked him what ergogenic means and how caffeine works. You're saying you know more than your senior lecturer?
What does it mean to you? What does it mean to him?
Does caffeine improve oxygen kinetics?
You're saying you know more than Jack Daniels? Do you even understand the question?
how does that work? wrote:
Tom Cochrane wrote:
I don't ever get responses with specificity.
Sure you do. You just re-word specificity.
Now engage Jon in a discussion on caffeine. Go on.
That would be interesting. Would I go faster with or withuot caffeine? Who is going to be my senior lecturer on caffeine doping and proposed mechanisms of efficacy?[/quote]
Depends which imaginary school you attend.
Tom Cochrane wrote:
how does that work? wrote:
Sure you do. You just re-word specificity.
Now engage Jon in a discussion on caffeine. Go on.
That would be interesting. Would I go faster with or withuot caffeine? Who is going to be my senior lecturer on caffeine doping and proposed mechanisms of efficacy?
Depends which imaginary school you attend.[/quote]
School of Osriris?
Tom Cochrane wrote:
how does that work? wrote:
What does it mean to you? What does it mean to him?
Does caffeine improve oxygen kinetics?
You're saying you know more than Jack Daniels? Do you even understand the question?
You explain it, you are an expert on oxygen kinetics.
how does that work? wrote:
Tom Cochrane wrote:
You're saying you know more than Jack Daniels? Do you even understand the question?
You explain it, you are an expert on oxygen kinetics.
So you're saying Jack couldn't explain it to you? Did you ever have coffee with him?
Estimate El Gerrouj's VO2max when he was winning all those races?
how does that work? wrote:
Estimate El Gerrouj's VO2max when he was winning all those races?
Jack can tell you that. He wrote charts for you.
He might even know how to spell the dudes name.
Talk about it over coffee.
Tom Cochrane wrote:
how does that work? wrote:
Estimate El Gerrouj's VO2max when he was winning all those races?
Jack can tell you that. He wrote charts for you.
He might even know how to spell the dudes name.
Talk about it over coffee.
Do you understand vdot is not VO2 max?
how does that work? wrote:
Tom Cochrane wrote:
Jack can tell you that. He wrote charts for you.
He might even know how to spell the dudes name.
Talk about it over coffee.
Do you understand vdot is not VO2 max?
Do you understand guesstimating is not science?
Tom Cochrane wrote:
how does that work? wrote:
Do you understand vdot is not VO2 max?
Do you understand guesstimating is not science?
Yes. Let's ask a real actual scientist type person shall we?
Who shall we ask? JD or JK?
how does that work? wrote:
Tom Cochrane wrote:
Do you understand guesstimating is not science?
Yes. Let's ask a real actual scientist type person shall we?
Who shall we ask? JD or JK?
You haven't asked yet? Wow.
rekrunner wrote:
Tom Cochrane wrote:
Citations?
Everything.
I realise you're not too bright but I said above that for a ban there had to be an objection that the substance in question was performance enhancing, not merely the fact that it may be so - which is why coffee and sleeping pills to get a good night's rest aren't banned.