Is this the first time in history that the president and vice president are plagiarists?
Is this the first time in history that the president and vice president are plagiarists?
Politico: The Biden team is not optimistic.
"Privately, Biden’s team does not expect to win the races, according to Democratic officials, but they are more optimistic about their chances than they were weeks ago. Though the president-elect narrowly won the state in November, they attribute that to a powerful anti-Trump sentiment that did not translate down the ballot. Perdue received about 88,000 more votes than Ossoff, and the top two Republicans combined got more than 636,000 votes than Warnock in the special election."
betting odds just swung sharply toward the Rs - not sure why but probably something to do with turnout.
Poor Donald, nobody likes him.
Not in Mar de Lago or in Scotland.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/05/europe/trump-unwelcome-scotland-coronavirus-gbr-intl/index.html
Santa Klauz wrote:
I thought Mondale was from SD?
That was George McGovern.
Calamity Joe wrote:
Is this the first time in history that the president and vice president are plagiarists?
Well, the outgoing guy paid someone to take his SAT for him, and his wife stole Michelle Obama's speech. So that's pretty much the same.
For all we know Trump has tried to plagiarize many people, many times but his Swiss cheese brain turns everything he says into word salad so it impossible to tell.
johnny99 wrote:
Calamity Joe wrote:
Is this the first time in history that the president and vice president are plagiarists?
Well, the outgoing guy paid someone to take his SAT for him, and his wife stole Michelle Obama's speech. So that's pretty much the same.
An extremely hostile niece alleges that A 1/3 OF A CENTURY AFTER THE FACT just to sell her book.
I allege, you allege, all the same.
Calamity Joe wrote:
johnny99 wrote:
Well, the outgoing guy paid someone to take his SAT for him, and his wife stole Michelle Obama's speech. So that's pretty much the same.
An extremely hostile niece alleges that A 1/3 OF A CENTURY AFTER THE FACT just to sell her book.
Calamity Joe wrote:
An extremely hostile niece alleges that A 1/3 OF A CENTURY AFTER THE FACT just to sell her book.
Trump is 74. Minus one-third [sic] of a century means that Trump was 41 years-old when he faked the SAT. ... #Sallymathfail.
PS. "Alleges that A 1/3 OF A CENTURY AFTER", is this supposed to be English? #epicenglishfail
I am Sam wrote:
Not sure if you watched "Death to 2020" on Netflix.
There is this lady in UK, Gemma Nerrick (played by Dianne Morgan ) who is the "Average Citizen", and after binging on all the shows, she comes across this 'show' called 'America', which is just watching the news about America, and it rings so true to us outside of USA...everyday one checks to see what ridiculous thing has come out , it has captivated us.
It will sure be different without Trump.
...and today, I tune in to Channel America, and the news of Scotland telling him that travel to play golf, the day before inauguration, will not be allowed as essential.
You do not need Netflix
Ossoff and Warnock are "leading" at the moment.
Any come from behind win by Republicans would have to be suspicious.
the needles are blue, by a hair, but they've been blue since they turned on. that means the results are bluer than it would take for blues to win.
predictit now has both dems winning.
an hour ago it had both Rs winning.
predictit:
2:1 odds that the Dems will win the Senate
L L wrote:
Ossoff and Warnock are "leading" at the moment.
Any come from behind win by Republicans would have to be suspicious.
STOP THE COUNT!
It's sounding like election day turnout in rural red counties is down 15-20%, which is the R's biggest problem.
Without Trump on the ballot, they don't give a carp.
de-reagan wrote:
Calamity Joe wrote:
An extremely hostile niece alleges that A 1/3 OF A CENTURY AFTER THE FACT just to sell her book.
Trump is 74. Minus one-third [sic] of a century means that Trump was 41 years-old when he faked the SAT. ... #Sallymathfail.
PS. "Alleges that A 1/3 OF A CENTURY AFTER", is this supposed to be English? #epicenglishfail
This from someone who claims to be a mathematician and regularly calls people out for misspellings or poor grammar here.
I’m liking the Ds chances. My buddy who is pretty tied into the GA political scene, likes to gamble on politics and who is inherently pessimistic about the D sweep is now feeling optimistic. That means more to me than the effing needle or the 16 years olds pumping and dumping on predictit
You have it backwards. Normally bad weather hurts Dems (have a less dedicated voter base than the Repubs, at least historically). Good weather is good for Republican turnout...but is great for Democratic turnout.
Fat hurts wrote:
It has been a beautiful day here in Georgia. I was hoping for a blizzard.
Good weather is good for Republican turnout.